PreprintCited by 2Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ECOD: Classification of domains in AFDB Swiss-Prot structure predictions

Open access
Schaeffer, RD, Zhang, J, Cong, Q, Grishin, NV·2025·PLoS Computational Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013431 · Paper page

Abstract

The development of highly accurate protein structure prediction algorithms has led to an explosion of structural data, transforming our understanding of protein structure-function relationships across diverse organisms. Domain classifications such as the Evolutionary Classificatioxn of Protein Domains (ECOD) have incorporated these computational predictions alongside experimental structures to create comprehensive resources for the research community. The AlphaFold Database (AFDB) plays a unique role, providing millions of predicted structures that ECOD has systematically classified for human proteins, small pathogens, and reference proteomes. Here, we extend this classification framework to the Swiss-Prot/UniProtKB dataset, applying the Domain Parser for AlphaFold Models (DPAM) pipeline to classify domains from over 542,000 Swiss-Prot protein structure predictions, resulting in more than 1,032,000 classified domains. These domains span 3,493 ECOD topologies and display high assignment confidence (mean DPAM probability: 0.992), with extensive taxonomic and functional diversity. Notably, over 100,000 domains lack existing Pfam mappings, indicating novel evolutionary groups. These results significantly expand ECOD’s coverage into a functionally and taxonomically diverse protein space, anchoring high-confidence structure predictions in an evolutionary framework. By integrating Swiss-Prot predictions, we enhance the utility and interpretability of AlphaFold models and establish a foundation for future large-scale, functionally informed domain classifications. Author Summary: Large-scale protein structure prediction using deep learning has revolutionized our ability to study protein families and infer biological function. However, connecting these predicted structures to well-understood evolutionary classifications remains challenging. In this work, we apply a domain parsing pipeline to classify over half a million AlphaFold-predicted Swiss-Prot proteins into evolutionary groups using ECOD, a structure-based domain classification system. This enables the systematic integration of structural predictions with functional annotation across a broad range of species. Our analysis reveals taxonomic and functional diversity, highlights domain clusters with no prior annotation, and expands ECOD coverage with high-confidence, evolutionarily meaningful predictions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.08.14.670261

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1042/BJ20090122 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts682 · DOI
  3. 10.7554/eLife.71220 · DOI
  4. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007569 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/nar/gkae997 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/nar/gkac1096 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/nar/gky1130 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/nar/gkz1064 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/nar/gkae1087 · DOI
  10. Schaeffer RD , Medvedev KE , Andreeva A , Chuguransky SR , Pinto BL , Zhang J , et al. ECOD: integrating classifications of protein domains from experimental and predicted structures. Nucleic Acids Res [Internet]. 2024; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39565196 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1038/S41586-024-07487-W · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1073/pnas.2214069120 · DOI
  16. 2023, Insights into virulence: structure classification of the Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD mobilome, mSystems, 8, e0079623, 10.1128/msystems.00796-23 · DOI
  17. 2024, Structure classification of the proteins from Salmonella enterica pangenome revealed novel potential pathogenicity islands, Sci Rep, 14, 12260, 10.1038/s41598-024-60991-x · DOI
  18. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011586 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1126/science.adq4946 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1093/nar/gkae1010 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1093/nar/gkx1069 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/nar/gks1067 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/nar/gku1221 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/nar/28.1.304 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/75556 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/genetics/iyad031 · DOI
  27. Zhang J , Schaeffer RD , Durham J , Cong Q , Grishin NV. DPAM: Domain Parser for AlphaFold Models [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://github.com/CongLabCode/DPAM · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1093/nar/gkq1105 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.1.77 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.3.282 · DOI
  33. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Schaeffer, R., Zhang, J., Cong, Q., & Grishin, N.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-08-17
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
e1013431-e1013431
ISSN
1553-734X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7143516912
Cited by
2
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (MED240004, BIO250039, MCB23014, MCB24018, 2224128)
  • Welch Foundation (I‐1505, I-2095-20220331)
  • Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1K99AI180984-01A1)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM147367, R01GM147367)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1K99AI180984-01A1, 1K99AI180984)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein domain classification, ECOD, Swiss-Prot, AlphaFold structure prediction, protein structure-function relationship, Pfam, protein evolution
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Prediction Algorithms, Algorithms, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review