Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

The Dreem Headband as an Alternative to Polysomnography for EEG Signal Acquisition and Sleep Staging

Arnal, Pierrick J., Thorey, Valentin, Ballard, Michael E., Hernandez, Albert Bou, Guillot, Antoine, Jourde, Hugo, Harris, Mason, Guillard, Mathias, Van Beers, Pascal, Chennaoui, Mounir, Sauvet, Fabien·2019

Preprint — published as 10.1093/sleep/zsaa097 · Paper page

Abstract

Despite the central role of sleep in our lives and the high prevalence of sleep disorders, sleep is still poorly understood. The development of ambulatory technologies capable of monitoring brain activity during sleep longitudinally is critical to advancing sleep science and facilitating the diagnosis of sleep disorders. We introduced the Dreem headband (DH) as an affordable, comfortable, and user-friendly alternative to polysomnography (PSG). The purpose of this study was to assess the signal acquisition of the DH and the performance of its embedded automatic sleep staging algorithms compared to the gold-standard clinical PSG scored by 5 sleep experts. Thirty-one subjects completed an over-night sleep study at a sleep center while wearing both a PSG and the DH simultaneously. We assessed 1) the EEG signal quality between the DH and the PSG, 2) the heart rate, breathing frequency, and respiration rate variability (RRV) agreement between the DH and the PSG, and 3) the performance of the DH’s automatic sleep staging according to AASM guidelines vs. PSG sleep experts manual scoring. Results demonstrate a strong correlation between the EEG signals acquired by the DH and those from the PSG, and the signals acquired by the DH enable monitoring of alpha (r= 0.71 ± 0.13), beta (r= 0.71 ± 0.18), delta (r = 0.76 ± 0.14), and theta (r = 0.61 ± 0.12) frequencies during sleep. The mean absolute error for heart rate, breathing frequency and RRV was 1.2 ± 0.5 bpm, 0.3 ± 0.2 cpm and 3.2 ± 0.6 %, respectively. Automatic Sleep Staging reached an overall accuracy of 83.5 ± 6.4% (F1 score : 83.8 ± 6.3) for the DH to be compared with an average of 86.4 ± 8.0% (F1 score: 86.3 ± 7.4) for the five sleep experts. These results demonstrate the capacity of the DH to both precisely monitor sleep-related physiological signals and process them accurately into sleep stages. This device paves the way for high-quality, large-scale, longitudinal sleep studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/662734

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 20

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1378/chest.14-0970 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.17241/smr.2011.2.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.5664/jcsm.4462 · DOI
  4. 10.1046/j.1365-2869.2001.00255.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.5664/jcsm.3630 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00700.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/sleep/zsx139 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/sleep/zsy078 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2813138 · DOI
  10. Siddharth Biswal , Joshua Kulas , Haoqi Sun , Balaji Goparaju , M Brandon Westover , Matt T Bianchi , and Jimeng Sun . SLEEPNET: Automated Sleep Staging System via Deep Learning. pages 1–17, 2017.
  11. 10.5665/sleep.2550 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/J.JNEUMETH.2019.03.017 · DOI
  13. 10.5665/sleep.3142 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1007/s11325-011-0585-y · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00088 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2011.00944.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1088/1741-2552/aae18f · DOI
  18. 10.5664/jcsm.6262 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00452 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.3389/fnins.2015.00438 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.14814/phy2.12949 · DOI
  22. 10.5664/jcsm.2350 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1145/24680.24681 · DOI
  25. J R Landis and G G Koch . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 1977. ISSN 0006-341X. · DOI · Paper page
  26. M. A. Lopez-Gordo , D. Sanchez Morillo , and F. Pelayo Valle . Dry EEG electrodes, 2014. ISSN 14248220. · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1109/RTEICT.2017.8256600 · DOI
  28. 10.3389/fninf.2017.00015 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s10558-009-9082-3 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Arnal, P. J., Thorey, V., Ballard, M. E., Hernandez, A. B., Guillot, A., Jourde, H., Harris, M., Guillard, M., Van Beers, P., Chennaoui, M., & Sauvet, F.
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2019-06-10
Cited by
20
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Dreem Headband as an Alternative to Polysomnography for EEG Signal Acquisition and Sleep Staging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/662734
The paper
Arnal, P. J., Thorey, V., Ballard, M. E., Hernandez, A. B., Guillot, A., Jourde, H., Harris, M., Guillard, M., Van Beers, P., Chennaoui, M., & Sauvet, F. (2019). The Dreem Headband as an Alternative to Polysomnography for EEG Signal Acquisition and Sleep Staging. https://doi.org/10.1101/662734

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.