The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DeepAssembly2: A Web Server for Protein Complex Structure Assembly Based on Domain-Domain Interactions
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169128 · Paper page
Abstract
Proteins often perform biological functions by forming complexes, thereby accurately predicting the structure of protein complexes is crucial to understanding and mastering their functions, as well as facilitating drug discovery. Protein monomeric structure prediction has made a breakthrough in recent years, but the accurate prediction of complex structure remains a challenge. In this work, we present DeepAssembly2, a web server for automatically assembling protein complex structure based on domain-domain interactions. First, the features are constructed according to the input complex sequence and monomeric structures, then these features are used to predict the inter-chain residue distance through a deep learning model, and finally, the complex structure is assembled under the guidance of inter-chain residue distances. Compared with the previously developed version, DeepAssembly2 is trained on a newly constructed inter-chain domain-domain interaction dataset. Meanwhile, several important features have been added, such as Interface Residue Propensity and Ultrafast Shape Recognition. In addition, we introduced the inter-chain residue distance from the AlphaFold-Multimer model to further improve the accuracy. Finally, we also integrate our recently developed model quality assessment method to select the output models. The performance of DeepAssembly2 is significantly improved compared with the previous version, providing a solution for large protein complex structure modeling through divide-and-conquer assembly strategy, and is expected to provide new insights and an effective tool for drug development, vaccine design, etc. The web server of DeepAssembly2 is freely available at http://zhanglab-bioinf.com/DeepAssembly/ .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s42256-021-00348-5 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.26609 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01324 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00445 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41596-020-0312-x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1092645 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1529/biophysj.107.114280 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.str.2011.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.adl2528 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac553 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1905068116 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01387 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42003-023-05610-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12539-023-00597-5 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkp318 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.25823 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.26237 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.12.1091 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkw1081 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-023-37701-8 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac056 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad591 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbac507 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s42256-023-00741-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbad420 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Xia, Y., Pu, Y., Wang, S., Zhuang, J., Liu, D., Hou, M., & Zhang, G.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Guijun
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-11-25
- Volume
- 437
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 169128-169128
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4409201509
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (LZ20F030002, 2025C01190, 62173304)
- National Science and Technology Major Project (2022ZD0115103)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022ZD0115103)
- Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LZ20F030002)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- protein complex structure prediction, protein complex formation, domain-domain interactions, web server, shape recognition, AlphaFold-Multimer, model quality assessment, drug discovery
- MeSH terms
- Protein Domains, Deep Learning, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Computational Biology, Internet, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review