Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 523

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental validation of the regulated expression of large numbers of non-coding RNAs from the mouse genome

Open access
Ravasi, Timothy, Suzuki, Harukazu, Pang, Ken C., Katayama, Shintaro, Furuno, Masaaki, Okunishi, Rie, Fukuda, Shiro, Ru, Kelin, Frith, Martin C., Gongora, M. Milena, Grimmond, Sean M., Hume, David A., Hayashizaki, Yoshihide, Mattick, John S.·2006·Genome Research

Abstract

Recent large-scale analyses of mainly full-length cDNA libraries generated from a variety of mouse tissues indicated that almost half of all representative cloned sequences did not contain an apparent protein-coding sequence, and were putatively derived from non-protein-coding RNA (ncRNA) genes. However, many of these clones were singletons and the majority were unspliced, raising the possibility that they may be derived from genomic DNA or unprocessed pre-mRNA contamination during library construction, or alternatively represent nonspecific “transcriptional noise.” Here we show, using reverse transcriptase-dependent PCR, microarray, and Northern blot analyses, that many of these clones were derived from genuine transcripts of unknown function whose expression appears to be regulated. The ncRNA transcripts have larger exons and fewer introns than protein-coding transcripts. Analysis of the genomic landscape around these sequences indicates that some cDNA clones were produced not from terminal poly(A) tracts but internal priming sites within longer transcripts, only a minority of which is encompassed by known genes. A significant proportion of these transcripts exhibit tissue-specific expression patterns, as well as dynamic changes in their expression in macrophages following lipopolysaccharide stimulation. Taken together, the data provide strong support for the conclusion that ncRNAs are an important, regulated component of the mammalian transcriptome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.4200206

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 523

Metadata

Authors
Ravasi, T., Suzuki, H., Pang, K. C., Katayama, S., Furuno, M., Okunishi, R., Fukuda, S., Ru, K., Frith, M. C., Gongora, M. M., Grimmond, S. M., Hume, D. A., Hayashizaki, Y., & Mattick, J. S.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2005-12-12
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
11-19
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105714972
Cited by
523
References
5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental validation of the regulated expression of large numbers of non-coding RNAs from the mouse genome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.4200206
The paper
Ravasi, T., Suzuki, H., Pang, K. C., Katayama, S., Furuno, M., Okunishi, R., Fukuda, S., Ru, K., Frith, M. C., Gongora, M. M., Grimmond, S. M., Hume, D. A., Hayashizaki, Y., & Mattick, J. S. (2006). Experimental validation of the regulated expression of large numbers of non-coding RNAs from the mouse genome. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.4200206

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.