The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GDFold2: a fast and parallelizable protein folding environment with freely defined objective functions
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/pro.70041 · Paper page
Abstract
An important step of mainstream protein structure prediction is to model the 3D protein structure based on the predicted 2D inter-residue geometric information. This folding step has been integrated into a unified neural network to allow end-to-end training in state-of-the-art methods like AlphaFold2, but is separately implemented using the Rosetta folding environment in some traditional methods like trRosetta. Despite the inferiority in prediction accuracy, the conventional approach allows for the sampling of various protein conformations compatible with the predicted geometric constraints, partially capturing the dynamic information. Here, we propose GDFold2, a novel protein folding environment, to address the limitations of Rosetta. On the one hand, GDFold2 is highly computationally efficient, capable of accomplishing multiple folding processes in parallel within the time scale of minutes for generic proteins. On the other hand, GDFold2 supports freely defined objective functions to fulfill diversified optimization requirements. Moreover, we propose a quality assessment (QA) model to provide reliable prediction on the quality of protein structures folded by GDFold2, thus substantially simplifying the selection of structural models. GDFold2 and the QA model could be combined to investigate the transition path between protein conformational states, and the online server is available at https://structpred.life.tsinghua.edu.cn/server_gdfold2.html .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Predicting multiple conformations via sequence clustering and AlphaFold2
Wayment-Steele, H. K., Ojoawo, A., Otten, R., Apitz, J. M., Pitsawong, W., Hömberger, M., Ovchinnikov, S., Colwell, L., & Kern, D. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06832-9 · Cited by 545
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- 10.1007/978-3-319-19920-7_2 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.26545 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005324 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00125 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2022.11.20.517210 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.08.04.502811 · DOI
- 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-023-02130-4 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.adl2528 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s42256-024-00792-z · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2022.07.21.500999 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s42256-023-00721-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.2308788121 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-022-01432-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s43588-022-00373-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-024-51776-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2024.02.02.578551 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42256-019-0130-4 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa1079 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
- Jing, B. , Eismann, S. , Suriana, P. , et al. Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptrons in International Conference on Learning Representations (2021). https://openreview.net/forum?id=1YLJDvSx6J4.
- 2020, Fast Differentiable Sorting and Ranking in INTERNATIONAL CON-FERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 119, International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), ELECTR NETWORK, JUL, 119, 13
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/ije/dyq191 · DOI
- 10.1021/jacs.7b12191 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq007 · DOI
- 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Mi, T., Xiao, N., & Gong, H.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Gong, Haipeng
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-03-14
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e70041-e70041
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11773392
- OpenAlex
- W4406914184
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171243)
- Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2023YFF1204400)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- protein folding, protein structure prediction, Rosetta, quality evaluation model
- MeSH terms
- Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Neural Networks, Computer, Protein Folding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review