The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitive remote homology search by local alignment of small positional embeddings from protein language models
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.7554/elife.91415.3
Abstract
Accurately detecting distant evolutionary relationships between proteins remains an ongoing challenge in bioinformatics. Search methods based on primary sequence struggle to accurately detect homology between sequences with less than 20% amino acid identity. Profile- and structure-based strategies extend sensitive search capabilities into this twilight zone of sequence similarity but require slow pre-processing steps. Recently, whole-protein and positional embeddings from deep neural networks have shown promise for providing sensitive sequence comparison and annotation at long evolutionary distances. Embeddings are generally faster to compute than profiles and predicted structures but still suffer several drawbacks related to the ability of whole-protein embeddings to discriminate domain-level homology, and the database size and search speed of methods using positional embeddings. In this work, we show that low-dimensionality positional embeddings can be used directly in speed-optimized local search algorithms. As a proof of concept, we use the ESM2 3B model to convert primary sequences directly into the 3Di alphabet or amino acid profiles and use these embeddings as input to the highly optimized Foldseek, HMMER3, and HH-suite search algorithms. Our results suggest that positional embeddings as small as a single byte can provide sufficient information for dramatically improved sensitivity over amino acid sequence searches without sacrificing search speed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,990
Using deep learning to annotate the protein universe
Bileschi, M. L., Belanger, D., Bryant, D. H., Sanderson, T., Carter, B., Sculley, D., Bateman, A., DePristo, M. A., & Colwell, L. J. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01179-w · Cited by 332
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0213712 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gky1134 · DOI
- Devlin J , Chang M-W , Lee K , Toutanova K. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. arXiv:181004805 [cs].
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3095381 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2022.07.25.501437 · DOI
- 10.1101/2023.07.23.550085 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkac387 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-023-47204-7 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-11-431 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad579 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.2211823120 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/gb-2009-10-2-207 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad786 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac724 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkac1080 · DOI
- 10.1093/protein/12.2.85 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7554/eLife.80942 · DOI
- 10.3389/fbinf.2022.1033775 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2105-15-7 · DOI
- 10.22541/au.168534397.72964200/v1 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, S. R., Peshwa, M., & Sun, Z.
- Affiliations
- New England Biolabs (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Johnson, Sean R.
- Sun, Zhiyi
- Venue
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-07-29
- OpenAlex
- W4385379787
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- remote homology detection, positional encoding, protein language models, ESM-2, local alignment, sequence similarity search, amino acid composition, Foldseek, low-dimensional embedding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review