Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Highly multiplexed molecular inversion probe genotyping: Over 10,000 targeted SNPs genotyped in a single tube assay

Open access
Hardenbol, Paul, Yu, Fuli, Belmont, John, MacKenzie, Jennifer, Bruckner, Carsten, Brundage, Tiffany, Boudreau, Andrew, Chow, Steve, Eberle, Jim, Erbilgin, Ayca, Falkowski, Mat, Fitzgerald, Ron, Ghose, Sy, Iartchouk, Oleg, Jain, Maneesh, Karlin-Neumann, George, Lu, Xiuhua, Miao, Xin, Moore, Bridget, Moorhead, Martin, Namsaraev, Eugeni, Pasternak, Shiran, Prakash, Eunice, Tran, Karen, Wang, Zhiyong, Jones, Hywel B., Davis, Ronald W., Willis, Thomas D., Gibbs, Richard A.·2005·Genome Research

Abstract

Large-scale genetic studies are highly dependent on efficient and scalable multiplex SNP assays. In this study, we report the development of Molecular Inversion Probe technology with four-color, single array detection, applied to large-scale genotyping of up to 12,000 SNPs per reaction. While generating 38,429 SNP assays using this technology in a population of 30 trios from the Centre d'Etude Polymorphisme Humain family panel as part of the International HapMap project, we established SNP conversion rates of ∼90% with concordance rates >99.6% and completeness levels >98% for assays multiplexed up to 12,000plex levels. Furthermore, these individual metrics can be “traded off” and, by sacrificing a small fraction of the conversion rate, the accuracy can be increased to very high levels. No loss of performance is seen when scaling from 6,000plex to 12,000plex assays, strongly validating the ability of the technology to suppress cross-reactivity at high multiplex levels. The results of this study demonstrate the suitability of this technology for comprehensive association studies that use targeted SNPs in indirect linkage disequilibrium studies or that directly screen for causative mutations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.3185605

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Hardenbol, P., Yu, F., Belmont, J., MacKenzie, J., Bruckner, C., Brundage, T., Boudreau, A., Chow, S., Eberle, J., Erbilgin, A., Falkowski, M., Fitzgerald, R., Ghose, S., Iartchouk, O., Jain, M., Karlin-Neumann, G., Lu, X., Miao, X., Moore, B., Moorhead, M., Namsaraev, E., Pasternak, S., Prakash, E., Tran, K., Wang, Z., Jones, H. B., Davis, R. W., Willis, T. D., & Gibbs, R. A.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2005-02
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
269-275
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149615023
Cited by
308
References
3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly multiplexed molecular inversion probe genotyping: Over 10,000 targeted SNPs genotyped in a single tube assay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.3185605
The paper
Hardenbol, P., Yu, F., Belmont, J., MacKenzie, J., Bruckner, C., Brundage, T., Boudreau, A., Chow, S., Eberle, J., Erbilgin, A., Falkowski, M., Fitzgerald, R., Ghose, S., Iartchouk, O., Jain, M., Karlin-Neumann, G., Lu, X., Miao, X., Moore, B., . . . Gibbs, R. A. (2005). Highly multiplexed molecular inversion probe genotyping: Over 10,000 targeted SNPs genotyped in a single tube assay. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.3185605

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.