Cited by 132Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenomics and Rare DiseasesBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Genotype to phenotype via network analysis

Open access
Carter, Hannah, Hofree, Matan, Ideker, Trey·2013·Current Opinion in Genetics & Development

Abstract

A prime objective of genomic medicine is the identification of disease-causing mutations and the mechanisms by which such events result in disease. As most disease phenotypes arise not from single genes and proteins but from a complex network of molecular interactions, a priori knowledge about the molecular network serves as a framework for biological inference and data mining. Here we review recent developments at the interface of biological networks and mutation analysis. We examine how mutations may be treated as a perturbation of the molecular interaction network and what insights may be gained from taking this perspective. We review work that aims to transform static networks into rich context-dependent networks and recent attempts to integrate non-coding RNAs into such analysis. Finally, we conclude with an overview of the many challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gde.2013.10.003

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many biological networks have a hierarchical structure in which nodes can be organized into a relatively small collection of highly interconnected modules.

    “Many biological networks have a hierarchical structure such that their nodes can be organized into a relatively small collection of highly interconnected modules4,28,29”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carter, H., Hofree, M., & Ideker, T.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Ideker, Trey
Venue
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
611-621
ISSN
0959-437X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993702356
Cited by
132
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Genetics & Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH (P41 GM103504, P50 GM085764)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
genotype-phenotype correlation, pathogenic variants, molecular interaction networks, network perturbation, non-coding RNA, genomic medicine, data mining
MeSH terms
Genotype, Humans, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Phenotype, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Gene Regulatory Networks, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review