The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shotgun proteomics aids discovery of novel protein-coding genes, alternative splicing, and “resurrected” pseudogenes in the mouse genome
Open accessAbstract
Recent advances in proteomic mass spectrometry (MS) offer the chance to marry high-throughput peptide sequencing to transcript models, allowing the validation, refinement, and identification of new protein-coding loci. We present a novel pipeline that integrates highly sensitive and statistically robust peptide spectrum matching with genome-wide protein-coding predictions to perform large-scale gene validation and discovery in the mouse genome for the first time. In searching an excess of 10 million spectra, we have been able to validate 32%, 17%, and 7% of all protein-coding genes, exons, and splice boundaries, respectively. Moreover, we present strong evidence for the identification of multiple alternatively spliced translations from 53 genes and have uncovered 10 entirely novel protein-coding genes, which are not covered in any mouse annotation data sources. One such novel protein-coding gene is a fusion protein that spans the Ins2 and Igf2 loci to produce a transcript encoding the insulin II and the insulin-like growth factor 2–derived peptides. We also report nine processed pseudogenes that have unique peptide hits, demonstrating, for the first time, that they are not just transcribed but are translated and are therefore resurrected into new coding loci. This work not only highlights an important utility for MS data in genome annotation but also provides unique insights into the gene structure and propagation in the mouse genome. All these data have been subsequently used to improve the publicly available mouse annotation available in both the Vega and Ensembl genome browsers (http://vega.sanger.ac.uk).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Initial efforts to assess the contribution of alternative splicing to proteomic composition and diversity have focused exclusively on the identification of proteins derived from alternatively spliced transcripts in a steady-state system (Blakeley et al., 2010, Brosch et al., 2011, Ezkurdia et al., 2012, Lander et al., 2001, Leoni et al., 2011, Tress et al., 2008, Xing et al., 2011, Zhou et al., 2”
From Impact of Alternative Splicing on the Human Proteome (2017) · cites this paper as Brosch et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, C. F. G. R., Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057062 · Cited by 24,216
Self-citationStatistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D., Creasy, D. M., & Cottrell, J. S. (1999) · Electrophoresis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2683(19991201)20:18 · Cited by 8,264
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05874 · Cited by 5,223
Self-citationAlternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes
Wang, E. T., Sandberg, R., Luo, S., Khrebtukova, I., Zhang, L., Mayr, C., Kingsmore, S. F., Schroth, G. P., & Burge, C. B. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07509 · Cited by 5,181
Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A., Kolker, E., & Aebersold, R. (2002) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac025747h · Cited by 4,970
Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA
Burge, C., & Karlin, S. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.0951 · Cited by 4,211
Roepstorff, P., & Fohlman, J. (1984) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/bms.1200111109 · Cited by 2,705
Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets
Käll, L., Canterbury, J. D., Weston, J., Noble, W. S., & MacCoss, M. J. (2007) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth1113 · Cited by 2,424
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Next-generation proteomics: towards an integrative view of proteome dynamics
Altelaar, M. A. F., Muñoz, J., & Heck, A. J. R. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3356 · Cited by 802
Proteogenomics: concepts, applications and computational strategies
