Cited by 589RNA Research and SplicingCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

RBM20, a gene for hereditary cardiomyopathy, regulates titin splicing

Open access
Guo, Wei, Schafer, Sebastian, Greaser, Marion L, Radke, Michael H, Liss, Martin, Govindarajan, Thirupugal, Maatz, Henrike, Schulz, Herbert +20 more·2012·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Alternative splicing has a major role in cardiac adaptive responses, as exemplified by the isoform switch of the sarcomeric protein titin, which adjusts ventricular filling. By positional cloning using a previously characterized rat strain with altered titin mRNA splicing, we identified a loss-of-function mutation in the gene encoding RNA binding motif protein 20 (Rbm20) as the underlying cause of pathological titin isoform expression. The phenotype of Rbm20-deficient rats resembled the pathology seen in individuals with dilated cardiomyopathy caused by RBM20 mutations. Deep sequencing of the human and rat cardiac transcriptome revealed an RBM20-dependent regulation of alternative splicing. In addition to titin (TTN), we identified a set of 30 genes with conserved splicing regulation between humans and rats. This network is enriched for genes that have previously been linked to cardiomyopathy, ion homeostasis and sarcomere biology. Our studies emphasize the key role of post-transcriptional regulation in cardiac function and provide mechanistic insights into the pathogenesis of human heart failure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nm.2693

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SORBS1 and MAP4K4 had multiple noncanonical isoforms that were detectable across multiple tissues, whereas titin had the most isoforms identified.

    “A number of proteins including SORBS1 and MAP4K4 had multiple noncanonical isoforms that were detectable across multiple tissues, whereas the protein with the most isoforms identified was titin (Figure 3A), which is also the largest protein in the human genome with the most exons and whose splicing has been widely implicated in congenital heart diseases (Guo et al., 2012; Herman et al., 2012).”

    From Splice-Junction-Based Mapping of Alternative Isoforms in the Human Proteome (2019) · cites this paper as Guo et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, W., Schafer, S., Greaser, M. L., Radke, M. H., Liss, M., Govindarajan, T., Maatz, H., Schulz, H., Li, S., Parrish, A. M., Dauksaite, V., Vakeel, P., Klaassen, S., Gerull, B., Thierfelder, L., Regitz-Zagrosek, V., Hacker, T. A., Saupe, K. W., Dec, G. W., Ellinor, P. T., MacRae, C. A., Spallek, B., Fischer, R., Perrot, A., Özcelik, C., Saar, K., Hubner, N., & Gotthardt, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Max Delbrück Center (DE)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Gotthardt, Michael
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2012-04-01
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
766-773
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2059060273
Cited by
589
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 11
FWCI
11.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL77196, R01HL077196, HL075431, R01HL075431)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
RBM20, titin, alternative splicing, dilated cardiomyopathy, familial cardiomyopathy, splicing factors, titin isoforms, sarcomere, cardiac transcriptome, post-transcriptional regulation, heart failure, positional cloning, ion homeostasis
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Cardiomyopathy, Dilated, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Muscle Proteins, Mutation, Protein Kinases, Rats, Inbred BN, Rats, Inbred F344, RNA Splicing, RNA-Binding Proteins, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Rats, LIM Domain Proteins, Connectin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review