PreprintCited by 27Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

AlphaFold 2, but not AlphaFold 3, predicts confident but unrealistic β-solenoid structures for repeat proteins

Open access
Pratt, Olivia S., Elliott, Luc G., Haon, Margaux, Mesdaghi, Shahram, Price, Rebecca M., Simpkin, Adam J., Rigden, Daniel J.·2024·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.csbj.2025.01.016 · Paper page

Abstract

AlphaFold 2 has revolutionised protein structure prediction but, like any new tool, its performance on specific classes of targets, especially those potentially under- represented in its training data, merits attention. Prompted by a highly confident prediction for a biologically meaningless, scrambled repeat sequence, we assessed AF2 performance on sequences comprised perfect repeats of random sequences of different lengths. AF2 frequently folds such sequences into β-solenoids which, while ascribed high confidence, contain unusual and implausible features such as internally stacked and uncompensated charged residues. A number of sequences confidently predicted as β-solenoids are predicted by other advanced methods as intrinsically disordered. The instability of some predictions is demonstrated by Molecular Dynamics. Importantly, other Deep Learning-based structure prediction tools predict different structures or β-solenoids with much lower confidence suggesting that AF2 alone has an unreasonable tendency to predict confident but unrealistic β-solenoids for perfect repeat sequences. The potential implications for structure prediction of natural (near-)perfect sequence repeat proteins are also explored.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.10.30.621056

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 60 · Cited by 27

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nsb1203-980 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1021/ct900549r · DOI
  4. 2024, Proteins with alternative folds reveal blind spots in AlphaFold-based protein structure prediction, arXiv preprint arXiv, 2410, 14898
  5. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.159 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/nar/gkt1175 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)77022-8 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/nar/gkae385 · DOI
  9. 2011, Anchored clathrate waters bind antifreeze proteins to ice, Biochemistry, 108, 7363
  10. 10.1002/1097-0134(20001101)41:2<224::AID-PROT70>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.7761829 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.08.009 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0065-3233(06)73003-0 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1073/pnas.012608599 · DOI
  17. Krishna, R. , Wang, J. , Ahern, W. , Strumeels, P , Venkatesh, P.,Kalvet, I., Lee, G. R., Morey- Burrows , F. S., Anishchenko , I., Humphreys , I. R., McHugh , R., Vafeados , D., Li , X., Sutherland , G. A., Hitchcock , A., Hunter , C. N., Kang , A., Brackenbrough , E., Bera , A. K., Baek , M., Dimaio , F. & Baker , D. (2024) Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom. Science 384(6693). · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1126/science.2503871 · DOI
  19. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1093/bib/bbt003 · DOI
  21. 10.1101/2024.03.07.583852 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac314 · DOI
  23. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3136 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1038/nbt.2419 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 2014, Introduction to protein crystallization, Acta Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology Communications, 1, 2
  27. 2023, Deep Learning-based structure modelling illuminates structure and function in uncharted regions of β-solenoid fold space, Journal of Structural Biology, 215, 3
  28. 10.1002/jcc.21787 · DOI
  29. 2022, ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all, Nature Methods, 19, 697
  30. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026406 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/NAR/GKAA913 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1101/2024.07.10.602726 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1126/science.1158868 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13363 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.238101 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1007/978-981-32-9449-3_14 · DOI
  38. 10.1101/2024.09.08.611582 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Tan, J. , & Zhang, Y. (2023). Explainablefold: Understanding alphafold prediction with explainable ai. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 2166-2176). · DOI
  40. 10.1021/ja00881a009 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/jcc.20291 · DOI
  42. 10.1101/2024.07.09.602655 · DOI
  43. 10.21105/joss.04200 · DOI
  44. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq066 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1002/prot.21643 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Pratt, O. S., Elliott, L. G., Haon, M., Mesdaghi, S., Price, R. M., Simpkin, A. J., & Rigden, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Rigden, Daniel J.
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-10-30
Volume
27
Pages
467-477
ISSN
2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406714966
Cited by
27
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/T008695/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3, protein structure prediction, sequence repeats, intrinsically disordered proteins, prediction confidence, molecular dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review