PreprintCited by 10Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

One-step N-terminomics based on isolation of protein N-terminal peptides from LysargiNase digests by tip-based strong cation exchange chromatography

Open access
Morikawa, Kazuya, Nishida, Hiroshi, Imami, Koshi, Ishihama, Yasushi·2024·Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100820

Abstract

We have developed a one-step isolation method for protein N-terminal peptides from LysargiNase digests by pipette tip-based strong cation exchange (SCX) chromatography. This CHAMP-N (CHromatographic AMplification of Protein N-terminal peptides) method using disposable and parallel-processable SCX tips instead of conventional HPLC SCX columns facilitates simple, sensitive and high-throughput N-terminomic profiling without sacrificing the high identification numbers and selectivity achieved by the HPLC-based method. By applying the CHAMP-N method to HEK293T cells, we identified novel cleavage sites for signal and transit peptides, and non-canonical translation initiation sites. Finally, for proteome-wide terminomics, we present a simple and comprehensive N-and C-terminomics platform employing three different tip-based approaches, including CHAMP-N, in which protease digestion and one-step isolation by tip LC are commonly used to achieve complementary terminome coverages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.02.06.579163

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 2019, A five-level classification system for proteoform identifications, Nat. Methods, 16, 939, 10.1038/s41592-019-0573-x · DOI
  2. Consortium for Top-Down Proteomics, 2021, The Human Proteoform Project: Defining the human proteome, Sci Adv, 7, eabk0734, 10.1126/sciadv.abk0734 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1186/1752-153X-3-11 · DOI
  4. 2019, Novel oncogene 5MP1 reprograms c-Myc translation initiation to drive malignant phenotypes in colorectal cancer, EBioMedicine, 44, 387, 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.05.058 · DOI
  5. 10.1101/gad.8.20.2441 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90507-7 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1007/s12017-009-8104-z · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1073/pnas.1816596116 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/nbt810 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nbt.1611 · DOI
  11. Hanna, R. , Rozenberg, A. , Saied, L. , Ben-Yosef, D. , Lavy, T. , and Kleifeld, O . (2023) In-Depth Characterization of Apoptosis N-Terminome Reveals a Link Between Caspase-3 Cleavage and Posttranslational N-Terminal Acetylation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 22, · DOI
  12. 2021, Isolation of Acetylated and Unmodified Protein N-Terminal Peptides by Strong Cation Exchange Chromatographic Separation of TrypN-Digested Peptides, Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 20, 100003, 10.1074/mcp.TIR120.002148 · DOI
  13. 2022, One-Step Isolation of Protein C-Terminal Peptides from V8 Protease-Digested Proteins by Metal Oxide-Based Ligand-Exchange Chromatography, Anal. Chem, 94, 944, 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03722 · DOI
  14. 2021, Exploring the landscape of ectodomain shedding by quantitative protein terminomics, iScience, 24, 102259, 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102259 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1021/ac9004309 · DOI
  16. 2010, Peptide orientation affects selectivity in ion-exchange chromatography, Anal. Chem, 82, 5253, 10.1021/ac100651k · DOI
  17. 10.1074/mcp.M900463-MCP200 · DOI
  18. 2021, A protocol for analyzing the protein terminome of human cancer cell line culture supernatants, STAR Protoc, 2, 100682, 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100682 · DOI
  19. 10.1021/pr700658q · DOI
  20. 10.1021/ac026117i · DOI
  21. 10.1038/nprot.2007.261 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01402-4 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02233 · DOI
  24. 2008, MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p, p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol, 26, 1367
  25. 10.1021/pr101065j · DOI
  26. 2014, Characterization and usage of the EASY-spray technology as part of an online 2D SCX-RP ultra-high pressure system, Analyst, 139, 6520, 10.1039/C4AN01568A · DOI
  27. 2016, Development of Online pH Gradient-Eluted Strong Cation Exchange Nanoelectrospray-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Proteomic Analysis Facilitating Basic and Histidine-Containing Peptides Identification, Anal. Chem, 88, 583, 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04000 · DOI
  28. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01232 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.02.007 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1073/pnas.1207846109 · DOI
  32. 10.1126/science.aay0262 · DOI
  33. 2021, Combinatorial analysis of translation dynamics reveals eIF2 dependence of translation initiation at near-cognate codons, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, 7298, 10.1093/nar/gkab549 · DOI
  34. Almagro Armenteros, J. J. , Salvatore, M. , Emanuelsson, O. , Winther, O. , von Heijne, G. , Elofsson, A. , and Nielsen, H. (2019) Detecting sequence signals in targeting peptides using deep learning. Life Sci Alliance 2, · DOI
  35. 2022, SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models, Nat. Biotechnol, 40, 1023, 10.1038/s41587-021-01156-3 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/nar/gku1012 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Morikawa, K., Nishida, H., Imami, K., & Ishihama, Y.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Ishihama, Yasushi
Venue
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-02-07
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
100820-100820
ISSN
1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401056525
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (CREST, No. JP18gm1010010, JP18gm1010010)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21H02459, 23H04924, 23K18185, 20H03241, CREST)
  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (JPMJCR1862, JP18gm1010010)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
N-terminomics, strong cation exchange chromatography, signal peptide cleavage site, proteolytic digestion
MeSH terms
Chromatography, Ion Exchange, Humans, Peptides, Proteome, Proteomics, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review