PreprintCited by 13Environmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How to barcode (almost all) freshwater biodiversity

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1002/edn3.590 · Paper page

Abstract

Freshwater ecosystems are complex, diverse and face a variety of imminent threats that have led to changes in both ecosystem structure and function. It is urgent that we develop and standardize monitoring tools allowing for rapid and comprehensive assessment of freshwater communities to understand their changing dynamics and to inform conservation. Environmental DNA surveys offer a means to inventory and monitor aquatic diversity, yet most studies focus on one or a few taxonomic groups only. In this study, we sought to 1) identify thoroughly validated, cost-efficient primer pair combinations that maximize detection of broad swaths of freshwater diversity, and 2) facilitate future primer pair selection by creating a free online and user-friendly tool. We first evaluated the completeness of public reference sequence databases and the efficiency of 14 primer pairs using an in silico approach, and then performed eDNA surveys using five mock communities (mix of DNA from tissues), water samples from aquarium samples with known taxonomic composition, and finally water samples from freshwater systems in Eastern Canada. We highlight the power of eDNA-based metabarcoding for reconstructing freshwater communities, including prey, parasite, pathogen, invasive, and declining species. Our work reveals the importance of the marker choice on species resolution, as well as the importance of degenerate primers, the length of the target fragment and the filtering parameters on detection success in water eDNA samples. Our new online tool SNIPe revealed that 13 to 14 primer pairs are necessary to recover 100% of the species in water samples (aquarium and natural systems), but four primer pairs are sufficient to recover almost 75% of taxa with little overlap. These results highlight the usefulness of eDNA for freshwater monitoring and should prompt more studies on tools to survey all-inclusive communities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.12.13.571596

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 92

  1. 10.1641/B580507 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113808 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/2041-210X.12849 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/edn3.366 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s13280-014-0566-z · DOI
  6. 10.3402/jom.v6.23408 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s10531-020-01980-0 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/nar/gkm929 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/edn3.129 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.tree.2014.04.003 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1021/acs.est.8b01071 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/edn3.120 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/2041-210X.13276 · DOI
  15. 10.1186/1746-5354-3-2-29 · DOI
  16. 10.1071/MF14173 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0562 · DOI
  18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0088786 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/ncomms12544 · DOI
  20. 10.1371/journal.pone.0023398 · DOI
  21. 10.3390/w13030331 · DOI
  22. 10.1017/S1464793105006950 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.7717/peerj.7745 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/2041-210X.12687 · DOI
  25. 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00011 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/1755-0998.13329 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/ece3.7382 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/1755-0998.12338 · DOI
  29. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-434 · DOI
  30. 10.22541/au.166546664.45118988/v1 · DOI
  31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0013102 · DOI
  32. 10.1139/gen-2016-0100 · DOI
  33. 10.1128/mSystems.00032-16 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108522 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/jfb.14383 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/edn3.280 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/2041-210X.12743 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/edn3.241 · DOI
  39. 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1890/09-1249.1 · DOI
  41. 10.1139/gen-2020-0009 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/molbev/mst141 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150587 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s10750-022-04990-x · DOI
  45. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199 · DOI
  46. 10.1101/2021.06.29.450286 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/1755-0998.13746 · DOI
  48. 10.1002/eap.2561 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/s41598-019-48546-x · DOI
  50. 10.1371/journal.pone.0177643 · DOI
  51. 10.3390/d9040054 · DOI
  52. 10.1128/AEM.01043-13 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/s41598-017-17333-x · DOI
  54. 10.1002/edn3.88 · DOI
  55. 10.1002/edn3.177 · DOI
  56. 10.1186/1742-9994-10-34 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111014 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/s41598-021-90598-5 · DOI
  59. 10.3897/mbmg.7.103856 · DOI
  60. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1038/s41598-023-47462-5 · DOI
  62. 10.1111/ddi.13142 · DOI
  63. 10.1111/1755-0998.13430 · DOI
  64. 10.1093/plankt/fbp061 · DOI
  65. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003531 · DOI
  66. 10.1371/journal.pone.0217084 · DOI
  67. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-214 · DOI
  68. 10.1098/rsos.150088 · DOI
  69. 10.1007/s12562-020-01461-x · DOI
  70. 10.1371/journal.pone.0200177 · DOI
  71. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1111/brv.12480 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1139/f96-068 · DOI
  74. 10.7717/peerj.2584 · DOI
  75. 10.1007/s10530-017-1532-z · DOI
  76. 10.1111/1365-2664.13592 · DOI
  77. 10.1093/molbev/msy074 · DOI
  78. 10.1002/ece3.8239 · DOI
  79. 10.1371/journal.pone.0090234 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.010 · DOI
  81. 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090035 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1038/s41598-017-12501-5 · DOI
  83. 10.1002/edn3.189 · DOI
  84. 10.1002/ece3.6362 · DOI
  85. 10.1371/journal.pone.0114329 · DOI
  86. 10.3390/biology11091277 · DOI
  87. 10.1111/mec.13428 · DOI
  88. 10.1002/edn3.10 · DOI
  89. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.247 · DOI
  90. 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00198.x@10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2435.ECOLOGYCHINA · DOI
  91. Zaiko, Anastasija , Xavier Pochon , Eva Garcia-Vazquez , Sergej Olenin , and Susanna A. Wood . 2018. “Advantages and Limitations of Environmental DNA/RNA Tools for Marine Biosecurity: Management and Surveillance of Non-Indigenous Species.” Frontiers in Marine Science 5. · DOI
  92. 10.1111/2041-210X.12037 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Tournayre, O., Tian, H., Lougheed, D. R., Windle, M. J. S., Lambert, S., Carter, J., Sun, Z., Ridal, J., Wang, Y., Cumming, B. F., Arnott, S. E., & Lougheed, S. C.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • St. Lawrence River Institute of Environmental Sciences (CA)
  • Parks Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Tournayre, Orianne
Venue
Environmental DNA
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-12-14
Volume
6
Issue
4
ISSN
2637-4943 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400926086
Cited by
13
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Environmental DNA (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Queen's University
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
eDNA metabarcoding, primer selection, snipe, mock communities, biodiversity monitoring, aquatic biodiversity, species detection, freshwater conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to barcode (almost all) freshwater biodiversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/2023.12.13.571596
The paper
Tournayre, O., Tian, H., Lougheed, D. R., Windle, M. J. S., Lambert, S., Carter, J., Sun, Z., Ridal, J., Wang, Y., Cumming, B. F., Arnott, S. E., & Lougheed, S. C. (2023). How to barcode (almost all) freshwater biodiversity. Environmental DNA. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.13.571596