Cited by 616Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structureGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Calibrating a coalescent simulation of human genome sequence variation

Open access
Schaffner, Stephen F., Foo, Catherine, Gabriel, Stacey, Reich, David, Daly, Mark J., Altshuler, David·2005·Genome Research

Abstract

Population genetic models play an important role in human genetic research, connecting empirical observations about sequence variation with hypotheses about underlying historical and biological causes. More specifically, models are used to compare empirical measures of sequence variation, linkage disequilibrium (LD), and selection to expectations under a “null” distribution. In the absence of detailed information about human demographic history, and about variation in mutation and recombination rates, simulations have of necessity used arbitrary models, usually simple ones. With the advent of large empirical data sets, it is now possible to calibrate population genetic models with genome-wide data, permitting for the first time the generation of data that are consistent with empirical data across a wide range of characteristics. We present here the first such calibrated model and show that, while still arbitrary, it successfully generates simulated data (for three populations) that closely resemble empirical data in allele frequency, linkage disequilibrium, and population differentiation. No assertion is made about the accuracy of the proposed historical and recombination model, but its ability to generate realistic data meets a long-standing need among geneticists. We anticipate that this model, for which software is publicly available, and others like it will have numerous applications in empirical studies of human genetics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.3709305

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The initial stages of European skin lightening occurred in a proto-Eurasian population approximately 30,000 years ago, after the out-of-Africa migration 60,000-70,000 years ago and slightly more recently than the earliest archaeological evidence for anatomically modern humans in Europe approximately 40,000 years ago.

    “Our results based on the KITLG gene suggest that the initial stages of European skin lightening occurred in a proto-Eurasian population, approximately 30,000 years ago”

    From The timing of pigmentation lightening in Europeans (2013) · cites this paper as Schaffner et al. 2005

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The demographic model most compatible with the data for European and East Asian populations is a bottleneck scenario, with stronger genetic drift in East Asian populations than European populations.

    “Recent studies have shown that the demographic model most compatible with the data for European and East Asian populations is a bottleneck scenario, with stronger genetic drift in East Asian populations than European populations (Schaffner et al. 2005;Voight et al. 2005).”

    From The timing of pigmentation lightening in Europeans (2013) · cites this paper as Schaffner et al. 2005

    The Discussion’s Table 1 gives the best-fitting simulation a stronger Asian bottleneck (F = 0.067) than European bottleneck (F = 0.020), consistent with greater drift in the Asian lineage. But the Discussion says many other models could fit acceptably and cautions that its parameters are not inferences about real-world history. It therefore does not establish a bottleneck scenario as the uniquely most compatible demographic history. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]29. Walsh, E.C., Sabeti, P., Hutcheson, H., Fry, B., Schaffner, S.F., de Bakker, P.I.W., Varilly, P., Roy, J., Cooper, R., Zeng, Y., et al. 2005. Large-scale survey of variation and signals of selection in 168 immunological genes. Human Genetics (in press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schaffner, S. F., Foo, C., Gabriel, S., Reich, D., Daly, M. J., & Altshuler, D.
Affiliations
Broad Institute (US)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2005-10-26
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
1576-1583
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161644980
Cited by
616
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 44
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Broad Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
coalescent simulation, model calibration, linkage disequilibrium, allele frequency, genetic differentiation, recombination rate, mutation rate, human demographic history, population genetic models, simulated data
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Gene Frequency, Genetics, Population, Humans, Models, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Linkage Disequilibrium, Genome, Human, Evolution, Molecular, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review