PreprintCited by 1Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GDFold2: a fast and parallelizable protein folding environment with freely defined objective functions

Open access
Mi, Tianyu, Xiao, Nan, Gong, Haipeng·2024·Protein Science

Preprint — published as 10.1002/pro.70041 · Paper page

Abstract

An important step of mainstream protein structure prediction is to model the 3D protein structure based on the predicted 2D inter-residue geometric information. This folding step has been integrated into a unified neural network to allow end-to-end training in state-of-the-art methods like AlphaFold2, but is separately implemented using the Rosetta folding environment in some traditional methods like trRosetta. Despite the inferiority in prediction accuracy, the conventional approach allows for the sampling of various protein conformations compatible with the predicted geometric constraints, partially capturing the dynamic information. Here, we propose GDFold2, a novel protein folding environment, to address the limitations of Rosetta. On the one hand, GDFold2 is highly computationally efficient, capable of accomplishing multiple folding processes in parallel within the time scale of minutes for generic proteins. On the other hand, GDFold2 supports freely defined objective functions to fulfill diversified optimization requirements. Moreover, we propose a quality assessment (QA) model to provide reliable prediction on the quality of protein structures folded by GDFold2, thus substantially simplifying the selection of structural models. GDFold2 and the QA model could be combined to investigate the transition path between protein conformational states, and the online server is available at https://structpred.life.tsinghua.edu.cn/server_gdfold2.html .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.03.13.584741

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1007/978-3-319-19920-7_2 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/prot.26545 · DOI
  3. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005324 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00125 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1101/2022.11.20.517210 · DOI
  9. 10.1101/2022.08.04.502811 · DOI
  10. 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/s41592-023-02130-4 · DOI
  12. 10.1126/science.adl2528 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1038/s42256-024-00792-z · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1101/2022.07.21.500999 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/s42256-023-00721-6 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1073/pnas.2308788121 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/s41587-022-01432-w · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/s43588-022-00373-3 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/s41467-024-51776-x · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1101/2024.02.02.578551 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/s42256-019-0130-4 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1079 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Jing, B. , Eismann, S. , Suriana, P. , et al. Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptrons in International Conference on Learning Representations (2021). https://openreview.net/forum?id=1YLJDvSx6J4.
  27. 2020, Fast Differentiable Sorting and Ranking in INTERNATIONAL CON-FERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 119, International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), ELECTR NETWORK, JUL, 119, 13
  28. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1093/ije/dyq191 · DOI
  31. 10.1021/jacs.7b12191 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq007 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Mi, T., Xiao, N., & Gong, H.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Gong, Haipeng
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-03-14
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
e70041-e70041
ISSN
0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406914184
Cited by
1
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171243)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2023YFF1204400)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein folding, protein structure prediction, Rosetta, quality evaluation model
MeSH terms
Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Neural Networks, Computer, Protein Folding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review