PreprintCited by 26Machine Learning in BioinformaticsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning the language of protein-protein interactions

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-025-67971-3

Abstract

Protein Language Models (PLMs) trained on large databases of protein sequences have proven effective in modeling protein biology across a wide range of applications. However, while PLMs excel at capturing individual protein properties, they face challenges in natively representing protein–protein interactions (PPIs), which are crucial to understanding cellular processes and disease mechanisms. Here, we introduce MINT, a PLM specifically designed to model sets of interacting proteins in a contextual and scalable manner. Using unsupervised training on a large curated PPI dataset derived from the STRING database, MINT outperforms existing PLMs in diverse tasks relating to protein-protein interactions, including binding affinity prediction and estimation of mutational effects. Beyond these core capabilities, it excels at modeling interactions in complex protein assemblies and surpasses specialized models in antibody-antigen modeling and T cell receptor–epitope binding prediction. MINT’s predictions of mutational impacts on oncogenic PPIs align with experimental studies, and it provides reliable estimates for the potential for cross-neutralization of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. These findings position MINT as a powerful tool for elucidating complex protein interactions, with significant implications for biomedical research and therapeutic discovery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.03.09.642188

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. 2019, Learning protein sequence embeddings using information from structure, arXiv preprint
  2. 10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.017 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2021, Language models enable zero-shot prediction of the effects of mutations on protein function, Advances in neural information processing systems, 34, 29287
  5. 10.1038/s41586-023-06617-0 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.abd7331 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Wu, R. et al. High-resolution de novo structure prediction from primary sequence. BioRxiv 2022–07 (2022).
  8. 10.1073/pnas.2220778120 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.cels.2021.08.010 · DOI
  11. 2022, Peer: a comprehensive and multi-task benchmark for protein sequence understanding, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 35156
  12. 10.1038/s41598-022-13227-9 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad663 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac258 · DOI
  15. 10.1073/pnas.2405840121 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2024, Large scale paired antibody language models, arXiv preprint
  17. Singh, R. et al. Learning the language of antibody hypervariability. bioRxiv 2023–04 (2023). · DOI
  18. 10.1093/NAR/GKAC1000 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Vaswani, A. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2017).
  20. 10.1093/bib/bbae076 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty635 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Chungyoun, M. , Ruffolo, J. A. & Gray, J. J. Flab: Benchmarking deep learning methods for antibody fitness prediction. bioRxiv 2024–01 (2024). · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.2418918121 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac820 · DOI
  25. 2018, Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding, arXiv preprint
  26. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00491 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Omelchenko, A. A. et al. Sliding window interaction grammar (swing): a generalized interaction language model for peptide and protein interactions. bioRxiv (2024). · DOI
  28. Rao, R. M. et al. Msa transformer. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 8844–8856 (PMLR, 2021).
  29. 2020, Progen: Language modeling for protein generation, arXiv preprint
  30. 2021, Prottrans: towards cracking the language of life’s code through self-supervised learning, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 44, 7112
  31. Su, J. et al. Saprot: Protein language modeling with structure-aware vocabulary. bioRxiv (2023). · DOI
  32. Greenfield, E. A. Antibodies. A laboratory manual, second edition Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.[Google Scholar] (2014).
  33. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008187 · DOI
  34. Shanehsazzadeh, A. et al. Unlocking de novo antibody design with generative artificial intelligence. bioRxiv 2023–01 (2023).
  35. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007207 · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.1613231114 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Desautels, T. , Zemla, A. , Lau, E. , Franco, M. & Faissol, D. Rapid in silico design of antibodies targeting sars-cov-2 using machine learning and supercomputing. BioRxiv 2020–04 (2020). · DOI
  38. 10.1073/pnas.0701000104 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz184 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/B978-0-12-394292-0.00006-0 · DOI
  41. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b11367 · DOI
  42. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-082119-124838 · DOI
  43. Velez-Arce, A. et al. Tdc-2: Multimodal foundation for therapeutic science. bioRxiv 2024–06 (2024).
  44. 10.1038/s42256-023-00634-4 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/nar/gky1006 · DOI
  46. 10.1093/nar/gkx760 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx286 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad475 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/s42003-021-02610-3 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/s42256-023-00619-3 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1093/bib/bbad086 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab294 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/s42256-021-00383-2 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1093/nar/gkx971 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/s41588-020-00774-y · DOI
  56. 10.1038/s41586-021-04043-8 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1126/science.adg7492 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.013 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1038/s41467-019-11959-3 · DOI
  60. 10.1038/s41598-017-01913-y · DOI
  61. 10.1038/s41392-021-00710-4 · DOI
  62. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa739 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1038/s41467-023-37926-7 · DOI
  64. 10.1038/s41586-021-04060-7 · DOI
  65. Hayes, T. et al. Simulating 500 million years of evolution with a language model. Science eads0018 (2025). · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Jin, W. , Sarkizova, S. , Chen, X. , Hacohen, N. & Uhler, C. Unsupervised protein-ligand binding energy prediction via neural euler’s rotation equation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2024).

Metadata

Authors
Ullanat, V., Jing, B., Sledzieski, S., & Berger, B.
Affiliations
  • MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
  • Flatiron Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Berger, Bonnie
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-03-10
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
1199-1199
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7118534871
Cited by
26
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 4
FWCI
45.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2141064)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0022158)
  • National Institutes of Health (2141064)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM141861)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, protein language models, Mentha, binding affinity prediction, mutation effects, protein assembly, SARS-CoV-2 variants, unsupervised learning, STRING database

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review