The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oxford Nanopore sequencing, hybrid error correction, and de novo assembly of a eukaryotic genome
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Monitoring the progress of DNA molecules through a membrane pore has been postulated as a method for sequencing DNA for several decades. Recently, a nanopore-based sequencing instrument, the Oxford Nanopore MinION, has become available, and we used this for sequencing the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. To make use of these data, we developed a novel open-source hybrid error correction algorithm Nanocorr specifically for Oxford Nanopore reads, because existing packages were incapable of assembling the long read lengths (5–50 kbp) at such high error rates (between ∼5% and 40% error). With this new method, we were able to perform a hybrid error correction of the nanopore reads using complementary MiSeq data and produce a de novo assembly that is highly contiguous and accurate: The contig N50 length is more than ten times greater than an Illumina-only assembly (678 kb versus 59.9 kbp) and has >99.88% consensus identity when compared to the reference. Furthermore, the assembly with the long nanopore reads presents a much more complete representation of the features of the genome and correctly assembles gene cassettes, rRNAs, transposable elements, and other genomic features that were almost entirely absent in the Illumina-only assembly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features
Quinlan, A. R., & Hall, I. M. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · Cited by 27,437
Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes
Kurtz, S., Phillippy, A., Delcher, A. L., Smoot, M., Shumway, M., Antonescu, C., & Salzberg, S. L. (2004) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12 · Cited by 5,254
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1038/nature13907 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nmeth.2474 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nnano.2009.12 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt0412-295 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13770 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.2280 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu555 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164359 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.74.2.560 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/2047-217X-3-22 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90196-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1310615110 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0901054106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nnano.2011.129 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1166/jnn.2013.7756 · DOI
Cited by
Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies
Goodwin, S., McPherson, J. D., & McCombie, W. R. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.49 · Cited by 4,352
Self-citationThe Oxford Nanopore MinION: delivery of nanopore sequencing to the genomics community
Jain, M., Olsen, H. E., Paten, B., & Akeson, M. (2016) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1103-0 · Cited by 1,588
Ashley, E. A. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.86 · Cited by 1,116
Chromosome-scale shotgun assembly using an in vitro method for long-range linkage
Putnam, N. H., O'Connell, B. L., Stites, J. C., Rice, B. J., Blanchette, M., Calef, R., Troll, C. J., Fields, A., Hartley, P. D., Sugnet, C. W., et al. (2016) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.193474.115 · Cited by 732
Piercing the dark matter: bioinformatics of long-range sequencing and mapping
Sedlazeck, F. J., Lee, H., Darby, C. A., & Schatz, M. C. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0003-4 · Cited by 530
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodwin, S., Gurtowski, J., Ethe-Sayers, S., Deshpande, P., Schatz, M. C., & McCombie, W. R.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2015-10-07
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1750-1756
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5469
- OpenAlex
- W2189047836
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DBI-1350041, IOS-1032105)
- National Institutes of Health (R01-HG006677)
- Cancer Center Support (CA045508)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.