The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of a noncanonical poly(A) site reveals a tripartite mechanism for vertebrate poly(A) site recognition
Open accessAbstract
At least half of all human pre-mRNAs are subject to alternative 3′ processing that may modulate both the coding capacity of the message and the array of post-transcriptional regulatory elements embedded within the 3′ UTR. Vertebrate poly(A) site selection appears to rely primarily on the binding of CPSF to an A(A/U)UAAA hexamer upstream of the cleavage site and CstF to a downstream GU-rich element. At least one-quarter of all human poly(A) sites, however, lack the A(A/U)UAAA motif. We report that sequence-specific RNA binding of the human 3′ processing factor CFI m can function as a primary determinant of poly(A) site recognition in the absence of the A(A/U)UAAA motif. CFI m is sufficient to direct sequence-specific, A(A/U)UAAA-independent poly(A) addition in vitro through the recruitment of the CPSF subunit hFip1 and poly(A) polymerase to the RNA substrate. ChIP analysis indicates that CFI m is recruited to the transcription unit, along with CPSF and CstF, during the initial stages of transcription, supporting a direct role for CFI m in poly(A) site recognition. The recognition of three distinct sequence elements by CFI m , CPSF, and CstF suggests that vertebrate poly(A) site definition is mechanistically more similar to that of yeast and plants than anticipated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Alternative polyadenylation of mRNA precursors
Tian, B., & Manley, J. L. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2016.116 · Cited by 1,179
Coupling mRNA processing with transcription in time and space
Bentley, D. L. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3662 · Cited by 828
Mechanisms and Consequences of Alternative Polyadenylation
Di Giammartino, D. C., Nishida, K., & Manley, J. L. (2011) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.017 · Cited by 737
Matoulkova, E., Michalova, E., Vojtesek, B., & Hrstka, R. (2012) · RNA Biology · doi:10.4161/rna.20231 · Cited by 357
Alternative cleavage and polyadenylation: the long and short of it
Tian, B., & Manley, J. L. (2013) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2013.03.005 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Venkataraman, K., Brown, K. M., & Gilmartin, G. M.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1315-1327
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2109302137
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of a noncanonical poly(A) site reveals a tripartite mechanism for vertebrate poly(A) site recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.1298605
- The paper
- Venkataraman, K., Brown, K. M., & Gilmartin, G. M. (2005). Analysis of a noncanonical poly(A) site reveals a tripartite mechanism for vertebrate poly(A) site recognition. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1298605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.