Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Translation reprogramming is an evolutionarily conserved driver of phenotypic plasticity and therapeutic resistance in melanoma

Open access
Falletta, Paola, Sanchez-del-Campo, Luis, Chauhan, Jagat, Effern, Maike, Kenyon, Amy, Kershaw, Christopher J., Siddaway, Robert, Lisle, Richard, Freter, Rasmus, Daniels, Matthew J., Lu, Xin, Tüting, Thomas, Middleton, Mark, Buffa, Francesca M., Willis, Anne E., Pavitt, Graham, Ronai, Ze'ev A., Sauka-Spengler, Tatjana, Hölzel, Michael, Goding, Colin R.·2017·Genes & Development

Abstract

The intratumor microenvironment generates phenotypically distinct but interconvertible malignant cell subpopulations that fuel metastatic spread and therapeutic resistance. Whether different microenvironmental cues impose invasive or therapy-resistant phenotypes via a common mechanism is unknown. In melanoma, low expression of the lineage survival oncogene microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) correlates with invasion, senescence, and drug resistance. However, how MITF is suppressed in vivo and how MITF-low cells in tumors escape senescence are poorly understood. Here we show that microenvironmental cues, including inflammation-mediated resistance to adoptive T-cell immunotherapy, transcriptionally repress MITF via ATF4 in response to inhibition of translation initiation factor eIF2B. ATF4, a key transcription mediator of the integrated stress response, also activates AXL and suppresses senescence to impose the MITF-low/AXL-high drug-resistant phenotype observed in human tumors. However, unexpectedly, without translation reprogramming an ATF4-high/MITF-low state is insufficient to drive invasion. Importantly, translation reprogramming dramatically enhances tumorigenesis and is linked to a previously unexplained gene expression program associated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy resistance. Since we show that inhibition of eIF2B also drives neural crest migration and yeast invasiveness, our results suggest that translation reprogramming, an evolutionarily conserved starvation response, has been hijacked by microenvironmental stress signals in melanoma to drive phenotypic plasticity and invasion and determine therapeutic outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.290940.116

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Falletta, P., Sanchez-del-Campo, L., Chauhan, J., Effern, M., Kenyon, A., Kershaw, C. J., Siddaway, R., Lisle, R., Freter, R., Daniels, M. J., Lu, X., Tüting, T., Middleton, M., Buffa, F. M., Willis, A. E., Pavitt, G., Ronai, Z. A., Sauka-Spengler, T., Hölzel, M., & Goding, C. R.
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
18-33
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2577256604
Cited by
239
References
18
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Translation reprogramming is an evolutionarily conserved driver of phenotypic plasticity and therapeutic resistance in melanoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.290940.116
The paper
Falletta, P., Sanchez-del-Campo, L., Chauhan, J., Effern, M., Kenyon, A., Kershaw, C. J., Siddaway, R., Lisle, R., Freter, R., Daniels, M. J., Lu, X., Tüting, T., Middleton, M., Buffa, F. M., Willis, A. E., Pavitt, G., Ronai, Z. A., Sauka-Spengler, T., Hölzel, M., & Goding, C. R. (2017). Translation reprogramming is an evolutionarily conserved driver of phenotypic plasticity and therapeutic resistance in melanoma. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.290940.116

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.