Nesvizhskii, A. I. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3144 · Cited by 797
Multiple evidence strands suggest that there may be as few as 19 000 human protein-coding genes
Ezkurdia, I., Juan, D., Rodrı́guez, J. M., Frankish, A., Diekhans, M., Harrow, J., Vázquez, J., Valencia, A., & Tress, M. L. (2014) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddu309 · Cited by 583
Self-citationOvercoming challenges and dogmas to understand the functions of pseudogenes
Cheetham, S. W., Faulkner, G. J., & Dinger, M. E. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0196-1 · Cited by 294
APPRIS: annotation of principal and alternative splice isoforms
Rodriguez, J. M., Maietta, P., Ezkurdia, I., Pietrelli, A., Wesselink, J.-J., Lopez, G., Valencia, A., & Tress, M. L. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1058 · Cited by 232
HiRIEF LC-MS enables deep proteome coverage and unbiased proteogenomics
Branca, R. M., Orre, L. M., Johansson, H. J., Granholm, V., Huss, M., Pérez-Bercoff, Å., Forshed, J., Käll, L., & Lehtiö, J. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2732 · Cited by 271
Alternative Splicing and Protein Diversity: Plants Versus Animals
Chaudhary, S., Khokhar, W., Jabre, I., Reddy, A. S. N., Byrne, L. J., Wilson, C. M., & Syed, N. H. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00708 · Cited by 209
Pérez‐Riverol, Y., Alpi, E., Wang, R., Hermjakob, H., & Vizcaíno, J. A. (2014) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201400302 · Cited by 202
Impact of Alternative Splicing on the Human Proteome
Liu, Y., Gonzàlez-Porta, M., Santos, S., Brazma, A., Marioni, J. C., Aebersold, R., Venkitaraman, A. R., & Wickramasinghe, V. O. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.025 · Cited by 190
Coming of age: orphan genes in plants
Arendsee, Z. W., Li, L., & Wurtele, E. S. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2014.07.003 · Cited by 185
Creating reference gene annotation for the mouse C57BL6/J genome assembly
Mudge, J. M., & Harrow, J. (2015) · Mammalian Genome · doi:10.1007/s00335-015-9583-x · Cited by 173
Self-citationMárquez, Y., Höpfler, M., Ayatollahi, Z., Barta, A., & Kalyna, M. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.186585.114 · Cited by 172
Pseudogene-derived lncRNAs: emerging regulators of gene expression
Milligan, M. J., & Lipovich, L. (2015) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2014.00476 · Cited by 156
Pseudogenes: newly discovered players in human cancer.
Poliseno, L. (2012) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.2002858 · Cited by 170
Genotype to phenotype via network analysis
Carter, H., Hofree, M., & Ideker, T. (2013) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2013.10.003 · Cited by 132
Perspective on Alternative Splicing and Proteome Complexity in Plants
Chaudhary, S., Jabre, I., Reddy, A. S. N., Staiger, D., & Syed, N. H. (2019) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.02.006 · Cited by 135
Discovery and mass spectrometric analysis of novel splice-junction peptides using RNA-Seq
Sheynkman, G. M., Shortreed, M. R., Frey, B. L., & Smith, L. M. (2013) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o113.028142 · Cited by 128
Regulatory Roles for Long ncRNA and mRNA
Karapetyan, A., Buiting, C., Kuiper, R. A., & Coolen, M. W. (2013) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers5020462 · Cited by 107
Sheynkman, G., Shortreed, M. R., Cesnik, A. J., & Smith, L. M. (2016) · Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-anchem-071015-041722 · Cited by 102
Wang, X., Codreanu, S. G., Wen, B., Li, K., Chambers, M. C., Liebler, D. C., & Zhang, B. (2018) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.ra117.000155 · Cited by 97
Data integration and predictive modeling methods for multi-omics datasets
Kim, M., & Tagkopoulos, I. (2017) · Molecular Omics · doi:10.1039/c7mo00051k · Cited by 106
Progress and Challenges in Ocean Metaproteomics and Proposed Best Practices for Data Sharing
