PreprintCited by 5Protein Structure and DynamicsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A predicted structural interactome reveals binding interference from intrinsically disordered regions

Open access
Peng, Junhui, Zhao, Li·2025·PLoS Computational Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013899 · Paper page

Abstract

Proteins function through dynamic interactions with other proteins in cells, forming complex networks fundamental to cellular processes. While high-resolution and high-throughput methods have significantly advanced our understanding of how proteins interact with each other, the molecular details of many important protein-protein interactions are still poorly characterized, especially in non-mammalian species, including Drosophila . Recent advancements in deep learning techniques have enabled the prediction of molecular details in various cellular pathways at the network level. In this study, we used AlphaFold2 multimer to examine and predict protein-protein interactions from both physical and functional datasets in Drosophila . We found that functional associations contribute significantly to high-confidence predictions. Through detailed structural analysis, we also found the importance of intrinsically disordered regions in the predicted high-confidence interactions. Our study highlights the importance of disordered regions in protein-protein interactions and demonstrates the importance of incorporating functional interactions in predicting physical interactions between proteins. We further compiled an interactive web interface to present the predictions, facilitating functional exploration, comparative analysis, and the generation of mechanistic hypotheses for future studies. Author Summary: Understanding which proteins interact with each other and how they interact is essential for uncovering fundamental biology and for identifying new pathways involved in health and disease. However, identifying protein-protein interactions experimentally is often challenging and error-prone, and many organisms still lack comprehensive interaction maps. In this study, we use AlphaFold2-multimer, a powerful artificial intelligence tool, to generate high-confidence predictions of PPIs in Drosophila melanogaster , a widely used model organism. We highlight the importance of incorporating often neglected functional associations when predicting protein-protein interactions at a genomic scale. The predictions enable us to examine how intrinsically disordered regions can mediate binding across large interaction networks, revealing widespread, structurally plausible interactions in vivo . Overall, our work demonstrates how AlphaFold predictions can greatly expand our understanding of the structural forces that shape protein interaction networks and help reveal hidden layers of cellular complexes and pathways.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.08.15.670535

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00548 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/emboj/cdg359 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.str.2010.08.007 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.029 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.038 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nprot.2014.164 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/340245a0 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/pmic.200400856 · DOI
  9. 10.1083/jcb.201112098 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/nbt.4201 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-461 · DOI
  12. 10.1186/1479-7364-3-3-291 · DOI
  13. 2008, Improving yeast two-hybrid screening systems, Brief. Funct. Genomic. Proteomic, 6, 302, 10.1093/bfgp/elm035 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1074 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.bpc.2022.106769 · DOI
  16. Mollica, L. , Bessa, L.M. , Hanoulle, X. , Jensen, M.R. , Blackledge, M. and Schneider, R . (2016) Binding Mechanisms of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Theory, Simulation, and Experiment. Front. Mol. Biosci., 3. · DOI
  17. 10.1002/jmr.961 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.2406407121 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102958 · DOI
  20. 10.1098/rsob.210222 · DOI
  21. 10.2174/1381612811319230005 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/cr400525m · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.2304302120 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1038/s41594-022-00910-8 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/s41467-023-41721-9 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1038/S44320-023-00005-6/SUPPL_FILE/44320_2023_5_MOESM15_ESM.ZIP · DOI
  28. 2024, The Origin and Evolution of Sex Peptide and Sex Peptide Receptor Interactions, Mol. Biol. Evol, 41, msae065, 10.1093/molbev/msae065 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1038/nmeth.1931 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/PRO.3978 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1093/nar/29.17.3513 · DOI
  32. 10.1126/science.1087361 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/msb.2008.19 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1137/040608635 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.047 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1126/science.abm9129 · DOI
  38. 10.1128/MCB.01411-12 · DOI
  39. 2016, Identification of Novel Regulators of the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway that Control Border Cell Migration in the Drosophila Ovary, G3 GenesGenomesGenetics, 6, 1991, 10.1534/g3.116.028100 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/pro.4466 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 2022, Exploring protein-protein interactions at the proteome level, Structure, 30, 462, 10.1016/j.str.2022.02.004 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1101/2024.02.19.580970 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/J.CELL.2024.01.022 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.088 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.10.003 · DOI
  47. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001962 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103002 · DOI
  49. 2024, Benchmarking of AlphaFold2 accuracy self-estimates as indicators of empirical model quality and ranking: a comparison with independent model quality assessment programmes, Bioinformatics, 40, btae491, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae491 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.molcel.2025.01.034 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1101/2025.10.10.681672 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/s41586-023-07004-5 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/s41592-023-02159-5 · DOI
  54. 10.1093/nar/gkad928 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1002/prot.10532 · DOI
  58. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 2007, Achieving 80% ten[fold cross[validated accuracy for secondary structure prediction by large[scale training, Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinforma, 66, 838, 10.1002/prot.21298 · DOI
  60. Hagberg, A.A. , Schult, D.A. and Swart, P.J. (2008) Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX. In Varoquaux, G. , Vaught, T. , Millman, J. (eds), Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference. Pasadena, CA USA, pp. 11–15. · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1101/gr.1239303 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.4.380 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/s41592-025-02593-7 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/nar/gky949 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1038/s41592-022-01585-1 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Peng, J., & Zhao, L.
Affiliations
Rockefeller University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Li
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-08-20
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
e1013899-e1013899
ISSN
1553-734X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7125478495
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
10.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM133780)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, intrinsically disordered regions, AlphaFold2-Multimer, Drosophila

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review