The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Control of Population Structure in Model Organism Association Mapping
Open accessAbstract
Genomewide association mapping in model organisms such as inbred mouse strains is a promising approach for the identification of risk factors related to human diseases. However, genetic association studies in inbred model organisms are confronted by the problem of complex population structure among strains. This induces inflated false positive rates, which cannot be corrected using standard approaches applied in human association studies such as genomic control or structured association. Recent studies demonstrated that mixed models successfully correct for the genetic relatedness in association mapping in maize and Arabidopsis panel data sets. However, the currently available mixed-model methods suffer from computational inefficiency. In this article, we propose a new method, efficient mixed-model association (EMMA), which corrects for population structure and genetic relatedness in model organism association mapping. Our method takes advantage of the specific nature of the optimization problem in applying mixed models for association mapping, which allows us to substantially increase the computational speed and reliability of the results. We applied EMMA to in silico whole-genome association mapping of inbred mouse strains involving hundreds of thousands of SNPs, in addition to Arabidopsis and maize data sets. We also performed extensive simulation studies to estimate the statistical power of EMMA under various SNP effects, varying degrees of population structure, and differing numbers of multiple measurements per strain. Despite the limited power of inbred mouse association mapping due to the limited number of available inbred strains, we are able to identify significantly associated SNPs, which fall into known QTL or genes identified through previous studies while avoiding an inflation of false positives. An R package implementation and webserver of our EMMA method are publicly available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies
Price, A. L., Patterson, N. J., Plenge, R. M., Weinblatt, M. E., Shadick, N. A., & Reich, D. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1847 · Cited by 10,248
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
Population Structure and Eigenanalysis
Patterson, N., Price, A. L., & Reich, D. (2006) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020190 · Cited by 5,280
Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data
Verbeke, G. (1997) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2294-1_3 · Cited by 3,506
Genomic Control for Association Studies
Devlin, B., & Roeder, K. (1999) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00997.x · Cited by 3,162 · cited 1×
“The most widely used methods to reduce such bias in human association mapping are genomic control (D evlin and R oeder 1999), structured association (P ritchard et al. 2000), and principal component analysis (P atterson et al. 2006; P rice et al. 2006).”
MethodGeneralized Analysis of Molecular Variance
Nievergelt, C. M., Libiger, O., & Schork, N. J. (2007) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030051 · Cited by 80
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- 2001, Exp. Anim., 50, 319, 10.1538/expanim.50.319 · DOI
- 2005, PLoS Genet., 1, e60, 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010060 · DOI · Paper page
- 2006, Theor. Appl. Genet., 112, 876, 10.1007/s00122-005-0189-7 · doi:10.1007/s00122-005-0189-7
- 1998, Behav. Genet., 28, 29, 10.1023/A:1021404714631 · DOI
- 2007, Science, 315, 1583
- 2005, Nat. Genet., 37, 225, 10.1038/ng1497 · DOI · Paper page
- 2007, PLoS One, 2, e591, 10.1371/journal.pone.0000591 · DOI
- 2001, Mol. Ecol., 10, 1539, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01288.x · DOI · Paper page
- 2007, Genetics, 175, 321, 10.1534/genetics.106.065359 · DOI
- 2004, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 66, 165, 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2004.00438.x · DOI · Paper page
- 1981, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 76, 341, 10.1080/01621459.1981.10477653 · DOI · Paper page
- 1996, Mol. Biol. Evol., 13, 93, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025575 · DOI · Paper page
- 1967, Science, 155, 279, 10.1126/science.155.3760.279 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, Nat. Rev. Genet., 6, 271
- 2005, Plant J., 44, 1054, 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02591.x · DOI · Paper page
- 2007, Nature, 448, 1050, 10.1038/nature06067 · DOI · Paper page
- 1995, Biometrics, 51, 1440, 10.2307/2533274 · DOI · Paper page
- 1987, J. Anim. Sci., 64, 1362, 10.2527/jas1987.6451362x · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Genetics, 167, 531, 10.1534/genetics.167.1.531 · DOI
- 2004, Bioinformatics, 20, 1842, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth149 · DOI · Paper page