Saito, M. A., Bertrand, E. M., Duffy, M. E., Gaylord, D. A., Held, N. A., Hervey, W. J., Hettich, R. L., Jagtap, P. D., Janech, M. G., Kinkade, D. B., et al. (2019) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00761 · Cited by 99
A Golden Age for Working with Public Proteomics Data
Martens, L., & Vizcaíno, J. A. (2017) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2017.01.001 · Cited by 100
Blakeley, P., Overton, I. M., & Hubbard, S. J. (2012) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr300411q · Cited by 92
Ezkurdia, I., del Pozo, A., Frankish, A., Rodriguez, J. M., Harrow, J., Ashman, K., Valencia, A., & Tress, M. L. (2012) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mss100 · Cited by 89
Self-citationProteogenomics from a bioinformatics angle: A growing field
Menschaert, G., & Fenyö, D. (2015) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21483 · Cited by 90
Abascal, F., Ezkurdia, I., Rodriguez-Rivas, J., Rodríguez, J. M., del Pozo, Á., Vázquez, J., Valencia, A., & Tress, M. L. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004325 · Cited by 88
Exploring the potential of public proteomics data
Vaudel, M., Verheggen, K., Csordás, A., Ræder, H., Berven, F. S., Martens, L., Vizcaíno, J. A., & Barsnes, H. (2015) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201500295 · Cited by 84
Gascoigne, D. K., Cheetham, S. W., Cattenoz, P. B., Clark, M. B., Amaral, P., Taft, R. J., Wilhelm, D., Dinger, M. E., & Mattick, J. S. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts582 · Cited by 85
Krug, K., Carpy, A., Behrends, G., Matić, K., Soares, N. C., & Maček, B. (2013) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m113.029165 · Cited by 76
Improving GENCODE reference gene annotation using a high-stringency proteogenomics workflow
Wright, J. C., Mudge, J. M., Weisser, H., Barzine, M., González, J. M., Brāzma, A., Choudhary, J. S., & Harrow, J. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11778 · Cited by 76
Self-citationLncRNA BCAR4 wires up signaling transduction in breast cancer
Xing, Z., Park, P. K., Lin, C., & Yang, L. (2015) · RNA Biology · doi:10.1080/15476286.2015.1053687 · Cited by 73
Grabski, D. F., Broséus, L., Kumari, B., Rekosh, D. M., Hammarskjöld, M., & Ritchie, W. (2020) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews - RNA · doi:10.1002/wrna.1631 · Cited by 78
Quantitative profiling of peptides from RNAs classified as noncoding
Prabakaran, S., Hemberg, M., Chauhan, R. S., Winter, D., Tweedie‐Cullen, R. Y., Dittrich, C., Hong, E. J., Gunawardena, J., Steen, H., Kreiman, G., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6429 · Cited by 68
Protein-Coding Genes’ Retrocopies and Their Functions
Kubiak, M. R., & Makałowska, I. (2017) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v9040080 · Cited by 65
Functional transcriptomics in the post-ENCODE eraPreprint
Mudge, J. M., Frankish, A., & Harrow, J. (2013) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.161315.113 · Cited by 64
Self-citationTargeted proteome investigation via selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry
Maiolica, A., Jünger, M. A., Ezkurdia, I., & Aebersold, R. H. (2012) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2012.04.048 · Cited by 60
Khatun, J., Yu, Y., Wrobel, J. A., Risk, B. A., Gunawardena, H. P., Secrest, A., Spitzer, W. J., Xie, L., Wang, L., Chen, X., et al. (2013) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-141 · Cited by 61
PGTools: A Software Suite for Proteogenomic Data Analysis and Visualization
Nagaraj, S. H., Waddell, N., Madugundu, A. K., Wood, S., Jones, A., Mandyam, R. A., Nones, K., Pearson, J. V., & Grimmond, S. M. (2015) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00029 · Cited by 55
UBB pseudogene 4 encodes functional ubiquitin variants
Dubois, M., Meller, A., Samandi, S., Brunelle, M., Frion, J., Brunet, M. A., Toupin, A., Beaudoin, M. C., Jacques, J., Lévesque, D., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15090-6 · Cited by 58
Bernhardt, M., Galach, M., Novak, D., & Utikal, J. S. (2012) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201100347 · Cited by 55
Pseudogenes are not pseudo any more
