Cited by 142Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Death of PRDM9 coincides with stabilization of the recombination landscape in the dog genome

Open access
Axelsson, Erik, Webster, Matthew T., Ratnakumar, Abhirami, The LUPA Consortium, Ponting, Chris P., Lindblad-Toh, Kerstin·2012·Genome Research

Abstract

Analysis of diverse eukaryotes has revealed that recombination events cluster in discrete genomic locations known as hotspots. In humans, a zinc-finger protein, PRDM9, is believed to initiate recombination in >40% of hotspots by binding to a specific DNA sequence motif. However, the PRDM9 coding sequence is disrupted in the dog genome assembly, raising questions regarding the nature and control of recombination in dogs. By analyzing the sequences of PRDM9 orthologs in a number of dog breeds and several carnivores, we show here that this gene was inactivated early in canid evolution. We next use patterns of linkage disequilibrium using more than 170,000 SNP markers typed in almost 500 dogs to estimate the recombination rates in the dog genome using a coalescent-based approach. Broad-scale recombination rates show good correspondence with an existing linkage-based map. Significant variation in recombination rate is observed on the fine scale, and we are able to detect over 4000 recombination hotspots with high confidence. In contrast to human hotspots, 40% of canine hotspots are characterized by a distinct peak in GC content. A comparative genomic analysis indicates that these peaks are present also as weaker peaks in the panda, suggesting that the hotspots have been continually reinforced by accelerated and strongly GC biased nucleotide substitutions, consistent with the long-term action of biased gene conversion on the dog lineage. These results are consistent with the loss of PRDM9 in canids, resulting in a greater evolutionary stability of recombination hotspots. The genetic determinants of recombination hotspots in the dog genome may thus reflect a fundamental process of relevance to diverse animal species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.124123.111

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Axelsson, E., Webster, M. T., Ratnakumar, A., The LUPA Consortium, Ponting, C. P., & Lindblad-Toh, K.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2011-10-17
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
51-63
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170301165
Cited by
142
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • European Science Foundation
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Medical Research Council
  • Uppsala Multidisciplinary Center for Advanced Computational Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
PRDM9, meiotic recombination, recombination hotspots, dog genome, gene inactivation, linkage disequilibrium, GC content, biased gene conversion, PANDAS, comparative genomics, zinc finger proteins
MeSH terms
Animals, Dogs, Humans, Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase, Recombination, Genetic, Genome, Evolution, Molecular, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, GC Rich Sequence, Genomic Instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review