Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 702

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ATP-dependent remodeling and acetylation as regulators of chromatin fluidity

Open access
Kingston, R. E., Narlikar, G. J.·1999·Genes & Development

Abstract

It has become widely accepted that modification of nucleosome structure is an important regulatory mechanism. The hypothesis that the acetylation of histones is involved in regulation was first formed over thirty years ago by Allfrey and colleagues (Allfrey et al. 1964). Subsequent genetic studies suggested that complexes that utilize ATP hydrolysis to alter chromatin structure might also play a regulatory role. In the past 5 years, numerous ATP-dependent remodeling complexes, acetyltransferases, and acetyltransferase complexes have been isolated and characterized. With the identification of these complexes, it is now possible to examine how these complexes modulate gene expression, and how the action of these complexes can be coordinated. The two major classes of chromatin modifying complexes that have been characterized differ in whether or not they use covalent modification to alter chromatin structure (recent reviews include Felsenfeld et al. 1996; Hartzog and Winston 1997; Tsukiyama and Wu 1997; Gregory and Horz 1998; Imhof and Wolffe 1998; Kadonaga 1998; Kuo and Allis 1998; Mizzen and Allis 1998; Pollard and Peterson 1998; Varga-Weisz and Becker 1998; Workman and Kingston 1998). The first class consists of histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and deacetylase complexes, which, respectively, add and remove acetyl groups from the amino termini of the four core histones; increased acetylation is usually (but not always) associated with activation of gene expression, whereas decreased acetylation is associated with repression of gene expression. The second class consists of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes, which alter chromatin structure by changing the location or conformation of the nucleosome. These structural changes are accomplished without covalent modification, and can be involved in either activation or repression. In addition to these two major classes of complexes, there are also other recently identified complexes such as FACT, DRIP/ARC, and SPT4/SPT5 that help the transcription machinery contend with nucleosome structure (Hartzog et al. 1998; LeRoy et al. 1998; Orphanides et al. 1998; Wada et al. 1998; Naar et al. 1999; Rachez et al. 1999). The mode of action of these other complexes is not yet understood. This review focuses on ATP-dependent remodeling complexes and how these complexes interact with acetylation complexes to regulate gene expression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.13.18.2339

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 702

Metadata

Authors
Kingston, R. E., & Narlikar, G. J.
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
1999-09-15
Volume
13
Issue
18
Pages
2339-2352
ISSN
0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015472477
Cited by
702
References
7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ATP-dependent remodeling and acetylation as regulators of chromatin fluidity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.13.18.2339
The paper
Kingston, R. E., & Narlikar, G. J. (1999). ATP-dependent remodeling and acetylation as regulators of chromatin fluidity. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.18.2339

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.