The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An enhancer deletion affects both H19 and Igf2 expression.
Open accessAbstract
The distal end of mouse Chromosome 7 contains four tightly linked genes whose expression is dependent on their parental inheritance. Mash-2 and H19 are expressed exclusively from the maternal chromosome, whereas Insulin-2 (Ins-2) and Insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf2) are paternally expressed. The identical expression during development of the 3'-most genes in the cluster, Igf2 and H19, led to the proposal that their imprinting was mechanistically linked through a common set of transcriptional regulatory elements. To test this hypothesis, a targeted deletion of two endoderm-specific enhancers that lie 3' of H19 was generated by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Inheritance of the enhancer deletion through the maternal lineage led to a loss of H19 gene expression in cells of endodermal origin, including cells in the liver, gut, kidney, and lung. Paternal inheritance led to a very similar loss in the expression of Igf2 RNA in the same tissues. These results establish that H19 and Igf2 utilize the same endoderm enhancers, but on different parental chromosomes. Mice inheriting the enhancer deletion from fathers were 80% of normal size, reflecting a partial loss-of-function of Igf2. The reduction was uniformly observed in a number of internal organs, indicating that insulin-like growth factor II (IGFII), the product of Igf2, acts systemically in mice to affect prenatal growth. A modest decline in Ins-2 RNA was observed in the yolk sac. In contrast Mash-2, which is expressed in spongiotrophoblast cells of the placenta, was unaffected by the enhancer deletion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality
Li, E., Bestor, T. H., & Jaenisch, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90611-f · Cited by 3,984
Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war
Moore, T. (1991) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/0168-9525(91)90230-n · Cited by 1,281
Cited by
The functional role of long non-coding RNA in human carcinomas
Gibb, E. A., Brown, C. J., & Lam, W. L. (2011) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/1476-4598-10-38 · Cited by 1,619
CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus
Hark, A. T., Schoenherr, C. J., Katz, D. J., Ingram, R. S., Levorse, J. M., & Tilghman, S. M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35013106 · Cited by 1,547
Self-citationTranscription regulation and animal diversity
Levine, M., & Tjian, R. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01763 · Cited by 1,309
Quantitative analysis of chromosome conformation capture assays (3C-qPCR)
Hagège, H., Klous, P., Braem, C., Splinter, E., Dekker, J., Cathala, G., de Laat, W., & Forné, T. (2007) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.243 · Cited by 720
Differential Effects of Culture on Imprinted H19 Expression in the Preimplantation Mouse Embryo1
Doherty, A. S., Mann, M. R. W., Tremblay, K. D., Bartolomei, M. S., & Schultz, R. M. (2000) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod62.6.1526 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Leighton, P. A., Saam, J. R., Ingram, R. S., Stewart, C. L., & Tilghman, S. M.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1995-09-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2079-2089
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2164704209
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An enhancer deletion affects both H19 and Igf2 expression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.9.17.2079
- The paper
- Leighton, P. A., Saam, J. R., Ingram, R. S., Stewart, C. L., & Tilghman, S. M. (1995). An enhancer deletion affects both H19 and Igf2 expression. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.9.17.2079
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.