PreprintCited by 0Machine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sensitive remote homology search by local alignment of small positional embeddings from protein language models

Open access
Johnson, Sean R., Peshwa, Meghana, Sun, Zhiyi·2023·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.7554/elife.91415.3

Abstract

Accurately detecting distant evolutionary relationships between proteins remains an ongoing challenge in bioinformatics. Search methods based on primary sequence struggle to accurately detect homology between sequences with less than 20% amino acid identity. Profile- and structure-based strategies extend sensitive search capabilities into this twilight zone of sequence similarity but require slow pre-processing steps. Recently, whole-protein and positional embeddings from deep neural networks have shown promise for providing sensitive sequence comparison and annotation at long evolutionary distances. Embeddings are generally faster to compute than profiles and predicted structures but still suffer several drawbacks related to the ability of whole-protein embeddings to discriminate domain-level homology, and the database size and search speed of methods using positional embeddings. In this work, we show that low-dimensionality positional embeddings can be used directly in speed-optimized local search algorithms. As a proof of concept, we use the ESM2 3B model to convert primary sequences directly into the 3Di alphabet or amino acid profiles and use these embeddings as input to the highly optimized Foldseek, HMMER3, and HH-suite search algorithms. Our results suggest that positional embeddings as small as a single byte can provide sufficient information for dramatically improved sensitivity over amino acid sequence searches without sacrificing search speed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.07.26.550718

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1371/journal.pone.0213712 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/nar/gky1134 · DOI
  7. Devlin J , Chang M-W , Lee K , Toutanova K. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. arXiv:181004805 [cs].
  8. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3095381 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1101/2022.07.25.501437 · DOI
  11. 10.1101/2023.07.23.550085 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/nar/gkac387 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41598-023-47204-7 · DOI
  15. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-431 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad579 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1073/pnas.2211823120 · DOI
  19. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1186/gb-2009-10-2-207 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad786 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac724 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/nar/gkac1080 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/protein/12.2.85 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.7554/eLife.80942 · DOI
  29. 10.3389/fbinf.2022.1033775 · DOI
  30. 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1186/1471-2105-15-7 · DOI
  35. 10.22541/au.168534397.72964200/v1 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, S. R., Peshwa, M., & Sun, Z.
Affiliations
New England Biolabs (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Johnson, Sean R.
  • Sun, Zhiyi
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-07-29
OpenAlex
W4385379787
Cited by
0
References
3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
remote homology detection, positional encoding, protein language models, ESM-2, local alignment, sequence similarity search, amino acid composition, Foldseek, low-dimensional embedding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review