Cited by 2,222

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Genetic Structure of Human Populations

Rosenberg, Noah A., Pritchard, Jonathan K., Weber, James L., Cann, Howard M., Kidd, Kenneth K., Zhivotovsky, Lev A., Feldman, Marcus W.·2002·Science

Abstract

We studied human population structure using genotypes at 377 autosomal microsatellite loci in 1056 individuals from 52 populations. Within-population differences among individuals account for 93 to 95% of genetic variation; differences among major groups constitute only 3 to 5%. Nevertheless, without using prior information about the origins of individuals, we identified six main genetic clusters, five of which correspond to major geographic regions, and subclusters that often correspond to individual populations. General agreement of genetic and predefined populations suggests that self-reported ancestry can facilitate assessments of epidemiological risks but does not obviate the need to use genetic information in genetic association studies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1078311

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1101/gr.99202 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.296.5566.261b · DOI
  3. Lewontin R. C., Evol. Biol. 6, 381 (1972).
  4. 10.1086/283624 · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4516 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1086/302825 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/1520-6505(2001)10:1<34::AID-EVAN1011>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
  8. 10.1101/gr.214902 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/368455a0 · DOI
  10. 10.1086/515510 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · DOI
  12. 10.1086/339929 · DOI
  13. J. Haywood The Penguin Historical Atlas of the Vikings (Penguin Books London 1995).
  14. 10.1093/genetics/159.2.699 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0065-2660(01)42016-5 · DOI
  16. Rogers A. R., Jorde L. B., Am. J. Hum. Genet. 58, 1033 (1996).
  17. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025662 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/ng761 · DOI
  19. commentN. Risch E. Burchard E. Ziv H. Tang Genome Biol. 3 2007.1 (2002). · DOI
  20. Thomas D. C., Witte J. S., Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 11, 505 (2002).
  21. Wacholder S., Rothman N., Caporaso N., Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 11, 513 (2002).
  22. 10.1006/tpbi.2001.1543 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02781-6 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/hdy.1995.41 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200151 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rosenberg, N. A., Pritchard, J. K., Weber, J. L., Cann, H. M., Kidd, K. K., Zhivotovsky, L. A., & Feldman, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Molecular and Computational Biology, 1042 West 36th Place DRB 289, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
  • Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
  • Center for Medical Genetics, Marshfield Medical Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA.
  • Foundation Jean Dausset–Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain (CEPH), 27 rue Juliette Dodu, 75010 Paris, France.
  • Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
  • Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 3 Gubkin Street, Moscow 117809, Russia.
  • Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Venue
Science
Published
2002-12-20
Volume
298
Issue
5602
Pages
2381-2385
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
2,222
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review