The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effective Molecular Dynamics from Neural-Network Based Structure Prediction Models
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01027 · Paper page
Abstract
Recent breakthroughs in neural-network based structure prediction methods, such as AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold, have dramatically improved the quality of computational protein structure prediction. These models also provide statistical confidence scores that can estimate uncertainties in the predicted structures, but it remains unclear to what extent these scores are related to the intrinsic conformational dynamics of proteins. Here we compare AlphaFold2 prediction scores with >60 μs of explicit molecular dynamics simulations of 28 one- and two-domain proteins with varying degree of flexibility. We demonstrate a strong correlation between the statistical prediction scores and the explicit motion derived from extensive atomistic molecular dynamics simulations, and further derive an elastic network model based on the statistical scores of AlphFold2 (AF-ENM), which we benchmark in combination with coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations. We show that our AF-ENM method reproduces the global protein dynamics with improved accuracy, providing a powerful way to derive effective molecular dynamics using neural-network based structure prediction models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
AlphaFold and Implications for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Ruff, K. M., & Pappu, R. V. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167208 · Cited by 635
Sampling alternative conformational states of transporters and receptors with AlphaFold2
del Alamo, D., Sala, D., Mchaourab, H. S., & Meiler, J. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.75751 · Cited by 511
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 60
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/d41586-022-02083-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-022-33729-4 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2021.09.26.461876 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102372 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2022.02.18.481080 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.03.03.482768 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkg571 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2021.10.11.463937 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.str.2022.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155255 · DOI
- 10.1080/23746149.2018.1477531 · DOI
- 10.1021/ct9002114 · DOI
- 10.1021/ct700324x · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1905 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00163 · DOI
- 10.1021/jp071097f · DOI
- 10.1021/ct300646g · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-021-01098-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1039/c3cs60093a · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00286 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.043 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ct900313w · DOI
- 10.1002/adts.202100391 · DOI
- 10.1021/ct400008p · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0187936 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007870 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.abc3786 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01042 · DOI
- 10.1529/biophysj.107.127233 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00986 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102101 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1800690115 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb.1682 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1114414109 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-020-15050-0 · DOI
- 10.1002/cbic.202000699 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01074 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.22855 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.22841 · DOI
- 10.1107/S2059798316001510 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444911051195 · DOI
- 10.1038/embor.2009.55 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-62703-658-0_11 · DOI
- 10.1080/14786440109462720 · DOI
- 10.1214/aoms/1177729694 · DOI · Paper page
- Perez-Cruz, F. Kullback-Leibler Divergence Estimation of Continuous Distributions. Ieee Int Symp Info 2008, 1666–1670. DOI: Doi 10.1109/Isit.2008.4595271. · DOI
- 10.1016/S1359-0278(97)00024-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.2408420 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.328693 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-0716-0270-6_15 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Jussupow, A., & Kaila, V. R. I.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Kaila, Ville R. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-10-18
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1965-1975
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11181330
- OpenAlex
- W4360829321
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancerfonden (pj200968)
- Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (2019.0043, 2019.0251)
- Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- protein conformational dynamics, AlphaFold2, elastic network model, coarse-grained molecular dynamics, protein flexibility
- MeSH terms
- Molecular Conformation, Motion, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review