Cited by 112Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Biased clustered substitutions in the human genome: The footprints of male-driven biased gene conversion

Open access
Dreszer, Timothy R., Wall, Gregory D., Haussler, David, Pollard, Katherine S.·2007·Genome Research

Abstract

We examined fixed substitutions in the human lineage since divergence from the common ancestor with the chimpanzee, and determined what fraction are AT to GC (weak-to-strong). Substitutions that are densely clustered on the chromosomes show a remarkable excess of weak-to-strong “biased” substitutions. These unexpected biased clustered substitutions (UBCS) are common near the telomeres of all autosomes but not the sex chromosomes. Regions of extreme bias are enriched for genes. Human and chimp orthologous regions show a striking similarity in the shape and magnitude of their respective UBCS maps, suggesting a relatively stable force leads to clustered bias. The strong and stable signal near telomeres may have participated in the evolution of isochores. One exception to the UBCS pattern found in all autosomes is chromosome 2, which shows a UBCS peak midchromosome, mapping to the fusion site of two ancestral chromosomes. This provides evidence that the fusion occurred as recently as 740,000 years ago and no more than ∼3 million years ago. No biased clustering was found in SNPs, suggesting that clusters of biased substitutions are selected from mutations. UBCS is strongly correlated with male (and not female) recombination rates, which explains the lack of UBCS signal on chromosome X. These observations support the hypothesis that biased gene conversion (BGC), specifically in the male germline, played a significant role in the evolution of the human genome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.6395807

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The HSA2 fusion formed approximately 0.9 Mya (95% CI 0.4-1.5 Mya), estimated by UBCS analysis comparing chimpanzee and modern human genomes.

    “By analyzing the enrichment of these substitutions around the fusion site of HSA2 we estimated its formation time at 0.9 Mya with a 95% confidence interval of 0.4-1.5 Mya.”

    From Revised time estimation of the ancestral human chromosome 2 fusion (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

    The ‘Dating the fusion of chromosome 2’ section confirms that the authors estimated the fusion date by comparing the human fusion-region UBCS peak with orthologous chimpanzee regions. But ‘Human chromosome 2 fusion retains bias’ reports 0.74 Mya with a 95% confidence interval of 0–2.81 Mya, not 0.9 Mya (0.4–1.5 Mya). (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ratio of UBCS between the p and q arms of any chromosome is not similar for human and chimpanzee, violating Dreszer et al.'s assumption.

    “This assumption is clearly violated in the data and therefore we have devised a different estimation procedure.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [18]18. Dreszer, T. 2006. "Biased clustered substitutions in the human genome: Sex, gambling and non-Darwinian evolution." M.S. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz. http://www.soe.ucsc.edu/ research/compbio/ubcs/Thesis.pdf
  2. [51]51. National Center for Biotechnology Information. 2002. NCBI handbook. National Library of Medicine (U.S.), National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD. http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=Books.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dreszer, T. R., Wall, G. D., Haussler, D., & Pollard, K. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2007-09-04
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
1420-1430
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143699138
Cited by
112
References
75
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
biased gene conversion, human-chimpanzee divergence, telomeres, isochores, recombination rate, male germline, sex chromosomes, orthologous regions, karyotype evolution, human genome evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Pan troglodytes, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2, Female, Gene Conversion, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Recombination, Genetic, Sex Characteristics, Species Specificity, Time Factors, Genome, Human, Telomere, Evolution, Molecular, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Chromosomes, Human, X, Chromosomes, Human, Y, Gene Fusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review