Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,835

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient Control of Population Structure in Model Organism Association Mapping

Open access
Kang, Hyun Min, Zaitlen, Noah A, Wade, Claire M, Kirby, Andrew, Heckerman, David, Daly, Mark J, Eskin, Eleazar·2008·Genetics

Abstract

Genomewide association mapping in model organisms such as inbred mouse strains is a promising approach for the identification of risk factors related to human diseases. However, genetic association studies in inbred model organisms are confronted by the problem of complex population structure among strains. This induces inflated false positive rates, which cannot be corrected using standard approaches applied in human association studies such as genomic control or structured association. Recent studies demonstrated that mixed models successfully correct for the genetic relatedness in association mapping in maize and Arabidopsis panel data sets. However, the currently available mixed-model methods suffer from computational inefficiency. In this article, we propose a new method, efficient mixed-model association (EMMA), which corrects for population structure and genetic relatedness in model organism association mapping. Our method takes advantage of the specific nature of the optimization problem in applying mixed models for association mapping, which allows us to substantially increase the computational speed and reliability of the results. We applied EMMA to in silico whole-genome association mapping of inbred mouse strains involving hundreds of thousands of SNPs, in addition to Arabidopsis and maize data sets. We also performed extensive simulation studies to estimate the statistical power of EMMA under various SNP effects, varying degrees of population structure, and differing numbers of multiple measurements per strain. Despite the limited power of inbred mouse association mapping due to the limited number of available inbred strains, we are able to identify significantly associated SNPs, which fall into known QTL or genes identified through previous studies while avoiding an inflation of false positives. An R package implementation and webserver of our EMMA method are publicly available.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.107.080101

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 2001, Exp. Anim., 50, 319, 10.1538/expanim.50.319 · DOI
  2. 2005, PLoS Genet., 1, e60, 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010060 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2006, Theor. Appl. Genet., 112, 876, 10.1007/s00122-005-0189-7 · doi:10.1007/s00122-005-0189-7
  4. 1998, Behav. Genet., 28, 29, 10.1023/A:1021404714631 · DOI
  5. 2007, Science, 315, 1583
  6. 2005, Nat. Genet., 37, 225, 10.1038/ng1497 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2007, PLoS One, 2, e591, 10.1371/journal.pone.0000591 · DOI
  8. 2001, Mol. Ecol., 10, 1539, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01288.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2007, Genetics, 175, 321, 10.1534/genetics.106.065359 · DOI
  10. 2004, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 66, 165, 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2004.00438.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. 1981, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 76, 341, 10.1080/01621459.1981.10477653 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 1996, Mol. Biol. Evol., 13, 93, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025575 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 1967, Science, 155, 279, 10.1126/science.155.3760.279 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 2005, Nat. Rev. Genet., 6, 271
  15. 2005, Plant J., 44, 1054, 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02591.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2007, Nature, 448, 1050, 10.1038/nature06067 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 1995, Biometrics, 51, 1440, 10.2307/2533274 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 1987, J. Anim. Sci., 64, 1362, 10.2527/jas1987.6451362x · DOI · Paper page
  19. 2004, Genetics, 167, 531, 10.1534/genetics.167.1.531 · DOI
  20. 2004, Bioinformatics, 20, 1842, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth149 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 1974, Biometrika, 61, 381
  22. 2002, Plant Physiol., 129, 440, 10.1104/pp.003533 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 1995, J. Dairy Sci., 78, 449, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76654-1 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 1992, J. Anim. Sci., 70, 2000, 10.2527/1992.7072000x · DOI · Paper page
  25. 1989, J. Mol. Evol., 29, 170, 10.1007/BF02100115 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 2002, Physiol. Genomics, 10, 21, 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00018.2002 · DOI
  27. 1988, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 83, 1014
  28. 2006, Nat. Genet., 38, 888, 10.1038/ng1849 · DOI
  29. 1999, Genetics, 152, 1753, 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1753 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 2007, Genetics, 175, 879, 10.1534/genetics.105.054932 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 1997, Am. Nat., 149, 646, 10.1086/286013 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 2002, Funct. Integr. Genomics, 2, 98, 10.1007/s10142-002-0053-7 · doi:10.1007/s10142-002-0053-7
  33. 2007, Genetics, 176, 675, 10.1534/genetics.106.066241 · DOI
  34. 1989, Genet. Sel. Evol., 21, 318
  35. 1965, Comput. J., 7, 308, 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 2005, PLoS Biol., 3, e196, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030196 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 2005, Mol. Biol. Evol., 22, 40, 10.1093/molbev/msh257 · DOI
  38. 1971, Biometrika, 58, 545, 10.1093/biomet/58.3.545 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 2007, Nat. Rev. Genet., 8, 58, 10.1038/nrg2025 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 2001, Genetics, 157, 425, 10.1093/genetics/157.1.425 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 2004, PLoS Biol., 2, e393, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020393 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 2000, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 67, 170, 10.1086/302959 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 2004, J. Neurosci., 24, 938, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1374-03.2004 · DOI
  44. 2004, Mamm. Genome, 15, 100, 10.1007/s00335-003-2308-6 · DOI
  45. 2000, Genetics, 155, 1961, 10.1093/genetics/155.4.1961 · DOI
  46. 2002, Genetics, 160, 1203, 10.1093/genetics/160.3.1203 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 1997, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 59, 701, 10.1111/1467-9868.00092 · DOI
  48. 2006, Nat. Genet., 38, 203, 10.1038/ng1702 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 2007, PLoS Genet., 3, e4, 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030004 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 2005, Genetics, 170, 1299, 10.1534/genetics.104.035709 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,835

Metadata

Authors
Kang, H. M., Zaitlen, N. A., Wade, C. M., Kirby, A., Heckerman, D., Daly, M. J., & Eskin, E.
Venue
Genetics
Published
2008-03-01
Volume
178
Issue
3
Pages
1709-1723
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W2127684760
Cited by
1,835
References
8
FWCI
27.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient Control of Population Structure in Model Organism Association Mapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.107.080101
The paper
Kang, H. M., Zaitlen, N. A., Wade, C. M., Kirby, A., Heckerman, D., Daly, M. J., & Eskin, E. (2008). Efficient Control of Population Structure in Model Organism Association Mapping. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.080101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.