The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unsupervised learning reveals landscape of local structural motifs across protein classes
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf377
Abstract
Proteins are known to share similarities in local regions of 3D structure even across disparate global folds. Such correspondences can help to shed light on functional relationships between proteins and identify conserved local structural features that lead to function. Self-supervised deep learning on large protein structure datasets has produced high-fidelity representations of local structural microenvironments, enabling comparison of local structure and function at scale. In this work, we leverage these representations to cluster over 15 million environments in the Protein Data Bank, resulting in the creation of a “lexicon” of local 3D motifs which form the building blocks of all known protein structures. We characterize these motifs and demonstrate that they provide valuable information for modeling structure and function at all scales of protein analysis, from full protein chains to binding pockets to individual amino acids. We devise a new protein representation based solely on its constituent local motifs and show that this representation enables state-of-the-art performance on protein structure search and model quality assessment. We then show that this approach enables accurate prediction of drug off-target interactions by modeling the similarity between local binding pockets. Finally, we identify structural motifs associated with pathogenic variants in the human proteome by leveraging the predicted structures in the AlphaFold structure database.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 55
- 10.1093/nar/gkz1064 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkab1054 · DOI
- 2021, CATH: increased structural coverage of functional space, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, D266, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1079 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00992-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2005.05.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.04.007 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0907971106 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt1130 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0424 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00942-7 · DOI
- Rohl, C. A. , Strauss, C. E. M. , Misura, K. M. S. & Baker, D. Protein structure prediction using rosetta. In Methods in Enzymology, vol. 383, 66–93 (Academic Press, 2004). · DOI
- 10.1186/gb-2008-9-3-r52 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.340050410 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1993 · DOI
- 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4391 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.05.067 · DOI · Paper page
- Zemla, A. , Allen, J. E. , Kirshner, D. & Lightstone, F. C. PDBspheres - a method for finding 3D similarities in local regions in proteins (2022). · DOI
- 1995, Characterizing the microenvironment surrounding protein sites, Protein Sci, 4, 622, 10.1002/pro.5560040404 · DOI
- 2008, The FEATURE framework for protein function annotation: modeling new functions, improving performance, and extending to novel applications, BMC Genomics, 9, S2
- 2010, Identification of recurring protein structure microenvironments and discovery of novel functional sites around CYS residues, BMC Struct. Biol, 10, 4, 10.1186/1472-6807-10-4 · DOI
- 2019, Pocket similarity identifies selective estrogen receptor modulators as microtubule modulators at the taxane site, Nat. Commun, 10, 1033, 10.1038/s41467-019-08965-w · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002326 · DOI
- 2019, Computational analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity using structural knowledge, Bioinformatics, 35, 235, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty582 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003589 · DOI
- Torng, W. & Altman, R. B. Graph convolutional neural networks for predicting Drug-Target interactions (2019). · DOI
- 2007, Clustering protein environments for function prediction: finding PROSITE motifs in 3D, BMC Bioinforma, 8, S10, 10.1186/1471-2105-8-S4-S10 · DOI
- Baek, M. , et al. Efficient and accurate prediction of protein structure using RoseTTAFold2 (2023). · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-27838-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.add2187 · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion, Nature, 620, 1089, 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Townshend, R. J. L. , et al. ATOM3D: Tasks on molecules in three dimensions. In Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 1) (2021).
- 2023, Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense, Science, 0, eadg7492
- van Kempen, M. et al. Fast and accurate protein structure search with foldseek. Nat. Biotechnol. (2023). · DOI · Paper page
- Su, J. , et al. SaProt: Protein language modeling with structure-aware vocabulary (2023). · DOI
- Heinzinger, M. , Weissenow, K. , Sanchez, J. G. , Henkel, A. & others. ProstT5: Bilingual language model for protein sequence and structure. bioRxiv (2023). · DOI · Paper page
- Derry, A. & Altman, R. B . COLLAPSE: A representation learning framework for identification and characterization of protein structural sites. Protein Sci. e4541 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
- Derry, A. & Altman, R. B. Explainable protein function annotation using local structure embeddings. bioRxiv (2023). · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg224 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gks966 · DOI
- Kryshtafovych, A. , Schwede, T. , Topf, M. , Fidelis, K. & Moult, J. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XIII (2019). · DOI · Paper page
- Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. L. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015 - Conference Track Proceedings (2015).
- 10.1093/nar/gkv1082 · DOI
- 10.1021/ci600342e · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt1358 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAC1052 · DOI · Paper page
- Famiglietti, M. L. et al. An enhanced workflow for variant interpretation in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot improves consistency and reuse in ClinVar. Database 2019 (2019). · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrd773 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41573-021-00195-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/nchembio.117 · DOI
- 10.1021/jm901132v · DOI
- 10.1007/s10479-011-0841-3 · DOI
- 2020, Discovery of novel Gain-of-Function mutations guided by Structure-Based deep learning, ACS Synth. Biol, 9, 2927, 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00345 · DOI
- Ljungdahl, A. , et al. AlphaMissense is better correlated with functional assays of missense impact than earlier prediction algorithms. bioRxiv (2023). · DOI
- McDonald, E. F. , Oliver, K. E. , Schlebach, J. P. , Meiler, J. & Plate, L. Benchmarking AlphaMissense pathogenicity predictions against cystic fibrosis variants. bioRxiv (2023). · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Derry, A., & Altman, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Altman, Russ B.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-12-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12258146
- OpenAlex
- W4411695327
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Stanford Research Computing Center, Stanford University
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM102365, R35GM153195)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (T32LM012409)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- protein structure, self-supervised deep learning, protein representation, protein structure search, pathogenic variants, AlphaFold, Protein Data Bank, protein function
- MeSH terms
- Unsupervised Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Computational Biology, Amino Acid Motifs, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review