PreprintCited by 4vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-strategies embedded framework for neoantigen vaccine maturation

Open access
Zhang, Guanqiao, Fu, Yaqi, Chan, Kevin C., Jin, Ruofan, Yang, Yuxuan, Zhou, Ruhong·2024·Scientific Reports

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41598-025-34618-8

Abstract

Effective cancer immunotherapy hinges on the precise recognition of neoantigens, presented as binary complexes with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, by T cell receptors (TCR). The development of immunogenic peptide predictors and generators plays a central role in personalizing immunotherapies while reducing experimental costs. However, the current methods often fall short in leveraging structural data efficiently and providing comprehensive guidance for neoantigen selection. To address these limitations, we introduce NEOM, a novel neoantigen maturation framework encompassing five distinct modules: “policy”, “structure”, “evaluation”, “selection” and “filter”. This framework is designed to enhance precision, interpretability, customizability and cost-effectiveness in neoantigen screening. We evaluated NEOM using a set of random synthetic peptides, followed by available clinically-derived peptides. NEOM achieved higher performance on generated peptide quality compared to other baseline models. Using established predictors for filtering revealed a substantial number of peptides with immunogenic potential. Subsequently, a more rigorous binding affinity evaluation using free energy perturbation methods identified 6 out of 38 candidates showing superior binding characteristics. MHC tetramer peptide exchange assays and flow cytometry experiments further validate five of them. These results demonstrate that NEOM not only excels in identifying diverse peptides with enhanced binding stability and affinity for MHC molecules but also augments their immunogenic potential, showcasing its utility in advancing personalized immunotherapies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.08.14.607669

