The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-strategies embedded framework for neoantigen vaccine maturation
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41598-025-34618-8
Abstract
Effective cancer immunotherapy hinges on the precise recognition of neoantigens, presented as binary complexes with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, by T cell receptors (TCR). The development of immunogenic peptide predictors and generators plays a central role in personalizing immunotherapies while reducing experimental costs. However, the current methods often fall short in leveraging structural data efficiently and providing comprehensive guidance for neoantigen selection. To address these limitations, we introduce NEOM, a novel neoantigen maturation framework encompassing five distinct modules: “policy”, “structure”, “evaluation”, “selection” and “filter”. This framework is designed to enhance precision, interpretability, customizability and cost-effectiveness in neoantigen screening. We evaluated NEOM using a set of random synthetic peptides, followed by available clinically-derived peptides. NEOM achieved higher performance on generated peptide quality compared to other baseline models. Using established predictors for filtering revealed a substantial number of peptides with immunogenic potential. Subsequently, a more rigorous binding affinity evaluation using free energy perturbation methods identified 6 out of 38 candidates showing superior binding characteristics. MHC tetramer peptide exchange assays and flow cytometry experiments further validate five of them. These results demonstrate that NEOM not only excels in identifying diverse peptides with enhanced binding stability and affinity for MHC molecules but also augments their immunogenic potential, showcasing its utility in advancing personalized immunotherapies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- 2022, A guide to antigen processing and presentation, Nat. Rev. Immunol, 22, 751, 10.1038/s41577-022-00707-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 2024, The landscape of neoantigens and its clinical applications: From immunobiology to cancer vaccines, Curr. Res. Biotechnol, 7, 100177, 10.1016/j.crbiot.2024.100177 · DOI
- Minati, R. , Perreault, C. & Thibault, P. A Roadmap Toward the Definition of Actionable Tumor-Specific Antigens. Front. Immunol. 11, (2020). · DOI
- Zhang, Z. et al. Neoantigen: A New Breakthrough in Tumor Immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 12, (2021). · DOI
- 2020, The Origin and Immune Recognition of Tumor-Specific Antigens, Cancers, 12, 2607, 10.3390/cancers12092607 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115625 · DOI
- 10.1038/ni1516 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41571-020-00460-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, Neoantigens: promising targets for cancer therapy, Signal Transduct. Target. Ther, 8, 9, 10.1038/s41392-022-01270-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41573-021-00387-y · DOI
- Biswas, N. , Chakrabarti, S. , Padul, V. , Jones, L. D. & Ashili, S. Designing neoantigen cancer vaccines, trials, and outcomes. Front. Immunol. 14, (2023). · DOI
- 2022, Cancer vaccines as promising immuno-therapeutics: platforms and current progress, J. Hematol. Oncol.J Hematol Oncol, 15, 28, 10.1186/s13045-022-01247-x · DOI
- 2020, A large peptidome dataset improves HLA class I epitope prediction across most of the human population, Nat. Biotechnol, 38, 199, 10.1038/s41587-019-0322-9 · DOI
- 10.1038/351072a0 · DOI
- 10.1002/eji.1830210909 · DOI
- 2023, High-throughput, targeted MHC class I immunopeptidomics using a functional genetics screening platform, Nat. Biotechnol, 41, 980, 10.1038/s41587-022-01566-x · DOI
- 1994, Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains, J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950, 152, 163
- 10.1016/0264-410X(94)00014-E · DOI
- 10.1002/eji.1830260836 · DOI
- 10.1110/ps.0239403 · DOI
- Savoie, C. J. , Kamikawaji, N. , Sasazuki, T. & Kuhara, S. Use of BONSAI decision trees for the identification of potential MHC Class I peptide epitope motifs. in Biocomputing ‘99 182–189 (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 1998). · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19981201)33:4<460::AID-PROT2>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0000796 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00251-008-0341-z · DOI
- 1997, Application of majority voting to pattern recognition: an analysis of its behavior and performance, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. - Part Syst. Hum, 27, 553, 10.1109/3468.618255 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gks438 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv639 · DOI
- 2020, NetMHCpan-4.1 and NetMHCIIpan-4.0: improved predictions of MHC antigen presentation by concurrent motif deconvolution and integration of MS MHC eluted ligand data, Nucleic Acids Res, 48, W449, 10.1093/nar/gkaa379 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, MHCflurry 2.0: Improved Pan-Allele Prediction of MHC Class I-Presented Peptides by Incorporating Antigen Processing, Cell Syst, 11, 42, 10.1016/j.cels.2020.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Impact of Cysteine Residues on MHC Binding Predictions and Recognition by Tumor-Reactive T Cells, J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950, 205, 539
- 10.2174/1568026619666181224101744 · DOI
- Marzella, D. F. et al. PANDORA: A Fast, Anchor-Restrained Modelling Protocol for Peptide: MHC Complexes. Front. Immunol. 13, (2022). · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 2024, Accurate modeling of peptide-MHC structures with AlphaFold, Structure, 32, 228, 10.1016/j.str.2023.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, Peptide-binding specificity prediction using fine-tuned protein structure prediction networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 120, e2216697120, 10.1073/pnas.2216697120 · DOI · Paper page
- 2024, Integrating Reinforcement Learning and Monte Carlo Tree Search for enhanced neoantigen vaccine design, Brief. Bioinform, 25, bbae247, 10.1093/bib/bbae247 · DOI
- 2022, A transformer-based model to predict peptide–HLA class I binding and optimize mutated peptides for vaccine design, Nat. Mach. Intell, 4, 300, 10.1038/s42256-022-00459-7 · DOI
- 2023, Binding peptide generation for MHC Class I proteins with deep reinforcement learning, Bioinformatics, 39, btad055, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad055 · DOI
- 2015, A distinct immunogenic region of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 is naturally processed and presented by human islet cells to cytotoxic CD8 T cells, Clin. Exp. Immunol, 179, 100
- 10.1074/jbc.M116.741603 · DOI
- 10.1172/jci130562 · DOI
- 10.1093/protein/gzm033 · DOI
- 10.1038/ni942 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-022-30342-3 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep04562 · DOI
- 2023, A mutagenesis study of autoantigen optimization for potential T1D vaccine design, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 120, e2214430120, 10.1073/pnas.2214430120 · DOI
- Sim, M. J. W. & Sun, P. D. T Cell Recognition of Tumor Neoantigens and Insights Into T Cell Immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 13, (2022). · DOI
- 10.1111/imm.12984 · DOI
- 2006, Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures, Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc, 15, 2507, 10.1110/ps.062416606 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.12.014 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, G., Fu, Y., Chan, K. C., Jin, R., Yang, Y., & Zhou, R.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, Ruhong
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-08-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4503-4503
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12865018
- OpenAlex
- W7124744431
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.biorxiv.org/about/FAQ#license (vor)
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1967217, 2021YFF1200404, ZJZX2020014)
- Zhejiang University (SN-ZJU-SIAS-003)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFA1306400, 2021YFA1201200, 2024YFA1307500)
- Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (P22KN00272)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Keywords
- HLA-peptide binding, personalized cancer immunotherapy, generative design, Markov chain Monte Carlo, free energy perturbation
- MeSH terms
- Immunoinformatics, Protein Subunit Vaccines, Antigens, Neoplasm, Humans, Markov Chains, Monte Carlo Method, Peptides, Protein Binding, Cancer Vaccines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review