PreprintCited by 13Antimicrobial Peptides and ActivitiesMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unveiling the Evolution of Antimicrobial Peptides in Gut Microbes via Foundation Model-Powered Framework

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115773 · Paper page

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance poses a growing threat to public health, emphasizing the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), short peptide sequences with diverse mechanisms of action, offer a promising alternative due to their broad-spectrum activity against pathogens. Recent advances in protein language models (PLMs) have revolutionized protein structure prediction and functional annotation, highlighting their potential for AMP discovery and therapeutic development. In this context, we present AMP-SEMiner (Antimicrobial Peptide Structural Evolution Miner), an AI-driven framework designed to identify AMPs from metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). By integrating PLMs, structural clustering and evolutionary analysis into the framework, AMP-SEMiner can identify AMPs encoded by small open reading frames (smORFs) and encrypted peptides (EPs), significantly expanding the discovery space. Using this approach, we identified 1,670,600 AMP candidates from diverse habitats. Experimental validation of 29 candidates revealed antimicrobial activity in 18, with 13 surpassing antibiotics in effectiveness. Further analysis of AMPs from human gut microbiomes demonstrated both conserved and adaptive evolutionary strategies, ensuring their functional efficacy in the dynamic gut environment. These findings position AMP-SEMiner as a powerful tool for the discovery and characterization of novel AMPs, with significant potential to drive the development of new antimicrobial therapies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.01.13.632881

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 88

  1. 2022, Antibiotic resistance: The challenges and some emerging strategies for tackling a global menace, 36, e24655
  2. 10.1186/s12918-017-0396-2 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nrmicro2937 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1093/femsre/fuv008 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/cmdc.201402215 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.micres.2013.03.001 · DOI
  7. 10.1039/D0NP00019A · DOI
  8. 2022, Mining for encrypted peptide antibiotics in the human proteome, Nat Biomed Eng, 6, 67
  9. 10.1002/cbic.200800438 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/ja.2013.138 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41522-017-0042-1 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/s41467-023-43352-6 · DOI
  13. Chen, S. et al. The discovery of antimicrobial peptides from the gut microbiome of cockroach Blattella germanica using deep learning pipeline. bioRxiv, 2024.2002.2012.580024 (2024).x1 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41564-023-01524-6 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.cell.2024.07.027 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s41586-018-0207-y · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.chom.2023.07.001 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/emmm.201201773 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/s41522-024-00560-2 · DOI
  20. 10.7717/peerj.10555 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/s41587-022-01226-0 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/pro.4529 · DOI
  23. 10.7717/peerj.17729 · DOI
  24. Hao, Y. , Liu, X. , Fu, H. , Shao, X. & Cai, W . PGAT-ABPp: harnessing protein language models and graph attention networks for antibacterial peptide identification with remarkable accuracy. Bioinformatics 40 (2024). · DOI
  25. 10.1159/000490183 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3095381 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Li, W. et al. Discovering CRISPR-Cas system with self-processing pre-crRNA capability by foundation models. bioRxiv, 2024.2003.2011.583506 (2024). · DOI
  29. 10.1126/sci-ence.adf2465 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1093/nar/gkv1278 · DOI
  32. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-431 · DOI
  33. Witten, J. & Witten, Z . Deep learning regression model for antimicrobial peptide design. BioRxiv, 692681 (2019). · DOI
  34. 10.1093/nar/gkab1080 · DOI
  35. Ye, G. et al. LAMP2: a major update of the database linking antimicrobial peptides. Database (Oxford) 2020 (2020). · DOI
  36. Burdukiewicz, M. et al. Proteomic Screening for Prediction and Design of Antimicrobial Peptides with AmpGram. Int J Mol Sci 21 (2020). · DOI
  37. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa653 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa917 · DOI
  39. 2022, AMPlify: attentive deep learning model for discovery of novel antimicrobial peptides effective against WHO priority pathogens, BMC Genomics, 23, 77, 10.1186/s12864-022-08310-4 · DOI
  40. 10.1186/s13104-023-06279-1 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/bib/bbad240 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/bfgp/elae046 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/J.CELL.2024.05.013 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.11.013 · DOI
  45. 10.1110/ps.035436.108 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/s41587 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/NAR/GKAD344 · DOI
  48. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00156 · DOI
  49. 10.1126/science.1058709 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Gallardo-Becerra, L. , Cervantes-Echeverría, M. , Cornejo-Granados, F. , Vazquez-Morado, L.E. & Ochoa-Leyva, A . Perspectives in Searching Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs) Produced by the Microbiota. Microbial Ecology 87, 8 (2023). · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.09.018 · DOI
  52. 10.1126/science.adg5725 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.4 · DOI
  54. 10.1099/ijs.0.008169-0 · DOI
  55. 10.1126/science.1208344 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1093/nar/gku989 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1093/nar/gkl164 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Hu, E.J. , et al. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv :2106.09685 (2021). · arXiv
  60. 10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100559 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.046 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.gpb.2021.05.001 · DOI
  63. 10.1038/s41586-021-03532-0 · DOI
  64. 10.1038/s41587-022-01367-2 · DOI
  65. 10.1093/nar/gkac1080 · DOI
  66. 10.1186/s13104-016-1900-2 · DOI
  67. 2011, Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads, EMBnet. journal, 17, 10, 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033 · DOI
  69. 10.1038/nmeth.1923 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.7717/peerj.7359 · DOI
  72. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848 · DOI
  73. 10.21105/joss.04296 · DOI
  74. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1101/2021.06.03.446934 · DOI
  76. 10.1038/s41588-024-01737-3 · DOI
  77. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1038/s41592-022-01585-1 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Tang, Q.Y. , Ren, W. , Wang, J. & Kaneko, K . The Statistical Trends of Protein Evolution: A Lesson from AlphaFold Database. Mol Biol Evol 39 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1093/molbev/msu300 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB301 · DOI
  84. 10.1038/nprot.2007.521 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1002/jcc.20945 · DOI · Paper page
  86. 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01153 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5 · DOI
  88. 10.1039/C9CP04096J · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Li, W., Huang, B., Guo, M., Zeng, Z., Cai, T., Feng, L., Zhang, X., Guo, L., Jiang, X., Yin, Y., Wang, E., Huang, X., & Zheng, J.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Zhejiang Lab (CN)
  • Research Center for Life Sciences Computing, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou 311121, Zhejiang, China
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • ShanghaiTech University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Ercheng
  • Huang, Xingxu
  • Zheng, Jinfang
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-01-13
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
115773-115773
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410801392
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (82450113, 2024SSYS0007)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Keywords
antimicrobial peptides, protein language models, metagenome-assembled genomes, small open reading frames, gut microbiota, antimicrobial resistance, structural clustering, alternative antimicrobial therapy
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Antimicrobial Peptides, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Humans, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review