PreprintCited by 28Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protein Embeddings Predict Binding Residues in Disordered Regions

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41598-024-64211-4

Abstract

The identification of protein binding residues helps to understand their biological processes as protein function is often defined through ligand binding, such as to other proteins, small molecules, ions, or nucleotides. Methods predicting binding residues often err for intrinsically disordered proteins or regions (IDPs/IDPRs), often also referred to as molecular recognition features (MoRFs). Here, we presented a novel machine learning (ML) model trained to specifically predict binding regions in IDPRs. The proposed model, IDBindT5, leveraged embeddings from the protein language model (pLM) ProtT5 to reach a balanced accuracy of 57.2±3.6% (95% confidence interval). Assessed on the same data set, this did not differ at the 95% CI from the state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods ANCHOR2 and DeepDISOBind that rely on expert-crafted features and evolutionary information from multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). Assessed on differ data, methods such as SPOT-MoRF reached higher MCCs. IDBindT5’s SOTA predictions are much faster than other methods, easily enabling full-proteome analyses. Our findings emphasize the potential of pLMs as a promising approach for exploring and predicting features of disordered proteins. The model and a comprehensive manual are publicly available at https://github.com/jahnl/binding_in_disorder .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.03.05.583540

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 2013, What’s in a name? Why these proteins are intrinsically disordered, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins, 1, e24157, 10.4161/idp.24157 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00736-2 · DOI
  3. 10.3390/molecules21081090 · DOI
  4. 1998, Protein disorder and the evolution of molecular recognition: theory, predictions and observations, Pac Symp Biocomput, 3, 473
  5. 10.1002/bies.200800151 · DOI
  6. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3110 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/nar/gkz975 · DOI
  8. 10.1101/2023.04.28.538739 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa110 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz691 · DOI
  11. Zhang, T. , Faraggi, E. , Li, Z. & Zhou, Y. in Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure (eds Yaoqi Zhou , Andrzej Kloczkowski , Eshel Faraggi , & Yuedong Yang ) 159–174 (Springer New York, 2017).
  12. 10.1002/prot.23161 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1093/nar/gky384 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/prot.26582 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/pro.4466 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3095381 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1073/pnas.2019053118 · DOI
  19. 10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1186/s12859-019-3220-8 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2020, Progen: Language modeling for protein generation, arXiv preprint
  22. 10.1038/s41598-021-03431-4 · DOI
  23. 10.1186/s12859-022-04873-x · DOI
  24. 10.1002/cpz1.113 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s00439-021-02411-y · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.str.2022.05.001 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/pro.4497 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1038/s41587-021-01156-3 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/nar/gkac439 · DOI
  30. 10.3389/fbinf.2022.1019597 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/nar/gkac1065 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/nar/gkt1010 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/bib/bbab521 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.3389/fbinf.2022.1019597 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/prot.25585 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/nar/gkac1052 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx640 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/nar/gkab975 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx486 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/nar/gkg620 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1057 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1045 · DOI
  46. 2018, Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding, arXiv preprint
  47. 10.48550/arXiv.1910.10683 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1038/s41467-018-04964-5 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 2019, PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
  50. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. L. in ICLR 2015 15 (2015).
  51. 10.1093/nar/gkm998 · DOI
  52. Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. in An Introduction to the Bootstrap Ch. The bootstrap algorithm for estimating standard errors, 47 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1002/pro.4524 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Jahn, L. R., Marquet, C., Heinzinger, M., & Rost, B.
Affiliations
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Marquet, Céline
Venue
Scientific Reports
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-03-06
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
13566-13566
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399567091
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 3
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-GZ: RO1320/4-1, RO1320/4‐1)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Technische Universität München
  • Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
intrinsically disordered proteins, intrinsically disordered regions, molecular recognition features, protein language models, ProtT5, protein embeddings, ligand binding, machine learning prediction
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Binding Sites, Humans, Protein Binding, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review