The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved computational epitope profiling using structural models identifies a broader diversity of antibodies that bind the same epitope
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1237621 · Paper page
Abstract
The function of an antibody is intrinsically linked to which epitope it engages. Clonal clustering methods, based on sequence identity, are commonly used to group antibodies that will bind the same epitope. However, such methods neglect the fact that antibodies with highly diverse sequences can exhibit similar binding site geometries and engage common epitopes. In a previous study we described SPACE1, a method that structurally clustered antibodies in order to predict their epitopes. This methodology was limited by the inaccuracies and incomplete coverage of template-based modelling. It was also only benchmarked at the level of domain-consistency on one virus class. Here, we present SPACE2, which uses the latest machine learning based structure prediction technology combined with a novel clustering protocol and benchmark it on binding data that has epitope level resolution. On six diverse sets of antigen specific antibodies we demonstrate that SPACE2 accurately clusters antibodies that engage common epitopes and achieves far higher data set coverage than clonal clustering and SPACE1. Furthermore, we show that the functionally consistent structural clusters identified by SPACE2 are even more diverse in sequence, genetic lineage, and species origin than those found by SPACE1. These results reiterate that structural data improves our ability to identify antibodies that bind the same epitope, adding information to sequence-based methods, especially in data sets of antibodies from diverse sources. SPACE2 is openly available on Github ( https://github.com/oxpig/SPACE2 ).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.1039/C5IB00169B · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1595-3 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-019-0879-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.1673 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1219320110 · DOI
- 10.1080/19420862.2019.1584517 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-7841-0_1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ab.2008.11.038 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00899 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.it.2015.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009675 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/19420862.2021.1873478 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1207227 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.043 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/19420862.2020.1869406 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- Brennan Abanades , Wing Ki Wong , Fergus Boyles , Guy Georges , Alexander Bujotzek , and Charlotte M. Deane . ImmuneBuilder: Deep-Learning models for predicting the structures of immune proteins, December 2022. · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa457 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100406 · DOI · Paper page
- Jeffrey A. Ruffolo , Lee-Shin Chu , Sai Pooja Mahajan , and Jeffrey J. Gray . Fast, accurate antibody structure prediction from deep learning on massive set of natural antibodies, April 2022. · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-022-05644-7 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa739 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkab1050 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt1043 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/19420862.2016.1205773 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.22658 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/widm.53 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1136800 · DOI
- 10.1145/3068335 · DOI
- 10.1145/304181.304187 · DOI
- 1967, Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations, Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, 281
- 10.1524/auto.2011.0951 · DOI
- 10.1021/ci9803381 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac732 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0145-305X(02)00039-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.030 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature07082 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz921 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.adc9498 · DOI
- 10.1080/19420862.2021.1996732 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-022-05371-z · DOI
- Bora Guloglu and Charlotte M. Deane . Specific attributes of the VL domain influence both the structure and structural variability of CDR-H3 through steric effects, May 2023. · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.4205 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Spoendlin, F. C., Abanades, B., Raybould, M. I. J., Wong, W. K., Georges, G., & Deane, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Deane, Charlotte M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-06-09
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 1237621-1237621
- ISSN
- 2296-889X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10544996
- OpenAlex
- W4386864280
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/S024093, EP/S024093/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- epitope prediction, antigen-specific antibodies, template-based modeling, antibody repertoire
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review