The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein Embeddings Predict Binding Residues in Disordered Regions
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41598-024-64211-4
Abstract
The identification of protein binding residues helps to understand their biological processes as protein function is often defined through ligand binding, such as to other proteins, small molecules, ions, or nucleotides. Methods predicting binding residues often err for intrinsically disordered proteins or regions (IDPs/IDPRs), often also referred to as molecular recognition features (MoRFs). Here, we presented a novel machine learning (ML) model trained to specifically predict binding regions in IDPRs. The proposed model, IDBindT5, leveraged embeddings from the protein language model (pLM) ProtT5 to reach a balanced accuracy of 57.2±3.6% (95% confidence interval). Assessed on the same data set, this did not differ at the 95% CI from the state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods ANCHOR2 and DeepDISOBind that rely on expert-crafted features and evolutionary information from multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). Assessed on differ data, methods such as SPOT-MoRF reached higher MCCs. IDBindT5’s SOTA predictions are much faster than other methods, easily enabling full-proteome analyses. Our findings emphasize the potential of pLMs as a promising approach for exploring and predicting features of disordered proteins. The model and a comprehensive manual are publicly available at https://github.com/jahnl/binding_in_disorder .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- 2013, What’s in a name? Why these proteins are intrinsically disordered, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins, 1, e24157, 10.4161/idp.24157 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00736-2 · DOI
- 10.3390/molecules21081090 · DOI
- 1998, Protein disorder and the evolution of molecular recognition: theory, predictions and observations, Pac Symp Biocomput, 3, 473
- 10.1002/bies.200800151 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3110 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkz975 · DOI
- 10.1101/2023.04.28.538739 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa110 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz691 · DOI
- Zhang, T. , Faraggi, E. , Li, Z. & Zhou, Y. in Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure (eds Yaoqi Zhou , Andrzej Kloczkowski , Eshel Faraggi , & Yuedong Yang ) 159–174 (Springer New York, 2017).
- 10.1002/prot.23161 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gky384 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.26582 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.4466 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3095381 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.2019053118 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12859-019-3220-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Progen: Language modeling for protein generation, arXiv preprint
- 10.1038/s41598-021-03431-4 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-022-04873-x · DOI
- 10.1002/cpz1.113 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00439-021-02411-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2022.05.001 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.4497 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41587-021-01156-3 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac439 · DOI
- 10.3389/fbinf.2022.1019597 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac1065 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt1010 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbab521 · DOI
- 10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fbinf.2022.1019597 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.25585 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac1052 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx640 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkab975 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx486 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkg620 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1057 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1045 · DOI
- 2018, Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding, arXiv preprint
- 10.48550/arXiv.1910.10683 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-018-04964-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
- Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. L. in ICLR 2015 15 (2015).
- 10.1093/nar/gkm998 · DOI
- Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. in An Introduction to the Bootstrap Ch. The bootstrap algorithm for estimating standard errors, 47 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.4524 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Jahn, L. R., Marquet, C., Heinzinger, M., & Rost, B.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Marquet, Céline
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-03-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13566-13566
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11169622
- OpenAlex
- W4399567091
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-GZ: RO1320/4-1, RO1320/4‐1)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Technische Universität München
- Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- intrinsically disordered proteins, intrinsically disordered regions, molecular recognition features, protein language models, ProtT5, protein embeddings, ligand binding, machine learning prediction
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Binding Sites, Humans, Protein Binding, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review