The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A predicted structural interactome reveals binding interference from intrinsically disordered regions
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013899 · Paper page
Abstract
Proteins function through dynamic interactions with other proteins in cells, forming complex networks fundamental to cellular processes. While high-resolution and high-throughput methods have significantly advanced our understanding of how proteins interact with each other, the molecular details of many important protein-protein interactions are still poorly characterized, especially in non-mammalian species, including Drosophila . Recent advancements in deep learning techniques have enabled the prediction of molecular details in various cellular pathways at the network level. In this study, we used AlphaFold2 multimer to examine and predict protein-protein interactions from both physical and functional datasets in Drosophila . We found that functional associations contribute significantly to high-confidence predictions. Through detailed structural analysis, we also found the importance of intrinsically disordered regions in the predicted high-confidence interactions. Our study highlights the importance of disordered regions in protein-protein interactions and demonstrates the importance of incorporating functional interactions in predicting physical interactions between proteins. We further compiled an interactive web interface to present the predictions, facilitating functional exploration, comparative analysis, and the generation of mechanistic hypotheses for future studies. Author Summary: Understanding which proteins interact with each other and how they interact is essential for uncovering fundamental biology and for identifying new pathways involved in health and disease. However, identifying protein-protein interactions experimentally is often challenging and error-prone, and many organisms still lack comprehensive interaction maps. In this study, we use AlphaFold2-multimer, a powerful artificial intelligence tool, to generate high-confidence predictions of PPIs in Drosophila melanogaster , a widely used model organism. We highlight the importance of incorporating often neglected functional associations when predicting protein-protein interactions at a genomic scale. The predictions enable us to examine how intrinsically disordered regions can mediate binding across large interaction networks, revealing widespread, structurally plausible interactions in vivo . Overall, our work demonstrates how AlphaFold predictions can greatly expand our understanding of the structural forces that shape protein interaction networks and help reveal hidden layers of cellular complexes and pathways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00548 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/cdg359 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2010.08.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.029 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.038 · DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2014.164 · DOI
- 10.1038/340245a0 · DOI
- 10.1002/pmic.200400856 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.201112098 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.4201 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2164-9-461 · DOI
- 10.1186/1479-7364-3-3-291 · DOI
- 2008, Improving yeast two-hybrid screening systems, Brief. Funct. Genomic. Proteomic, 6, 302, 10.1093/bfgp/elm035 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa1074 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bpc.2022.106769 · DOI
- Mollica, L. , Bessa, L.M. , Hanoulle, X. , Jensen, M.R. , Blackledge, M. and Schneider, R . (2016) Binding Mechanisms of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Theory, Simulation, and Experiment. Front. Mol. Biosci., 3. · DOI
- 10.1002/jmr.961 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2406407121 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102958 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsob.210222 · DOI
- 10.2174/1381612811319230005 · DOI
- 10.1021/cr400525m · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2304302120 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41594-022-00910-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-023-41721-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/S44320-023-00005-6/SUPPL_FILE/44320_2023_5_MOESM15_ESM.ZIP · DOI
- 2024, The Origin and Evolution of Sex Peptide and Sex Peptide Receptor Interactions, Mol. Biol. Evol, 41, msae065, 10.1093/molbev/msae065 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nmeth.1931 · DOI
- 10.1002/PRO.3978 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/29.17.3513 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1087361 · DOI
- 10.1038/msb.2008.19 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1137/040608635 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.047 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abm9129 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.01411-12 · DOI
- 2016, Identification of Novel Regulators of the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway that Control Border Cell Migration in the Drosophila Ovary, G3 GenesGenomesGenetics, 6, 1991, 10.1534/g3.116.028100 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.4466 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Exploring protein-protein interactions at the proteome level, Structure, 30, 462, 10.1016/j.str.2022.02.004 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2024.02.19.580970 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.CELL.2024.01.022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.088 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.10.003 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001962 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103002 · DOI
- 2024, Benchmarking of AlphaFold2 accuracy self-estimates as indicators of empirical model quality and ranking: a comparison with independent model quality assessment programmes, Bioinformatics, 40, btae491, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae491 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2025.01.034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2025.10.10.681672 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-023-07004-5 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-023-02159-5 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkad928 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.10532 · DOI
- 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
- 2007, Achieving 80% ten[fold cross[validated accuracy for secondary structure prediction by large[scale training, Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinforma, 66, 838, 10.1002/prot.21298 · DOI
- Hagberg, A.A. , Schult, D.A. and Swart, P.J. (2008) Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX. In Varoquaux, G. , Vaught, T. , Millman, J. (eds), Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference. Pasadena, CA USA, pp. 11–15. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/gr.1239303 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.4.380 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-025-02593-7 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky949 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01585-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, J., & Zhao, L.
- Affiliations
- Rockefeller University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Li
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-08-20
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e1013899-e1013899
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12854418
- OpenAlex
- W7125478495
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5
- FWCI
- 10.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM133780)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction, intrinsically disordered regions, AlphaFold2-Multimer, Drosophila
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review