The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly efficient concerted evolution in the ribosomal DNA repeats: Total rDNA repeat variation revealed by whole-genome shotgun sequence data
Open accessAbstract
Repeat families within genomes are often maintained with similar sequences. Traditionally, this has been explained by concerted evolution, where repeats in an array evolve “in concert” with the same sequence via continual turnover of repeats by recombination. Another form of evolution, birth-and-death evolution, can also explain this pattern, although in this case selection is the critical force maintaining the repeats. The level of intragenomic variation is the key difference between these two forms of evolution. The prohibitive size and repetitive nature of large repeat arrays have made determination of the absolute level of intragenomic repeat variability difficult, thus there is little evidence to support concerted evolution over birth-and-death evolution for many large repeat arrays. Here we use whole-genome shotgun sequence data from the genome projects of five fungal species to reveal absolute levels of sequence variation within the ribosomal RNA gene repeats (rDNA). The level of sequence variation is remarkably low. Furthermore, the polymorphisms that are detected are not functionally constrained and seem to exist beneath the level of selection. These results suggest the rDNA is evolving via concerted evolution. Comparisons with a repeat array undergoing birth-and-death evolution provide a clear contrast in the level of repeat array variation between these two forms of evolution, confirming that the rDNA indeed does evolve via concerted evolution. These low levels of intra-genomic variation are consistent with a model of concerted evolution in which homogenization is very rapid and efficiently maintains highly similar repeat arrays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ritossa, F. M., Atwood, K. C., & Spiegelman, S. (1966) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/54.3.819 · Cited by 296
Evolution of Drug Resistance in Experimental Populations of Candida albicans
Cowen, L. E., Sanglard, D., Calabrese, D., Sirjusingh, C., Anderson, J. B., & Kohn, L. M. (2000) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.182.6.1515-1522.2000 · Cited by 207
Cited by
Ribosomal RNA gene repeats, their stability and cellular senescence
KOBAYASHI, T. (2014) · Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B · doi:10.2183/pjab.90.119 · Cited by 167
Self-citationZhou, J., & Eickbush, T. H. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000386 · Cited by 30
Repression of interrupted and intact rDNA by the SUMO pathway in drosophila melanogaster
Luo, Y., Fefelova, E., Ninova, M., Chen, Y.-C. A., & Aravin, A. A. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.52416 · Cited by 19
Structure and evolution of the filaggrin gene repeated region in primates
Romero, V., Hosomichi, K., Nakaoka, H., Shibata, H., & Inoue, I. (2017) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0851-5 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Ganley, A. R. D., & Kobayashi, T.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2007-01-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 184-191
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133371208
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly efficient concerted evolution in the ribosomal DNA repeats: Total rDNA repeat variation revealed by whole-genome shotgun sequence data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.5457707
- The paper
- Ganley, A. R. D., & Kobayashi, T. (2007). Highly efficient concerted evolution in the ribosomal DNA repeats: Total rDNA repeat variation revealed by whole-genome shotgun sequence data. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.5457707
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.