PreprintCited by 15CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eukaryotic-driven directed evolution of Cas9 nucleases

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1186/s13059-024-03215-9

Abstract

Full exploitation of the natural reservoir of CRISPR-Cas nucleases from prokaryotes for genome editing is limited by the suboptimal activity of these enzymes in mammalian cells. Here we developed a E ukaryotic P latform to Improve C as A ctivity (EPICA) to steer weakly active Cas9 nucleases into highly active enzymes by directed evolution. The EPICA platform is obtained by coupling Cas nuclease activity with yeast auxotrophic selection followed by mammalian cell selection through a sensitive reporter system. EPICA was validated with a poorly efficient Cas9 nuclease from Campylobacter jejuni , CjCas9, generating an enhanced variant, UltraCjCas9, following directed evolution rounds. UltraCjCas9 was up to 12-fold more active in mammalian endogenous genomic loci, while preserving high genome-wide specificity. Here we report a eukaryotic pipeline allowing enhancement of Cas9 systems, setting the ground to unlock the multitude of RNA-guided nucleases existing in nature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.09.18.558227

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1038/nature24644 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.abj6856 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/s41586-021-04058-1 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/s41586-023-06356-2 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41586-020-1978-5 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2019, The next generation of CRISPR-Cas technologies and applications, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 20, 490, 10.1038/s41580-019-0131-5 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1099/mic.0.023960-0 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2022, Automated identification of sequence-tailored Cas9 proteins using massive metagenomic data, Nat. Commun, 13, 6474, 10.1038/s41467-022-34213-9 · DOI
  10. 2022, Efficient in vivo base editing via single adeno-associated viruses with size-optimized genomes encoding compact adenine base editors, Nat Biomed Eng, 6, 1272, 10.1038/s41551-022-00911-4 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.023 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41467-020-19344-1 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41579-019-0299-x · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.cell.2022.10.020 · DOI
  15. 2022, Engineered Campylobacter jejuni Cas9 variant with enhanced activity and broader targeting range, Commun Biol, 5, 211, 10.1038/s42003-022-03149-7 · DOI
  16. 2021, Author Correction: AsCas12a ultra nuclease facilitates the rapid generation of therapeutic cell medicines, Nat. Commun, 12, 4500, 10.1038/s41467-021-24770-w · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s41587-021-01009-z · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nature14299 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/nbt.4066 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/ncomms14500 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2020, Comparison of CRISPR/Cas Endonucleases for in vivo Retinal Gene Editing, Front. Cell. Neurosci, 14, 570917, 10.3389/fncel.2020.570917 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.02.023 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/nbt.3117 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1021/acssynbio.5b00299 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/nbt.2889 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/nar/gkw524 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.1810062115 · DOI
  28. R. S. Isaac , et al., Nucleosome breathing and remodeling constrain CRISPR-Cas9 function. Elife 5 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  29. M. A. Horlbeck , et al., Nucleosomes impede Cas9 access to DNA in vivo and in vitro. Elife 5 (2016). · DOI
  30. I. Strohkendl , et al., Inhibition of CRISPR-Cas12a DNA targeting by nucleosomes and chromatin. Sci Adv 7 (2021). · DOI
  31. 2019, Improving CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing Efficiency by Fusion with Chromatin-Modulating Peptides, CRISPR J, 2, 51, 10.1089/crispr.2018.0036 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41594-019-0206-1 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.09.015 · DOI
  34. 2022, Reversible regulation of Cas12a activities by AcrVA5-mediated acetylation and CobB-mediated deacetylation, Cell Discov, 8, 45, 10.1038/s41421-022-00396-0 · DOI
  35. T. Ergünay , et al., Sumoylation of Cas9 at lysine 848 regulates protein stability and DNA binding. Life Sci Alliance 5 (2022). · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nature14592 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1038/s41587-018-0011-0 · DOI
  38. 10.1126/science.aad5227 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.007 · DOI
  40. 2019, Structural basis for the promiscuous PAM recognition by Corynebacterium diphtheriae Cas9, Nat. Commun, 10, 1968, 10.1038/s41467-019-09741-6 · DOI
  41. 2020, The molecular basis for recognition of 5’-NNNCC-3’ PAM and its methylation state by Acidothermus cellulolyticus Cas9, Nat. Commun, 11, 6346, 10.1038/s41467-020-20204-1 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/s41594-021-00632-3 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/s41587-023-01857-x · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.06.011 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/nprot.2007.13 · DOI
  46. 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1038/nmeth.1923 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 2019, PaCBAM: fast and scalable processing of whole exome and targeted sequencing data, BMC Genomics, 20, 1018, 10.1186/s12864-019-6386-6 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/nar/gku936 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 2017, Hit and go CAS9 delivered through a lentiviral based self-limiting circuit, Nat. Commun, 8, 15334, 10.1038/ncomms15334 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1186/s13059-019-1625-3 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1093/nar/gkac387 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/PRO.3943 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Ruta, G. V., Ciciani, M., Kheir, E., Gentile, M. D., Amistadi, S., Casini, A., & Cereseto, A.
Affiliations
University of Trento (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Ruta, Giulia Vittoria
  • Cereseto, Anna
Venue
Genome biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-09-18
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
79-79
ISSN
1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393159098
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, 825825)
  • Università degli Studi di Trento
  • HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme (825825)
  • Horizon 2020 (825825)
  • HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council (01071041)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Keywords
Cas9 nuclease, directed evolution, genome editing, reporter system, RNA-guided nucleases
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Animals, Mammals, Genome, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review