The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning guided design of protease substrates
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-025-67226-1 · Paper page
Abstract
Proteases, a class of enzymes that play critical roles in health and disease, exert their function through the cleavage of peptide bonds. Identifying substrates that are efficiently and selectively cleaved by target proteases is essential for studying protease activity and for harnessing their activity in protease-activated diagnostics and therapeutics. However, the vast design space of possible substrates (c.a. 20 10 unique amino acid combinations for a 10-mer peptide) and the limited accessibility of high-throughput activity profiling tools hinder the speed and success of substrate design. We present CleaveNet, an end-to-end AI pipeline for the design of protease substrates. Applied to matrix metalloproteinases, CleaveNet enhances the scale, tunability, and efficiency of substrate design. CleaveNet generates peptide substrates that exhibit sound biophysical properties and capture not only well-established but also novel cleavage motifs. To enable precise control over substrate design, CleaveNet incorporates a conditioning tag that enables generation of peptides guided by a target cleavage profile, enabling targeted design of efficient and selective substrates. CleaveNet-generated substrates were validated experimentally through a large-scale in vitro screen, even in the challenging case of designing highly selective substrates for MMP13. We envision that CleaveNet will accelerate our ability to study and capitalize on protease activity, paving the way for new in silico design tools across enzyme classes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- 10.1074/jbc.R800035200 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms21249739 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-030617-050549 · DOI
- 10.1038/nchembio707 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.2182 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6629 · DOI
- 10.1042/bj20021643 · DOI
- 10.1111/febs.15227 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molmed.2020.01.013 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.1075 · DOI
- 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw0262 · DOI
- 10.1080/14712598.2020.1699053 · DOI
- 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-933 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsnano.2c04162 · DOI
- 15. Q. Zhong , et al., bioRxiv (2024). Conditional fusogenic lipid nanocarriers for cytosolic delivery of macromolecular therapeutics. · DOI
- 10.1385/MB:22:1:051 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M513331200 · DOI
- 10.1021/bc9002019 · DOI
- 10.1111/febs.14001 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrd2092 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.08.015 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-16838-w · DOI
- 10.1038/cdd.2014.64 · DOI
- 10.1515/hsz-2019-0332 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2009279117 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0037441 · DOI
- E. L. Schneider , C. S. Craik , Proteases and Cancer: Methods and Protocols pp. 59–78 (2009). Positional scanning synthetic combinatorial libraries for substrate profiling. · DOI
- 10.1142/S021972000500117X · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-13-1 · DOI
- 31. T. Lohmüller, et al. (2003). Toward computer-based cleavage site prediction of cysteine endopeptidases. · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz721 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx670 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq043 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.GPB.2019.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012061 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-023-05696-3 · DOI
- S. Alamdari , et al., bioRxiv (2024). Protein generation with evolutionary diffusion: sequence is all you need. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nsr/nwad331 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fonc.2019.01370 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.07.008 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms22041742 · DOI
- 10.2353/ajpath.2009.081080 · DOI
- 1997, Schmidhuber, Neural Computation, Long short-term memory, 9, 1735
- A. Vaswani , et al., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (2017). Attention is all you need.
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41587-022-01618-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acsomega.2c01559 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth1109-786 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dib.2016.02.036 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1406134111 · DOI
- 10.1021/pr0340476 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/bc800117r · DOI
- 10.7150/thno.13826 · DOI
- 2020, Nature Communications, Protease circuits for processing biological information, 11, 5021
- A. Sivakumar , et al., Nature Nanotechnology pp. 1–10 (2025). AND-gated proteaseactivated nanosensors for programmable detection of anti-tumour immunity.
- B. Lakshminarayanan , A. Pritzel , C. Blundell , Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (2017). Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles.
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin-Alonso, C., Alamdari, S., Samad, T. S., Yang, K. K., Bhatia, S. N., & Amini, A. P.
- Affiliations
- Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (US)
- Microsoft Research New England (United States) (US)
- Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research At MIT (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bhatia, Sangeeta N.
- Amini, Ava P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-03-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-54
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12775482
- OpenAlex
- W7119034859
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 37.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research
- “la Caixa” Foundation (100010434)
- Broad Institute
- Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Ludwig Center at Harvard
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- matrix metalloproteinases, MMP-13, peptide production, deep learning
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Humans, Peptide Hydrolases, Peptides, Substrate Specificity, Matrix Metalloproteinase 13, Proteolysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review