PreprintCited by 9Protein Structure and DynamicsReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resolving the conformational ensemble of a membrane protein by integrating small-angle scattering with AlphaFold

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013187 · Paper page

Abstract

The function of a protein is enabled by its conformational landscape. For non-rigid proteins, a complete characterization of this landscape requires understanding the protein’s structure in all functional states, the stability of these states under target conditions, and the transition pathways between them. Several strategies have recently been developed to drive the machine learning algorithm AlphaFold2 (AF) to sample multiple conformations, but it is more challenging to a priori predict what states are stabilized in particular conditions and how the transition occurs. Here, we combine AF sampling with small-angle scattering curves to obtain a weighted conformational ensemble of functional states under target environmental conditions. We apply this to the pentameric ion channel GLIC using small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) curves, and identify apparent closed and open states. Under resting conditions, we find that the best fit to experimental SANS data corresponds to a population of only closed states, while activating conditions allow for a subpopulation of open channels, matching both experiments and extensive simulation sampling using Markov state models. The predicted closed and open states closely resemble crystal structures determined under resting and activating conditions respectively, and project to predicted basins in free energy landscapes calculated from the Markov state models. Further, without using any structural information, the AF sampling also correctly captures intermediate conformations and projects onto the transition pathway resolved in the extensive sampling. This combination of machine learning algorithms and low-dimensional experimental data appears to provide an efficient way to predict not only stable conformations but also accurately sample the transition pathways several orders of magnitude faster than simulation-based sampling. Author summary: The dynamic behavior of proteins is key to their function, including nerve signaling, enzyme catalysis, and cellular regulation. These functions rely on precise movements and shape changes that allow proteins to interact with other molecules. Understanding protein structures and their evolution at the atomic level is thus crucial for many applications such as drug development, but remains a challenging problem. High-resolution experimental techniques can determine the structural states of many proteins, but often struggle to capture less-populated states. While computational approaches can model protein dynamics, they can be expensive and are typically limited to short time scales that may not encompass the full range of biologically relevant behavior. Recently, artificial intelligence-driven tools like AlphaFold2 (AF) have emerged to predict protein structures with high accuracy. However, they usually default to predicting a single structure, and while modified workflows allow for sampling of alternative states, it can be difficult to assess their functional relevance. Here, we introduce a method that combines AlphaFold2 with small-angle scattering data to predict multiple protein states and their frequencies under specific biological conditions. This approach offers a computationally efficient alternative for integrating experimental data with computational methods, providing a new tool for studying protein dynamics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.09.05.611464

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168192 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/s41467-023-44327-3 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/s41589-022-01231-z · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41467-023-36956-5 · DOI
  5. 10.3390/kinasesphosphatases1040018 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41467-024-47370-w · DOI
  7. 10.1038/s41467-023-42086-9 · DOI
  8. 10.1186/s12915-022-01381-5 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/sciadv.adf1378 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.aat4010 · DOI
  11. 10.1042/BST20210499 · DOI
  12. 10.7554/eLife.84147 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2020.129604 · DOI
  14. 2021, Hierarchical dynamics in allostery following ATP hydrolysis monitored by single molecule FRET measurements and MD simulations, Chemical science, 12, 3350, 10.1039/D0SC06134D · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.11.024 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c01281 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/s41598-022-10607-z · DOI
  20. 10.1107/s1600576723005344 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Chinnam NB , Syed A , Hura GL , Hammel M , Tainer JA , Tsutakawa SE . Chapter Twelve - Combining small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) with protein structure predictions to characterize conformations in solution. In: Tainer JA , editor. Small Angle Scattering Part B: Methods for Structural Interpretation. vol. 678 of Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press; 2023. p. 351–376. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0076687922004049. · DOI
  22. 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01189 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/s41467-024-46715-9 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.7554/eLife.68369 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.2108006118 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.06.003 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.03.002 · DOI
  29. 10.1021/ja106173n · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.006 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/nar/gkv309 · DOI
  32. 10.26508/lsa.202101011 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/emboj.2013.17 · DOI
  34. 10.1073/pnas.1617567114 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167128 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81293-1 · DOI
  37. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010483 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad573 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1101/2024.05.28.596195 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/pro.4353 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1101/2024.04.08.587957 · DOI
  42. 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1002/jcc.20291 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/prot.22711 · DOI
  47. 10.1021/j100308a038 · DOI
  48. 10.1063/1.464397 · DOI
  49. 10.1002/jcc.540130805 · DOI
  50. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.3.CO;2-L · DOI
  51. 10.1063/1.449071 · DOI
  52. Chatzimagas L , Hub JS . Chapter Fifteen - Predicting solution scattering patterns with explicit-solvent molecular simulations. In: Tainer JA , editor. Small Angle Scattering Part A: Methods for Structural Investigation. vol. 677 of Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press; 2022. p. 433–456. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0076687922003603. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lidbrink, S. E., Howard, R., Haloi, N., & Lindahl, E.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Science for Life Laboratory (SE)
Corresponding author
Haloi, Nandan
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-09-07
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
e1013187-e1013187
ISSN
1553-734X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411724732
Cited by
9
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Swedish e-Science Research Centre
  • Sven och Lilly Lawskis Fond för Naturvetenskaplig Forskning
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (Berzelius-2023-244)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2019-02433, 2021-05806)
  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (101107036)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
conformational ensembles, membrane protein structure, GLIC, pentameric ion channel, small-angle neutron scattering, AlphaFold2, conformational sampling, channel activation, Markov state models, free energy landscape, transition pathways, intermediate conformation
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Membrane Proteins, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Computational Biology, Neutron Diffraction, Scattering, Small Angle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review