- 1974, Biometrika, 61, 381
- 2002, Plant Physiol., 129, 440, 10.1104/pp.003533 · DOI · Paper page
- 1995, J. Dairy Sci., 78, 449, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76654-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 1992, J. Anim. Sci., 70, 2000, 10.2527/1992.7072000x · DOI · Paper page
- 1989, J. Mol. Evol., 29, 170, 10.1007/BF02100115 · DOI · Paper page
- 2002, Physiol. Genomics, 10, 21, 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00018.2002 · DOI
- 1988, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 83, 1014
- 2006, Nat. Genet., 38, 888, 10.1038/ng1849 · DOI
- 1999, Genetics, 152, 1753, 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1753 · DOI · Paper page
- 2007, Genetics, 175, 879, 10.1534/genetics.105.054932 · DOI · Paper page
- 1997, Am. Nat., 149, 646, 10.1086/286013 · DOI · Paper page
- 2002, Funct. Integr. Genomics, 2, 98, 10.1007/s10142-002-0053-7 · doi:10.1007/s10142-002-0053-7
- 2007, Genetics, 176, 675, 10.1534/genetics.106.066241 · DOI
- 1989, Genet. Sel. Evol., 21, 318
- 1965, Comput. J., 7, 308, 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, PLoS Biol., 3, e196, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030196 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, Mol. Biol. Evol., 22, 40, 10.1093/molbev/msh257 · DOI
- 1971, Biometrika, 58, 545, 10.1093/biomet/58.3.545 · DOI · Paper page
- 2007, Nat. Rev. Genet., 8, 58, 10.1038/nrg2025 · DOI · Paper page
- 2001, Genetics, 157, 425, 10.1093/genetics/157.1.425 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, PLoS Biol., 2, e393, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020393 · DOI · Paper page
- 2000, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 67, 170, 10.1086/302959 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, J. Neurosci., 24, 938, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1374-03.2004 · DOI
- 2004, Mamm. Genome, 15, 100, 10.1007/s00335-003-2308-6 · DOI
- 2000, Genetics, 155, 1961, 10.1093/genetics/155.4.1961 · DOI
- 2002, Genetics, 160, 1203, 10.1093/genetics/160.3.1203 · DOI · Paper page
- 1997, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 59, 701, 10.1111/1467-9868.00092 · DOI
- 2006, Nat. Genet., 38, 203, 10.1038/ng1702 · DOI · Paper page
- 2007, PLoS Genet., 3, e4, 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030004 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, Genetics, 170, 1299, 10.1534/genetics.104.035709 · DOI
Cited by
Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies
Zhou, X., & Stephens, M. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2310 · Cited by 3,627
“…algorithm for computing (effectively) exact association test statistics (either the Wald test or the likelihood ratio test), implemented in the Efficient Mixed Model Association (EMMA) software 3 , had a per-SNP computational time that increases with the cube of the number of individuals ( n ).”
MethodVariance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies
Kang, H. M., Sul, J. H., Service, S. K., Zaitlen, N. A., Kong, S.-Y., Freimer, N. B., Sabatti, C., & Eskin, E. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.548 · Cited by 2,817
Self-citationRidge Regression and Other Kernels for Genomic Selection with R Package rrBLUP
Endelman, J. B. (2011) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.3835/plantgenome2011.08.0024 · Cited by 2,094
Efficient Bayesian mixed-model analysis increases association power in large cohorts
Loh, P.-R., Tucker, G., Bulik-Sullivan, B. K., Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Finucane, H. K., Salem, R. M., Chasman, D. I., Ridker, P. M., Neale, B. M., Berger, B., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3190 · Cited by 1,507
Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines
Atwell, S., Huang, Y. S., Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Willems, G., Horton, M., Li, Y., Meng, D., Platt, A., Tarone, A. M., Hu, T. T., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08800 · Cited by 1,780
Metadata
- Authors
- Kang, H. M., Zaitlen, N. A., Wade, C. M., Kirby, A., Heckerman, D., Daly, M. J., & Eskin, E.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-03-01
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1709-1723
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2127684760
- Cited by
- 1,835
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 27.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient Control of Population Structure in Model Organism Association Mapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.107.080101
- The paper
- Kang, H. M., Zaitlen, N. A., Wade, C. M., Kirby, A., Heckerman, D., Daly, M. J., & Eskin, E. (2008). Efficient Control of Population Structure in Model Organism Association Mapping. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.080101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.