Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A high-resolution association mapping panel for the dissection of complex traits in mice

Open access
Bennett, Brian J., Farber, Charles R., Orozco, Luz, Min Kang, Hyun, Ghazalpour, Anatole, Siemers, Nathan, Neubauer, Michael, Neuhaus, Isaac, Yordanova, Roumyana, Guan, Bo, Truong, Amy, Yang, Wen-pin, He, Aiqing, Kayne, Paul, Gargalovic, Peter, Kirchgessner, Todd, Pan, Calvin, Castellani, Lawrence W., Kostem, Emrah, Furlotte, Nicholas, Drake, Thomas A., Eskin, Eleazar, Lusis, Aldons J.·2010·Genome Research

Abstract

Systems genetics relies on common genetic variants to elucidate biologic networks contributing to complex disease-related phenotypes. Mice are ideal model organisms for such approaches, but linkage analysis has been only modestly successful due to low mapping resolution. Association analysis in mice has the potential of much better resolution, but it is confounded by population structure and inadequate power to map traits that explain less than 10% of the variance, typical of mouse quantitative trait loci (QTL). We report a novel strategy for association mapping that combines classic inbred strains for mapping resolution and recombinant inbred strains for mapping power. Using a mixed model algorithm to correct for population structure, we validate the approach by mapping over 2500 cis-expression QTL with a resolution an order of magnitude narrower than traditional QTL analysis. We also report the fine mapping of metabolic traits such as plasma lipids. This resource, termed the Hybrid Mouse Diversity Panel, makes possible the integration of multiple data sets and should prove useful for systems-based approaches to complex traits and studies of gene-by-environment interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.099234.109

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Bennett, B. J., Farber, C. R., Orozco, L., Min Kang, H., Ghazalpour, A., Siemers, N., Neubauer, M., Neuhaus, I., Yordanova, R., Guan, B., Truong, A., Yang, W.-P., He, A., Kayne, P., Gargalovic, P., Kirchgessner, T., Pan, C., Castellani, L. W., Kostem, E., Furlotte, N., Drake, T. A., Eskin, E., & Lusis, A. J.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2010-01-06
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
281-290
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158534900
Cited by
317
References
55
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A high-resolution association mapping panel for the dissection of complex traits in mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.099234.109
The paper
Bennett, B. J., Farber, C. R., Orozco, L., Min Kang, H., Ghazalpour, A., Siemers, N., Neubauer, M., Neuhaus, I., Yordanova, R., Guan, B., Truong, A., Yang, W.-P., He, A., Kayne, P., Gargalovic, P., Kirchgessner, T., Pan, C., Castellani, L. W., Kostem, E., . . . Lusis, A. J. (2010). A high-resolution association mapping panel for the dissection of complex traits in mice. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.099234.109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.