PreprintCited by 10Heat shock proteins researchRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analyzing the implications of protein folding delay caused by translation

Open access
Houben, Bert, Duran-Romaña, Ramon, Migens, Paula Fernández, Rousseau, Frederic, Schymkowitz, Joost·2024·Nature Communications

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-025-57033-z · Paper page

Abstract

Because of vectorial protein production, residues that interact in the native protein structure but are distantly separated in the primary sequence are unavailable simultaneously. Instead, there is a temporal delay during which the N-terminal interaction partner is vulnerable to off-pathway, non-native interactions. In this analysis, we introduce “FoldDelay” (FD), a metric that integrates the topological pattern of atomic interactions of the native structure with translation kinetics to quantify such time delays. The FD metric reveals that many proteins, particularly at eukaryotic translation rates, exhibit residues with FDs in the range of tens of seconds. These residues, predominantly in well-structured, buried regions, often coincide with predicted aggregation-prone regions. We show a correlation between FD and co-translational engagement by the yeast Hsp70 chaperone Ssb, suggesting that fold-delayed regions have a propensity to misfold. In support of this, we show that proteins with high FDs are more frequently co-translationally ubiquitinated and prone to aggregate upon Ssb deletion. Finally, we find that FD cannot be adequately reduced through codon optimization, highlighting the importance of co-translational chaperones to shield these vulnerable regions. This work offers insights into co-translational proteostasis and the delicate balance between efficient folding and potential misfolding and aggregation during translation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.01.27.577370

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. 10.1126/science.181.4096.223 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/pro.2551 · DOI
  3. 1998, Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins11Edited by P, E. Wright. J Mol Biol, 277, 985, 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1645 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1128/JB.182.11.3037-3044.2000 · DOI
  6. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-060414-034333 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.1213624110 · DOI
  8. 2019, Nature and Regulation of Protein Folding on the Ribosome, Trends Biochem Sci, 44, 914, 10.1016/j.tibs.2019.06.008 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/10754 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/sciadv.aas9098 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nsmb.1554 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.4291 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.07.035 · DOI
  14. 2021, Nonrefoldability is Pervasive Across the E. coli Proteome, J Am Chem Soc, 143, 11435, 10.1021/jacs.1c03270 · DOI
  15. Huang C , Wagner-Valladolid S , Stephens AD , Jung R , Poudel C , Sinnige T , et al. Intrinsically aggregation-prone proteins form amyloid-like aggregates and contribute to tissue aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Elife. 2019;8. · DOI
  16. 2022, Pulse labeling reveals the tail end of protein folding by proteome profiling, Cell Rep, 40, 111096, 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111096 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2024, The critical role of co-translational folding: An evolutionary and biophysical perspective, Current Opinion in Systems Biology, 37, 100485, 10.1016/j.coisb.2023.100485 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/s41594-018-0029-5 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Cassaignau AME , Włodarski T , Chan SHS , Woodburn LF , Bukvin IV , Streit JO , et al. Interactions between nascent proteins and the ribosome surface inhibit co-translational folding. Nature Chemistry. 2021. · DOI
  20. Deckert A , Cassaignau AME , Wang X , Wlodarski T , Chan SHS , Waudby CA , et al. Common sequence motifs of nascent chains engage the ribosome surface and trigger factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118. · DOI
  21. Deuerling E , Gamerdinger M , Kreft SG . Chaperone Interactions at the Ribosome. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2019;11. · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nature02899 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.001 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.038 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.036 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/35008096 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/s41598-018-36992-y · DOI
  28. 10.1021/ja064865+ · DOI
  29. 1998, Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins11Edited by P, E. Wright. J Mol Biol, 277, 985, 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1645 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/nar/gkt1240 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1093/nar/gkab1054 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.7554/eLife.32764 · DOI
  34. 2019, The Hsp70 chaperone network, Nature reviews molecular cell biology, 20, 665, 10.1038/s41580-019-0133-3 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.03.002 · DOI
  36. 2020, The ribosome-associated complex RAC serves in a relay that directs nascent chains to Ssb, Nature communications, 11, 1504, 10.1038/s41467-020-15313-w · DOI
  37. 10.1093/emboj/16.7.1501 · DOI
  38. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000475 · DOI
  39. 10.1242/jcs.107029 · DOI
  40. 10.1242/bio.20148938 · DOI
  41. 10.1083/jcb.201709072 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.03.010 · DOI
  43. 2015, Mean of the Typical Decoding Rates: A New Translation Efficiency Index Based on the Analysis of Ribosome Profiling Data, G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics, 5, 73 LP, 10.1534/g3.114.015099 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/pro.3336 · DOI
  45. 2019, A chemical kinetic basis for measuring translation initiation and elongation rates from ribosome profiling data, PLoS Comput Biol, 15, e1007070, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007070 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.058 · DOI
  47. 2021, “Protein aggregates” contain RNA and DNA, entrapped by misfolded proteins but largely rescued by slowing translational elongation, Aging Cell, 20, e13326, 10.1111/acel.13326 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.038 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/41024 · DOI
  50. 2022, Cotranslational Mechanisms of Protein Biogenesis and Complex Assembly in Eukaryotes, Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science, 5, 67, 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-121721-095858 · DOI
  51. 2024, How the ribosome shapes cotranslational protein folding, Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 84, 102740, 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102740 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.022 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.12.009 · DOI
  54. 10.1093/nar/gki387 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1093/nar/gkq1105 · DOI
  57. 10.1371/journal.pone.0080635 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/nbt1012 · DOI
  59. 10.1126/science.1257522 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Wickham H . Data analysis. ggplot2: Springer; 2016. p. 189–201. · DOI
  61. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu393 · DOI
  62. 10.1002/pro.3235 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Houben, B., Duran-Romaña, R., Migens, P. F., Rousseau, F., & Schymkowitz, J.
Affiliations
VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research (BE)
Corresponding author
Schymkowitz, Joost
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-01-27
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
1673-1673
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407595534
Cited by
10
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (12S3722N, G0A6724N, C0401, G053420N)
  • KU Leuven (C0401, PDMT2/24/084)
  • Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (C0401, PDMT2/24/084, G053420N)
  • Vlaamse regering (PDMT2/24/084)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
co-translational folding, protein aggregation, sugar-sweetened beverages, Hsp70 chaperones, ubiquitination, protein topology, translation kinetics, protein misfolding, yeast
MeSH terms
DNA-Binding Proteins, Kinetics, Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Protein Biosynthesis, Protein Folding, Molecular Chaperones, HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Ubiquitination, Protein Aggregates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review