Wen, Y., Zheng, L., Qu, L., Ayala, F. J., & Lun, Z. (2012) · RNA Biology · doi:10.4161/rna.9.1.18277 · Cited by 49
Genomic copy number variation in Mus musculus
Locke, M. E. O., Milojevic, M., Eitutis, S. T., Patel, N., Wishart, A. E., Daley, M., & Hill, K. A. (2015) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1713-z · Cited by 51
Park, G. W., Hwang, H., Kim, K. H., Lee, J. Y., Lee, H. K., Park, J. Y., Ji, E. S., Park, S. K. R., Yates, J. R., Kwon, K., et al. (2016) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00376 · Cited by 48
The Vertebrate Genome Annotation browser 10 years on
Harrow, J., Steward, C. A., Frankish, A., Gilbert, J. G. R., González, J. M., Loveland, J. E., Mudge, J. M., Sheppard, D., Thomas, M., Trevanion, S. J., et al. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1241 · Cited by 45
Self-citationPang, C. N. I., Tay, A. P., Aya, C., Twine, N. A., Harkness, L., Hart‐Smith, G., Chia, S. Z., Chen, Z., Deshpande, N., Kaakoush, N. O., et al. (2013) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr400820p · Cited by 44
The proteome under translational control
Fijałkowska, D., Gevaert, K., & Damme, P. V. (2014) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201400165 · Cited by 41
Long-read cDNA sequencing identifies functional pseudogenes in the human transcriptome
Troskie, R., Jafrani, Y., Mercer, T. R., Ewing, A. D., Faulkner, G. J., & Cheetham, S. W. (2021) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02369-0 · Cited by 41
Collins, M. O., Wright, J. C., Jones, M. L., Rayner, J. C., & Choudhary, J. S. (2014) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2014.03.010 · Cited by 37
Self-citationEvolution and function of developmentally dynamic pseudogenes in mammals
Qian, S. H., Chen, L., Xiong, Y.-L., & Chen, Z. (2022) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-022-02802-y · Cited by 39
Kumar, D., Yadav, A. K., Jia, X., Mulvenna, J. P., & Dash, D. (2015) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m114.047126 · Cited by 35
A note on the false discovery rate of novel peptides in proteogenomics
Zhang, K., Fu, Y., Zeng, W., He, K., Chi, H., Liu, C., Li, Y., Gao, Y., Xu, P., & He, S. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv340 · Cited by 34
Wang, X., & Zhang, B. (2014) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr500194t · Cited by 33
Frankish, A., & Harrow, J. (2014) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0835-6_10 · Cited by 32
Self-citationCharacterizing Cardiac Molecular Mechanisms of Mammalian Hibernation via Quantitative Proteogenomics
Vermillion, K. L., Jagtap, P. D., Johnson, J. E., Griffin, T. J., & Andrews, M. T. (2015) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00575 · Cited by 29
Inferring the effect of genomic variation in the new era of genomics
Chakravorty, S., & Hegde, M. (2018) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.23427 · Cited by 29
Wu, P., Zhang, H., Lin, W., Hao, Y., Ren, L., Zhang, C., Li, N., Wei, H., Jiang, Y., & He, F. (2014) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr4012206 · Cited by 29
The importance of identifying alternative splicing in vertebrate genome annotation
Frankish, A., Mudge, J. M., Thomas, M., & Harrow, J. (2012) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/bas014 · Cited by 27
Self-citationAnnotation of the Domestic Pig Genome by Quantitative Proteogenomics
Marx, H., Hahne, H., Ulbrich, S. E., Schnieke, A., Rottmann, O., Frishman, D., & Küster, B. (2017) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00184 · Cited by 26
Plant Proteogenomics: Improvements to the Grapevine Genome Annotation
Chapman, B., & Bellgard, M. (2017) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201700197 · Cited by 24
Yagoub, D., Tay, A. P., Chen, Z., Hamey, J. J., Cai, C., Chia, S. Z., Hart‐Smith, G., & Wilkins, M. R. (2015) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00734 · Cited by 23
Chocu, S., Evrard, B., Lavigne, R., Rolland, A. D., Aubry, F., Jégou, B., Chalmel, F., & Pineau, C. (2014) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod.114.122416 · Cited by 28