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 2022, A guide to antigen processing and presentation, Nat. Rev. Immunol, 22, 751, 10.1038/s41577-022-00707-2 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2024, The landscape of neoantigens and its clinical applications: From immunobiology to cancer vaccines, Curr. Res. Biotechnol, 7, 100177, 10.1016/j.crbiot.2024.100177 · DOI
  3. Minati, R. , Perreault, C. & Thibault, P. A Roadmap Toward the Definition of Actionable Tumor-Specific Antigens. Front. Immunol. 11, (2020). · DOI
  4. Zhang, Z. et al. Neoantigen: A New Breakthrough in Tumor Immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 12, (2021). · DOI
  5. 2020, The Origin and Immune Recognition of Tumor-Specific Antigens, Cancers, 12, 2607, 10.3390/cancers12092607 · DOI
  6. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115625 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/ni1516 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/s41571-020-00460-2 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2023, Neoantigens: promising targets for cancer therapy, Signal Transduct. Target. Ther, 8, 9, 10.1038/s41392-022-01270-x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.08.002 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41573-021-00387-y · DOI
  12. Biswas, N. , Chakrabarti, S. , Padul, V. , Jones, L. D. & Ashili, S. Designing neoantigen cancer vaccines, trials, and outcomes. Front. Immunol. 14, (2023). · DOI
  13. 2022, Cancer vaccines as promising immuno-therapeutics: platforms and current progress, J. Hematol. Oncol.J Hematol Oncol, 15, 28, 10.1186/s13045-022-01247-x · DOI
  14. 2020, A large peptidome dataset improves HLA class I epitope prediction across most of the human population, Nat. Biotechnol, 38, 199, 10.1038/s41587-019-0322-9 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/351072a0 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/eji.1830210909 · DOI
  17. 2023, High-throughput, targeted MHC class I immunopeptidomics using a functional genetics screening platform, Nat. Biotechnol, 41, 980, 10.1038/s41587-022-01566-x · DOI
  18. 1994, Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains, J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950, 152, 163
  19. 10.1016/0264-410X(94)00014-E · DOI
  20. 10.1002/eji.1830260836 · DOI
  21. 10.1110/ps.0239403 · DOI
  22. Savoie, C. J. , Kamikawaji, N. , Sasazuki, T. & Kuhara, S. Use of BONSAI decision trees for the identification of potential MHC Class I peptide epitope motifs. in Biocomputing ‘99 182–189 (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 1998). · DOI
  23. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19981201)33:4<460::AID-PROT2>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000796 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s00251-008-0341-z · DOI
  26. 1997, Application of majority voting to pattern recognition: an analysis of its behavior and performance, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. - Part Syst. Hum, 27, 553, 10.1109/3468.618255 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/nar/gks438 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv639 · DOI
  29. 2020, NetMHCpan-4.1 and NetMHCIIpan-4.0: improved predictions of MHC antigen presentation by concurrent motif deconvolution and integration of MS MHC eluted ligand data, Nucleic Acids Res, 48, W449, 10.1093/nar/gkaa379 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 2020, MHCflurry 2.0: Improved Pan-Allele Prediction of MHC Class I-Presented Peptides by Incorporating Antigen Processing, Cell Syst, 11, 42, 10.1016/j.cels.2020.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 2020, Impact of Cysteine Residues on MHC Binding Predictions and Recognition by Tumor-Reactive T Cells, J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950, 205, 539
  32. 10.2174/1568026619666181224101744 · DOI
  33. Marzella, D. F. et al. PANDORA: A Fast, Anchor-Restrained Modelling Protocol for Peptide: MHC Complexes. Front. Immunol. 13, (2022). · DOI
  34. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 2024, Accurate modeling of peptide-MHC structures with AlphaFold, Structure, 32, 228, 10.1016/j.str.2023.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 2023, Peptide-binding specificity prediction using fine-tuned protein structure prediction networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 120, e2216697120, 10.1073/pnas.2216697120 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 2024, Integrating Reinforcement Learning and Monte Carlo Tree Search for enhanced neoantigen vaccine design, Brief. Bioinform, 25, bbae247, 10.1093/bib/bbae247 · DOI
  38. 2022, A transformer-based model to predict peptide–HLA class I binding and optimize mutated peptides for vaccine design, Nat. Mach. Intell, 4, 300, 10.1038/s42256-022-00459-7 · DOI
  39. 2023, Binding peptide generation for MHC Class I proteins with deep reinforcement learning, Bioinformatics, 39, btad055, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad055 · DOI
  40. 2015, A distinct immunogenic region of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 is naturally processed and presented by human islet cells to cytotoxic CD8 T cells, Clin. Exp. Immunol, 179, 100
  41. 10.1074/jbc.M116.741603 · DOI
  42. 10.1172/jci130562 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/protein/gzm033 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/ni942 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/s41467-022-30342-3 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/srep04562 · DOI
  47. 2023, A mutagenesis study of autoantigen optimization for potential T1D vaccine design, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 120, e2214430120, 10.1073/pnas.2214430120 · DOI
  48. Sim, M. J. W. & Sun, P. D. T Cell Recognition of Tumor Neoantigens and Insights Into T Cell Immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 13, (2022). · DOI
  49. 10.1111/imm.12984 · DOI
  50. 2006, Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures, Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc, 15, 2507, 10.1110/ps.062416606 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.009 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.12.014 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, G., Fu, Y., Chan, K. C., Jin, R., Yang, Y., & Zhou, R.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Ruhong
Venue
Scientific Reports
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-08-15
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
4503-4503
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7124744431
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1967217, 2021YFF1200404, ZJZX2020014)
  • Zhejiang University (SN-ZJU-SIAS-003)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFA1306400, 2021YFA1201200, 2024YFA1307500)
  • Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (P22KN00272)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
HLA-peptide binding, personalized cancer immunotherapy, generative design, Markov chain Monte Carlo, free energy perturbation
MeSH terms
Immunoinformatics, Protein Subunit Vaccines, Antigens, Neoplasm, Humans, Markov Chains, Monte Carlo Method, Peptides, Protein Binding, Cancer Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review