The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mutations in the Drosophila gene extradenticle affect the way specific homeo domain proteins regulate segmental identity.
Open accessAbstract
We characterized a gene, extradenticle, which seems to interact with a specific subset of Drosophila homeo domain proteins, possibly affecting their target specificity. This interpretation is based on an examination of the zygotic and maternal effect phenotypes of extradenticle mutations. In embryos with reduced levels of extradenticle gene product, anterior and posterior segmental transformations occur. Segmental identity in Drosophila is mediated by the products of the Antennapedia and bithorax complexes. These homeo domain proteins are thought to regulate different target genes specifically in each segment, resulting in different morphologies. extradenticle alters segmental identity without affecting the pattern of expression of homeotic genes. Genetic tests demonstrate that in extradenticle mutants, the homeotic proteins are functional and act in their normal segmental domains, yet segmental identities are altered. Even when homeotic proteins are ectopically expressed under the control of a heterologous promoter, extradenticle mutations affect their consequences. Thus, in the absence of sufficient extradenticle product, altered segmental morphology results from alteration of the functional consequences of specific homeo domain proteins, possibly through alterations in their target gene specificity. extradenticle is also expressed maternally. Complete removal of extradenticle, maternally and zygotically, leads to specific alterations in segmentation, many of which result from failure to maintain the expression of the homeo domain protein engrailed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Segmental distribution of bithorax complex proteins during Drosophila development
Beachy, P. A., Helfand, S. L., & Hogness, D. S. (1985) · Nature · doi:10.1038/313545a0 · Cited by 413
Coleman, K. G., Poole, S. J., Weir, M. P., Soeller, W. C., & Kornberg, T. (1987) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1.1.19 · Cited by 153
Cited by
Homeobox genes and axial patterning
McGinnis, W., & Krumlauf, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90471-n · Cited by 2,674
Modulating Hox gene functions during animal body patterning
Pearson, J. C., Lemons, D., & McGinnis, W. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1726 · Cited by 879
Hoxa9 transforms primary bone marrow cells through specific collaboration with Meis1a but not Pbx1b
Kroon, E., Krosl, J., Thorsteinsdottir, U., Baban, S., Buchberg, A. M., & Sauvageau, G. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.13.3714 · Cited by 640
Low Affinity Binding Site Clusters Confer Hox Specificity and Regulatory Robustness
Crocker, J., Abe, N., Rinaldi, L., McGregor, A. P., Frankel, N., Wang, S., Alsawadi, A., Valenti, P., Plaza, S., Payre, F., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.041 · Cited by 363
Depew, M. J., Tucker, A. S., & Sharpe, P. T. (2002) · Mouse Development · doi:10.1016/b978-012597951-1/50023-8 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Peifer, M., & Wieschaus, E.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1990-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1209-1223
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2080938834
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutations in the Drosophila gene extradenticle affect the way specific homeo domain proteins regulate segmental identity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.4.7.1209
- The paper
- Peifer, M., & Wieschaus, E. (1990). Mutations in the Drosophila gene extradenticle affect the way specific homeo domain proteins regulate segmental identity. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.4.7.1209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.