Ren, Z., Qi, D., Pugh, N., Li, K., Wen, B., Zhou, R., Xu, S., Liu, S., & Jones, A. R. (2018) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.ra118.000832 · Cited by 24
Pseudogene Associated Recurrent Gene Fusion in Prostate Cancer
Chakravarthi, B. V. S. K., Arachchige, P. D., Carskadon, S. L., Sundaram, S. K., Li, J., Wu, K.-H. H., Chandrashekar, D. S., Peabody, J. O., Stricker, H. J., Hwang, C., et al. (2019) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1016/j.neo.2019.07.010 · Cited by 23
Toward an Upgraded Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genome Annotation Using Proteogenomics
McAfee, A., Harpur, B. A., Michaud, S., Beavis, R. C., Kent, C. F., Zayed, A., & Foster, L. J. (2015) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00589 · Cited by 21
High‐throughput parallel proteogenomics: A bacterial case study
Chapman, B., & Bellgard, M. (2014) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201400185 · Cited by 21
The discovery of novel protein-coding features in mouse genome based on mass spectrometry data
Xing, X.-B., Li, Q., Sun, H., Fu, X., Zhan, F., Huang, X., Li, J., Chen, C.-L., Shyr, Y., Zeng, R., et al. (2011) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.07.005 · Cited by 21
Fu, S., Liu, X., Luo, M., Xie, K., Nice, E. C., Zhang, H., & Huang, C. (2017) · Expert Review of Proteomics · doi:10.1080/14789450.2017.1299006 · Cited by 22
Alternative splicing shapes transcriptome but not proteome diversity in Physcomitrella patens
Fesenko, I. A., Khazigaleeva, R., Kirov, I. V., Kniazev, A., Glushenko, O. E., Babalyan, K., Arapidi, G. P., Shashkova, T., Butenko, I., Zgoda, V. G., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02970-z · Cited by 19
Bao, Y., Liang, Z., Mayfield, J. A., Lee, S. W., Ploplis, V. A., & Castellino, F. (2015) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00511-15 · Cited by 20
Reconciling proteomics with next generation sequencing
Low, T. Y., & Heck, A. J. R. (2015) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.10.023 · Cited by 19
Advances in Proteomics Allow Insights Into Neuronal Proteomes
Fingleton, E., Li, Y., & Roche, K. W. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2021.647451 · Cited by 17
In-depth characterisation of the lamb meat proteome from longissimus lumborum
Yu, T., Morton, J. D., Clerens, S., & Dyer, J. M. (2015) · EuPA Open Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.euprot.2015.01.001 · Cited by 17
Yu, X., Wang, Y., Kohnen, M. V., Piao, M., Tu, M., Gao, Y., Lin, C., Zuo, Z., & Gu, L. (2019) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells8070744 · Cited by 16
Zhang, J., Yang, M., Zeng, H., & Ge, F. (2016) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m116.060046 · Cited by 14
Pseudogene Redux with New Biological Significance
Salmena, L. (2014) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0835-6_1 · Cited by 14
Developing Well-Annotated Species-Specific Protein Databases Using Comparative Proteogenomics
Dupree, E. J., Crimmins, B. S., Holsen, T. M., & Darie, C. C. (2019) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15950-4_22 · Cited by 12
Pseudogenes and Liquid Phase Separation in Epigenetic Expression
Nsengimana, B., Khan, F. A., Awan, U. A., Wang, D., Fang, N., Wei, W., Zhang, W., & Ji, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.912282 · Cited by 11
Pseudogenes: Four Decades of Discovery
Salmena, L. (2021) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1503-4_1 · Cited by 13
Proteomics Applications in Dental Derived Stem Cells
Li, J., Tian, W., & Song, J. (2017) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.25667 · Cited by 11
Devising a Consensus Framework for Validation of Novel Human Coding Loci
Bruford, E. A., Lane, L., & Harrow, J. (2015) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00688 · Cited by 10
Self-citationCook, T. W., Wilstermann, A. M., Mitchell, J. T., Arnold, N. E., Rajasekaran, S., Bupp, C. P., & Prokop, J. W. (2023) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom13020257 · Cited by 12
Gauging the trends of pseudogenes in plants
