PreprintCited by 8Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-throughput peptide-centric local stability assay extends protein-ligand identification to membrane proteins, tissues, and bacteria

Open access
Li, Kejia, Potel, Clement M, Becher, Isabelle, Hüttmann, Nico, Garrido-Rodriguez, Martin, Schwarz, Jennifer, Savitski, Mikhail M·2025·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41594-025-01699-y

Abstract

Systematic mapping of protein-ligand interactions is essential for understanding biological processes and drug mechanisms. Peptide-centric local stability assay (PELSA) is a powerful tool for detecting these interactions and localizing potential binding sites. However, its original workflow is limited in throughput, sample compatibility and accessible protein targets. Here, we introduce a high-throughput adaptation - HT-PELSA - that increases sample processing efficiency 100-fold while maintaining high sensitivity and reproducibility. HT-PELSA substantially extends the capabilities of the original method by enabling sensitive protein-ligand profiling in crude cell, tissue and bacterial lysates, making it possible to identify membrane protein targets in diverse biological systems. We demonstrate that HT-PELSA can precisely and accurately determine binding affinities of small molecule inhibitors, sensitively detect direct and allosteric ATP binding, and reveal off-target interactions of a marketed kinase inhibitor in heart tissue. By enhancing scalability, reducing costs, and enabling system-wide drug screening across a wide range of sample types, HT-PELSA - when combined with next-generation mass spectrometry - offers a powerful platform poised to accelerate both drug discovery and basic biological research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.04.28.650974

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1038/s41573-022-00409-3 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.0910040106 · DOI
  3. Savitski, M. M. et al. Tracking cancer drugs in living cells by thermal profiling of the proteome. Science 346, 1255784 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nbt.2999 · DOI
  5. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00500 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/s41592-024-02553-7 · DOI
  7. 10.18388/abp.2004_3573 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/s41587-023-02099-7 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/acschembio.5b01063 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nbt1328 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/ac301553x · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.006 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06433.x · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41467-020-15611-3 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)69430-X · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.aan4368 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.15252/msb.20188242 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/s41467-024-53240-2 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61865-0 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2008.00090.x · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2018.10.010 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605366 · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.0813013106 · DOI
  24. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.161687 · DOI
  25. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062885 · DOI
  26. 10.1074/jbc.M807414200 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/s41592-019-0638-x · DOI
  28. Wu, T. et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. The Innovation 2, 100141 (2021). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Li, K., Potel, C. M., Becher, I., Hüttmann, N., Garrido-Rodriguez, M., Schwarz, J., & Savitski, M. M.
Affiliations
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • Molecular Systems Biology unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany
Corresponding author
Savitski, Mikhail M
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-04-29
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
184-192
ISSN
1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415913330
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
protein-ligand interactions, high-throughput screening, membrane proteins, bacterial extracts, tissue lysates, small molecule inhibitors, binding affinity, drug screening, mass spectrometry
MeSH terms
Animals, Binding Sites, Humans, Ligands, Membrane Proteins, Peptides, Protein Binding, Reproducibility of Results, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Drug Discovery, High-Throughput Screening Assays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review