Cited by 155

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Single-cell analysis of human embryos reveals diverse patterns of aneuploidy and mosaicism

Starostik, Margaret R., Sosina, Olukayode A., McCoy, Rajiv C.·2020·Genome Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Less than half of human zygotes survive to birth, primarily due to aneuploidies of meiotic or mitotic origin. Mitotic errors generate chromosomal mosaicism, defined by multiple cell lineages with distinct chromosome complements. The incidence and impacts of mosaicism in human embryos remain controversial, with most previous studies based on bulk DNA assays or comparisons of multiple biopsies of few embryonic cells. Single-cell genomic data provide an opportunity to quantify mosaicism on an embryo-wide scale. To this end, we extended an approach to infer aneuploidies based on dosage-associated changes in gene expression by integrating signatures of allelic imbalance. We applied this method to published single-cell RNA sequencing data from 74 human embryos, spanning the morula to blastocyst stages. Our analysis revealed widespread mosaic aneuploidies, with 59 of 74 (80%) embryos harboring at least one putative aneuploid cell (1% FDR). By clustering copy number calls, we reconstructed histories of chromosome segregation, inferring that 55 (74%) embryos possessed mitotic aneuploidies and 23 (31%) embryos possessed meiotic aneuploidies. We found no significant enrichment of aneuploid cells in the trophectoderm compared to the inner cell mass, although we do detect such enrichment in data from later postimplantation stages. Finally, we observed that aneuploid cells up-regulate immune response genes and down-regulate genes involved in proliferation, metabolism, and protein processing, consistent with stress responses documented in other stages and systems. Together, our work provides a high-resolution view of aneuploidy in preimplantation embryos, and supports the conclusion that low-level mosaicism is a common feature of early human development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.262774.120

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bogomolov M , Peterson CB , Benjamini Y , Sabatti C . 2017. Testing hypotheses on a tree: new error rates and controlling strategies. arXiv :1705.07529v2 [stat.ME]. · arXiv
  3. 10.1038/ncomms11165 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/humrep/dew250 · DOI
  5. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008414 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.06.012 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s00441-015-2305-6 · DOI
  8. 10.1101/gr.239830.118 · DOI
  9. 10.1101/gr.200527.115 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-139 · DOI
  12. 10.1101/gr.228080.117 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.tig.2005.02.012 · DOI
  14. 10.1186/s12958-017-0251-8 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/humrep/deg060 · DOI
  16. 10.1056/NEJMc1500421 · DOI
  17. 10.1186/s12864-017-4253-x · DOI
  18. 10.1101/gr.252981.119 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/35066065 · DOI
  20. 10.1242/dev.145318 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/s41598-018-20614-8 · DOI
  22. 10.1101/060012 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s10815-017-1060-x · DOI
  24. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1038/s41598-018-33279-0 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/sigtrans.2017.23 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1038/s41586-018-0321-x · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1038/nmeth.3370 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.tig.2017.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1126/science.aaa3337 · DOI
  31. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005601 · DOI
  32. 10.1101/gr.107524.110 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1093/humrep/dez242 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.10.007 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/ng.3306 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/s41598-017-09693-1 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.023 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.002 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.01.023 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.05.022 · DOI
  41. 10.1073/pnas.1209227109 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/stem.1509 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/nmeth.4612 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1242/dev.169672 · DOI
  45. 10.1371/journal.pone.0195905 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/s41586-019-1187-2 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/humrep/dex286 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/nm.1924 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1530/REP-17-0569 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/ncomms8601 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/s41598-019-39111-7 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/s41591-019-0620-2 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/s41586-019-1500-0 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/s41588-017-0007-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 155

Metadata

Authors
Starostik, M. R., Sosina, O. A., & McCoy, R. C.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2020-06
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
814-825
ISSN
  • 1088-9051
  • 1549-5469
Cited by
155
References
8
Language
en
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R35GM133747)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review