Cited by 515RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

The evolutionary consequences of erroneous protein synthesis

Open access
Allan Drummond, D., Wilke, Claus O.·2009·Nature Reviews Genetics

Abstract

Errors in protein synthesis disrupt cellular fitness, cause disease phenotypes and shape gene and genome evolution. Experimental and theoretical results on this topic have accumulated rapidly in disparate fields, such as neurobiology, protein biosynthesis and degradation and molecular evolution, but with limited communication among disciplines. Here, we review studies of error frequencies, the cellular and organismal consequences of errors and the attendant long-range evolutionary responses to errors. We emphasize major areas in which little is known, such as the failure rates of protein folding, in addition to areas in which technological innovations may enable imminent gains, such as the elucidation of translational missense error frequencies. Evolutionary responses to errors fall into two broad categories: adaptations that minimize errors and their attendant costs and adaptations that exploit errors for the organism's benefit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg2662

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allan Drummond, D., & Wilke, C. O.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Wilke, Claus O.
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2009-10
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
715-724
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W2034108516
Cited by
515
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 28
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P50GM068763, R01GM088344)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Keywords
protein synthesis errors, translational errors, error rate, protein degradation, molecular evolution, genome evolution, cell fitness, disease phenotypes, error tolerance
MeSH terms
Animals, Genetic Code, Humans, Transcription, Genetic, Protein Biosynthesis, Protein Folding, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review