Cited by 30Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

The pattern of R2 retrotransposon activity in natural populations of drosophila simulans reflects the dynamic nature of the rDNA locus

Open access
Zhou, Jun, Eickbush, Thomas H.·2009·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

The pattern and frequency of insertions that enable transposable elements to remain active in a population are poorly understood. The retrotransposable element R2 exclusively inserts into the 28S rRNA genes where it establishes long-term, stable relationships with its animal hosts. Previous studies with laboratory stocks of Drosophila simulans have suggested that control over R2 retrotransposition resides within the rDNA loci. In this report, we sampled 180 rDNA loci of animals collected from two natural populations of D. simulans. The two populations were found to have similar patterns of R2 activity. About half of the rDNA loci supported no or very low levels of R2 transcripts with no evidence of R2 retrotransposition. The remaining half of the rDNA loci had levels of R2 transcripts that varied in a continuous manner over almost a 100-fold range and did support new retrotransposition events. Structural analysis of the rDNA loci in 18 lines that spanned the range of R2 transcript levels in these populations revealed that R2 number and rDNA locus size varied 2-fold; however, R2 activity was not readily correlated with either of these parameters. Instead R2 activity was best correlated with the distribution of elements within the rDNA locus. Loci with no activity had larger contiguous blocks of rDNA units free of R2-insertions. These data suggest a model in which frequent recombination within the rDNA locus continually redistributes R2-inserted units resulting in changing levels of R2 activity within individual loci and persistent R2 activity within the population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000386

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analysis of the proportion and interposition of inserted and uninserted rRNA genes within clusters suggested a transcriptional domains model in which the region lacking R1/R2 insertions is selected to be active while the rest of the locus undergoes heterochromatinization.

    “An analysis of the proportion and interposition of inserted and uninserted rRNA genes within clusters suggested a ‘transcriptional domains’ model according to which the region of the rDNA cluster lacking R1/R2 insertions is selected to be transcriptionally active, while the rest of the locus undergoes heterochromatinization (40,65).”

    From Impaired function of rDNA transcription initiation machinery leads to derepression of ribosomal genes with insertions of R2 retrotransposon (2022) · cites this paper as [65]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, J., & Eickbush, T. H.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Eickbush, Thomas H.
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2009-02-20
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
e1000386
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2063124213
Cited by
30
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0544071)
  • National Institutes of Health (GM42790)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 42790, R01GM042790)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
R2 retrotransposon, Drosophila simulans, rDNA locus, retrotransposition, transposable elements, 28S rRNA gene, natural populations, recombination, retrotransposon activity
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Population Groups, DNA, Ribosomal, Drosophila, Female, Male, RNA, Ribosomal, 28S, Transcription, Genetic, Retroelements, Gene Dosage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review