Cited by 1,658Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenomics and Rare Diseases

CNVnator: An approach to discover, genotype, and characterize typical and atypical CNVs from family and population genome sequencing

Open access
Abyzov, Alexej, Urban, Alexander E., Snyder, Michael, Gerstein, Mark·2011·Genome Research

Abstract

Copy number variation (CNV) in the genome is a complex phenomenon, and not completely understood. We have developed a method, CNVnator, for CNV discovery and genotyping from read-depth (RD) analysis of personal genome sequencing. Our method is based on combining the established mean-shift approach with additional refinements (multiple-bandwidth partitioning and GC correction) to broaden the range of discovered CNVs. We calibrated CNVnator using the extensive validation performed by the 1000 Genomes Project. Because of this, we could use CNVnator for CNV discovery and genotyping in a population and characterization of atypical CNVs, such as de novo and multi-allelic events. Overall, for CNVs accessible by RD, CNVnator has high sensitivity (86%–96%), low false-discovery rate (3%–20%), high genotyping accuracy (93%–95%), and high resolution in breakpoint discovery (<200 bp in 90% of cases with high sequencing coverage). Furthermore, CNVnator is complementary in a straightforward way to split-read and read-pair approaches: It misses CNVs created by retrotransposable elements, but more than half of the validated CNVs that it identifies are not detected by split-read or read-pair. By genotyping CNVs in the CEPH, Yoruba, and Chinese-Japanese populations, we estimated that at least 11% of all CNV loci involve complex, multi-allelic events, a considerably higher estimate than reported earlier. Moreover, among these events, we observed cases with allele distribution strongly deviating from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, possibly implying selection on certain complex loci. Finally, by combining discovery and genotyping, we identified six potential de novo CNVs in two family trios.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.114876.110

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Copy-number effects were addressed by deriving copy-number profiles from input sequencing, excluding regions with a strong deletion (<0.25) in any sample, and normalizing by copy number.

    “To control for copy number changes, we first called copy number profiles from input sequencing data using CNVnator37. We then removed all regions where at least one sample had a strong deletion (<0.25), and normalized by copy number.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fereydoun Hormozdiari, Can Alkan, Mario Ventura, et al. Alu repeat discovery and characterization within human genomes https://genome.cshlp.org/subscriptions go to: Genome Research To subscribe to References http://genome.cshlp.org/content/21/6/974.full.html#related-urls Articles cited in: http://genome.cshlp.org/content/21/6/974.full.html#ref-list-1 This article cites 29 articles, 8 of which can be accessed free at: License Service Email Alerting click here. top right corner of the article or Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article -sign up in the box at the https://genome.cshlp.org/subscriptions go to: Genome Research To subscribe to · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abyzov, A., Urban, A. E., Snyder, M., & Gerstein, M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2011-02-07
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
974-984
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150506261
Cited by
1,658
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 132 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 148 · 2021: 180 · 2020: 172 · 2019: 141 · 2018: 136 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 38
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10rr019895-01)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 19895, S10_RR019895)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
copy number variation, mean shift, de novo CNVs, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, natural selection, family trios, population genomics, 1000 Genomes Project
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Base Composition, Ethnicity, Genotype, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity, Software, Genome, Human, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Metagenomics, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review