PreprintCited by 13vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research

Inferring B cell specificity for vaccines using a mixture model

Open access
Fowler, Anna, Galson, Jacob D., Trück, Johannes, Kelly, Dominic F., Lunter, Gerton·2018·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.1186/s12864-020-6571-7

Abstract

Abstract Vaccines have greatly reduced the burden of infectious disease, ranking in their impact on global health second only after clean water. Most vaccines confer protection by the production of antibodies with binding affinity for the antigen, which is the main effector function of B cells. This results in short term changes in the B Cell receptor (BCR) repertoire when an immune response is launched, and long term changes when immunity is conferred. Analysis of antibodies in the serum is usually used to evaluate vaccine response, however this is limited and therefore the investigation of the BCR repertoire provides far more detail for the analysis of vaccine response. Here, we introduce a novel Bayesian model to describe the observed distribution of BCR sequences and the pattern of sharing across time and between individuals, with the goal to identify vaccine-specific BCR sequences. We use data from two studies to assess the model and estimate that we can identify vaccine-specific sequences with 69% sensitivity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/464792

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Amrutha Buddana and Tomasz J Kozubowski. Discrete pareto distribu- tions. Economic Quality Control, 29(2):143-156, 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fowler, A., Galson, J. D., Trück, J., Kelly, D. F., & Lunter, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
Corresponding author
Fowler, Anna
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2018-11-07
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
176-176
ISSN
1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3009102617
Cited by
12
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Genomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (PZ00P3_161147)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (161147, 183777)
  • NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Keywords
B cell receptor repertoire, vaccine response, Bayesian mixture models, antibody affinity, B cell receptor sequences, sequence similarity
MeSH terms
B-Lymphocytes, Bayes Theorem, Hepatitis B, Humans, Influenza, Human, Vaccines, Models, Immunological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review