PreprintCited by 10Enzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fitting high-resolution electron density maps from atomic models to solution scattering data

Open access
Chamberlain, Sarah R., Moore, Stephen, Grant, Thomas D.·2023·Biophysical Journal

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.10.034 · Paper page

Abstract

Solution scattering techniques, such as small and wide-angle X-ray scattering (SWAXS), provide valuable insights into the structure and dynamics of biological macromolecules in solution. In this study, we present an approach to accurately predict solution X-ray scattering profiles at wide angles from atomic models by generating high-resolution electron density maps. Our method accounts for the excluded volume of bulk solvent by calculating unique adjusted atomic volumes directly from the atomic coordinates. This approach eliminates the need for a free fitting parameter commonly used in existing algorithms, resulting in improved accuracy of the calculated SWAXS profile. An implicit model of the hydration shell is generated which uses the form factor of water. Two parameters, namely the bulk solvent density and the mean hydration shell contrast, are adjusted to best fit the data. Results using eight publicly available SWAXS profiles show high quality fits to the data. In each case, the optimized parameter values show small adjustments demonstrating that the default values are close to the true solution. Disabling parameter optimization results in a significant improvement of the calculated scattering profiles compared to the leading software. The algorithm is computationally efficient, showing more than tenfold reduction in execution time compared to the leading software. The algorithm is encoded in a command line script called denss.pdb2mrc.py and is available open source as part of the DENSS v1.7.0 software package ( https://github.com/tdgrant1/denss ). In addition to improving the ability to compare atomic models to experimental SWAXS data, these developments pave the way for increasing the accuracy of modeling algorithms utilizing SWAXS data while decreasing the risk of overfitting. Statement of Significance: Accurate calculation of small and wide-angle scattering (SWAXS) profiles from atomic models is useful for studying the solution state and conformational dynamics of biological macromolecules in solution. Here we present a new approach to calculating SWAXS profiles from atomic models using high resolution real space density maps. This approach includes novel calculations of solvent contributions that remove a significant fitting parameter. The algorithm is tested on multiple high quality experimental SWAXS datasets, showing improved accuracy compared to leading software. The algorithm is computationally efficient and robust to overfitting, paving the way for increasing the accuracy and resolution of modeling algorithms utilizing experimental SWAXS data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.06.02.543451

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.1002/bip.21630 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.abb.2017.05.005 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.11.022 · DOI
  4. 10.1089/cmb.2016.0139 · DOI
  5. Lattman, E. E. , T. D. Grant , and E. H. Snell . 2018. Biological Small Angle Scattering: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press. · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77984-6 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77443-6 · DOI
  8. 10.1107/S0021889809000338 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/nmeth.4581 · DOI
  10. 10.1090/S0025-5718-1965-0178586-1 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1007/s10969-009-9075-x · DOI
  12. 10.1529/biophysj.105.064154 · DOI
  13. 10.1186/1472-6807-12-17 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.03.062 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/ja069124n · DOI
  16. 10.1107/S0021889895007047 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/nar/gkq461 · DOI
  18. 10.1107/S0021889809032919 · DOI
  19. 10.1107/S2059798317005745 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/nar/gkr430 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/nar/gkv309 · DOI
  22. 10.1063/1.4896220 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.021 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/andp.19153510606 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.036 · DOI
  26. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-429 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.003 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/bip.360220607 · DOI
  29. 10.1107/S0567739468000550 · DOI
  30. Brown, P. , A. Fox , E. Maslen , M. O’keefe , and B. Willis . 2006. 6.1. Intensity of diffracted intensities. International Tables for Crystallography C. 554. · DOI
  31. 10.1063/1.3099611 · DOI
  32. 10.1107/S0021889878014296 · DOI
  33. 10.1021/j100785a001 · DOI
  34. 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2267 · DOI
  35. 10.1063/5.0007158 · DOI
  36. 10.1107/S1600576722006598 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1107/S002188988001179X · DOI
  39. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2401 · DOI
  40. 10.1107/S2059798319011471 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1002/pro.3731 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90598-1 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.06.027 · DOI
  45. 10.1063/1.3298862 · DOI
  46. 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 2012, Implementing the Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm with adaptive parameters, Computational Optimization and Applications, 51, 259, 10.1007/s10589-010-9329-3 · DOI
  48. 10.1107/S1600576720013412 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/s41467-017-00630-4 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.02.016 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1109/JPROC.2004.840301 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 2023, VkFFT-a performant, cross-platform and open-source GPU FFT library, IEEE Access, 11, 12039, 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3242240 · DOI
  55. 2008, Scalable parallel programming with cuda: Is cuda the parallel programming model that application developers have been waiting for?, Queue, 6, 40, 10.1145/1365490.1365500 · DOI
  56. Nishino, R. , and S. H. C. Loomis . 2017. Cupy: A numpy-compatible library for nvidia gpu calculations. 31st confernce on neural information processing systems. 151(7).
  57. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.03.062 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Chamberlain, S. R., Moore, S., & Grant, T. D.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Grant, Thomas D.
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-06-03
Volume
122
Issue
23
Pages
4567-4581
ISSN
0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388209650
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1817862, 1231306)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM133998)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
solution X-ray scattering, hydration shell

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review