The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A genome-wide perspective on the evolutionary history of enigmatic wolf-like canids
Open accessAbstract
High-throughput genotyping technologies developed for model species can potentially increase the resolution of demographic history and ancestry in wild relatives. We use a SNP genotyping microarray developed for the domestic dog to assay variation in over 48K loci in wolf-like species worldwide. Despite the high mobility of these large carnivores, we find distinct hierarchical population units within gray wolves and coyotes that correspond with geographic and ecologic differences among populations. Further, we test controversial theories about the ancestry of the Great Lakes wolf and red wolf using an analysis of haplotype blocks across all 38 canid autosomes. We find that these enigmatic canids are highly admixed varieties derived from gray wolves and coyotes, respectively. This divergent genomic history suggests that they do not have a shared recent ancestry as proposed by previous researchers. Interspecific hybridization, as well as the process of evolutionary divergence, may be responsible for the observed phenotypic distinction of both forms. Such admixture complicates decisions regarding endangered species restoration and protection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.
Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M. A. R., Bender, D., Maller, J., Sklar, P., de Bakker, P. I. W., Daly, M. J., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/519795 · Cited by 34,089
Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · Cited by 33,908
Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study
EVANNO, G., REGNAUT, S., & GOUDET, J. (2005) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02553.x · Cited by 21,895
ESTIMATING F -STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE
Weir, B. S., & Cockerham, C. C. (1984) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x · Cited by 19,066
Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis
Excoffier, L., Laval, G., & Schneider, S. (2005) · Evolutionary Bioinformatics · doi:10.1177/117693430500100003 · Cited by 14,280
Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies
Price, A. L., Patterson, N. J., Plenge, R. M., Weinblatt, M. E., Shadick, N. A., & Reich, D. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1847 · Cited by 10,248
Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation
HEWITT, G. (1996) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1006/bijl.1996.0035 · Cited by 4,106
Barton, N. H., & Hewitt, G. M. (1985) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.000553 · Cited by 2,882
Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog
members, B. S. P., Lindblad-Toh, K., Wade, C. M., Mikkelsen, T. S., Karlsson, E. K., Jaffe, D. B., Kamal, M., Clamp, M., Chang, J. L., Kulbokas, E. J., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04338 · Cited by 2,568
Self-citationGenetic Structure of Human Populations
Rosenberg, N. A., Pritchard, J. K., Weber, J. L., Cann, H. M., Kidd, K. K., Zhivotovsky, L. A., & Feldman, M. W. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1078311 · Cited by 2,222
Cited by
Natural selection interacts with recombination to shape the evolution of hybrid genomes
Schumer, M., Xu, C., Powell, D. L., Durvasula, A., Skov, L., Holland, C., Blazier, J. C., Sankararaman, S., Andolfatto, P., Rosenthal, G. G., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar3684 · Cited by 412
HOW COMMON IS HOMOPLOID HYBRID SPECIATION?: PERSPECTIVE
Schumer, M., Rosenthal, G. G., & Andolfatto, P. (2014) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12399 · Cited by 360
Miller, W., Schuster, S. C., Welch, A. J., Ratan, A., Bedoya-Reina, O. C., Zhao, F., Kim, H. L., Burhans, R. C., Drautz, D. I., Wittekindt, N. E., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1210506109 · Cited by 353
Conservation of biodiversity in the genomics era
Supple, M. A., & Shapiro, B. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1520-3 · Cited by 334
The genomics of selection in dogs and the parallel evolution between dogs and humans
Wang, G.-D., Zhai, W., Yang, H.-C., Fan, R.-X., Cao, X., Zhong, L., Wang, L., Liu, F., Wu, H., Cheng, L.-G., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2814 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- vonHoldt, B. M., Pollinger, J. P., Earl, D. A., Knowles, J. C., Boyko, A. R., Parker, H., Geffen, E., Pilot, M., Jedrzejewski, W., Jedrzejewska, B., Sidorovich, V., Greco, C., Randi, E., Musiani, M., Kays, R., Bustamante, C. D., Ostrander, E. A., Novembre, J., & Wayne, R. K.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2011-05-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1294-1305
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098264076
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 88
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A genome-wide perspective on the evolutionary history of enigmatic wolf-like canids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.116301.110
- The paper
- vonHoldt, B. M., Pollinger, J. P., Earl, D. A., Knowles, J. C., Boyko, A. R., Parker, H., Geffen, E., Pilot, M., Jedrzejewski, W., Jedrzejewska, B., Sidorovich, V., Greco, C., Randi, E., Musiani, M., Kays, R., Bustamante, C. D., Ostrander, E. A., Novembre, J., & Wayne, R. K. (2011). A genome-wide perspective on the evolutionary history of enigmatic wolf-like canids. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.116301.110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
