PreprintCited by 15Protein Structure and DynamicsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In silico evolution of globular protein folds from random sequences

Open access
Sahakyan, Harutyun, Babajanyan, Sanasar G., Wolf, Yuri I., Koonin, Eugene V.·2024·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Preprint — published as 10.1073/pnas.2509015122 · Paper page

Abstract

The origin and evolution of protein folds are among the most challenging, long-standing problems in biology 1,2 . Although many plausible scenarios of early protein evolution leading to fold nucleation have been proposed 3-8 , realistic simulation of this process was not feasible because of the lack of efficient approaches for protein structure prediction, a situation that changed with the advent of powerful tools for fast and robust protein structure prediction, such as AlphaFold 9,10 and ESMFold 11 . We developed a computational approach for protein fold evolution simulator (PFES) with atomistic details that provide insights into the mechanisms of evolution of globular folds from random amino acid sequences. PFES introduces random mutations in a population of protein sequences, evaluates the effect of mutations on protein structure, and selects a new set of proteins for further evolution. Repeating this process iteratively allows tracking the evolutionary trajectory of a changing protein fold that evolves under selective pressure for protein fold stability, interaction with other proteins, or other features shaping the fitness landscape. We employed PFES to show how globular protein folds could evolve from random amino acid sequences as monomers or in complexes with other proteins. The simulations reproduce the evolution of many simple folds of natural proteins as well as the evolution of distinct folds not known to exist in nature. We show that evolution of a stable fold from random sequences, on average takes 3 to 8 amino acid replacements per site, suggesting that simple but stable protein folds can evolve relatively easily. These findings could shed light on the enigma of the rapid evolution of protein fold diversity at the earliest stages of life evolution. PFES tracks the complete evolutionary history from simulations that describes intermediate states at the sequence and structure levels and can be used to test versatile hypotheses on protein fold evolution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.11.10.622830

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1038/385579a0 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.0905029106 · DOI
  3. 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4335 · DOI
  4. 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4393 · DOI
  5. 10.7554/eLife.09410 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.1707642114 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/molbev/msab017 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/pro.4362 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Finkelstein, A. V. & Ptitsyn, O. B. Protein Physics: A Course of Lectures (Academic Press, 2002). · DOI
  12. 10.1038/357543a0 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nature01256 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.95.9.4976 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/pro.5560040401 · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.0910445107 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/bies.10321 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1186/1745-6150-2-14 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1073/pnas.1620179114 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1126/science.adl2528 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093/protein/9.1.27 · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.1017570108 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/nrg2662 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Gavrilets, S. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. (Princeton University Press, 2004). · DOI
  26. 10.1093/molbev/msab240 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.str.2010.11.017 · DOI
  29. Ohno, S. Evolution by gene duplication. (Springer-Verlag, 1970). · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1093/gbe/evt021 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/molbev/msy054 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/gbe/evp016 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/nar/gky161 · DOI
  35. 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-120107 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.chom.2020.12.007 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.chom.2020.04.001 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/febs.15037 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2023.02.065 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.167991 · DOI
  41. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010262 · DOI
  42. 10.1534/genetics.118.300699 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/s41589-022-00967-y · DOI
  44. 10.1038/nature03306 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1038/s41467-023-42924-w · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1002/prot.10064 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/S0959-440X(02)00334-2 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1007/s12551-022-01000-1 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/protein/gzab002 · DOI
  50. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01343 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/s41467-024-51669-z · DOI
  52. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1021/ct400314y · DOI
  55. 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01106 · DOI
  56. 10.1002/jcc.25382 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Sahakyan, H., Babajanyan, S. G., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Sahakyan, Harutyun
  • Koonin, Eugene V.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-11-10
Volume
122
Issue
27
Pages
e2509015122-e2509015122
ISSN
0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411789582
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
protein fold evolution, globular proteins, in silico evolution, protein stability, protein-protein interaction, fitness landscape, evolutionary trajectories, last universal common ancestor, protein folding
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Computer Simulation, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Proteins, Protein Folding, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review