Garewal, N., Goyal, N., Pathania, S., Kaur, J., & Singh, K. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2021.1901648 · Cited by 10
Proteogenomic Tools and Approaches to Explore Protein Coding Landscapes of Eukaryotic Genomes
Kumar, D., & Dash, D. (2016) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42316-6_1 · Cited by 10
Discovering the N-Terminal Methylome by Repurposing of Proteomic Datasets
Chen, P., Sobreira, T. J. P., Hall, M. C., & Hazbun, T. R. (2021) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00009 · Cited by 9
Proteogenomic Methods to Improve Genome Annotation
Datta, K. K., Madugundu, A. K., & Gowda, H. (2016) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3524-6_5 · Cited by 9
Proteogenomic Analysis of Trichophyton rubrum Aided by RNA Sequencing
Xu, X., Liu, T., Ren, X., Liu, B., Yang, J., Chen, L., Wei, C., Zheng, J., Dong, J., Sun, L., et al. (2015) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00009 · Cited by 9
A tool for integrating genetic and mass spectrometry‐based peptide data: Proteogenomics Viewer
Kroll, J. E., da Silva, V. L., SOUZA, S. J. D., & de Souza, G. A. (2017) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201700015 · Cited by 11
Proteomics Techniques for the Detection of Translated Pseudogenes
Ucciferri, N., & Rocchiccioli, S. (2014) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0835-6_12 · Cited by 8
The shrinking human protein coding complement: are there now fewer than 20,000 genes?Preprint
Ezkurdia, I., Juan, D., Rodrı́guez, J. M., Frankish, A., Diekhans, M., Harrow, J., Vázquez, J., Valencia, A., & Tress, M. L. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.7111 · Cited by 8
Self-citationTran, T. T., Bollineni, R. C., Strozynski, M., Koehler, C. J., & Thiede, B. (2017) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00126 · Cited by 7
Proteoforms: Methods of Analysis and Clinical Prospects
Kiseleva, O. I., Лисица, А. В., & Poverennaya, E. V. (2018) · Molecular Biology · doi:10.1134/s0026893318030068 · Cited by 6
Identification of potential pseudogenes for predicting the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma
Ge, L., Jin, T., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Hu, X., Zhang, W., Song, F., & Huang, P. C. (2023) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s00432-023-05241-9 · Cited by 7
Kroll, J. E., SOUZA, S. J. D., & de Souza, G. A. (2014) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.673 · Cited by 6
McAfee, A., & Foster, L. J. (2016) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2016.09.020 · Cited by 5
Rusk, N. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth0611-448b · Cited by 4
Bozorgmehr, J. H. (2024) · Molecular Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1007/s00438-023-02090-6 · Cited by 4
Marx, H. (2000) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2022.003.0012 · Cited by 4
From Genomic Fossils to Functional Elements: The Evolving Story of Pseudogenes
Sun, M., Ma, Y., & Yu, J. (2025) · Advanced Genetics · doi:10.1002/ggn2.202500040 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Brosch, M., Saunders, G. I., Frankish, A., Collins, M. O., Yu, L., Wright, J., Verstraten, R., Adams, D. J., Harrow, J., Choudhary, J. S., & Hubbard, T.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2011-04-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 756-767
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3083093
- OpenAlex
- W1997509288
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Genome Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (077198)
- Cancer Research UK (13031)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- shotgun proteomics, peptide-spectrum matching, novel protein-coding genes, alternative splicing, processed pseudogenes, gene validation, insulin-like growth factor II, genome annotation pipeline
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Genes, Peptides, Pseudogenes, Genome, Alternative Splicing, Genomics, Proteomics, Mice, Tandem Mass Spectrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
