The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systems biology approach for pathway level analysis
Open accessAbstract
A common challenge in the analysis of genomics data is trying to understand the underlying phenomenon in the context of all complex interactions taking place on various signaling pathways. A statistical approach using various models is universally used to identify the most relevant pathways in a given experiment. Here, we show that the existing pathway analysis methods fail to take into consideration important biological aspects and may provide incorrect results in certain situations. By using a systems biology approach, we developed an impact analysis that includes the classical statistics but also considers other crucial factors such as the magnitude of each gene’s expression change, their type and position in the given pathways, their interactions, etc. The impact analysis is an attempt to a deeper level of statistical analysis, informed by more pathway-specific biology than the existing techniques. On several illustrative data sets, the classical analysis produces both false positives and false negatives, while the impact analysis provides biologically meaningful results. This analysis method has been implemented as a Web-based tool, Pathway-Express, freely available as part of the Onto-Tools (http://vortex.cs.wayne.edu).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625
Cytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., & Ideker, T. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 · Cited by 51,888
KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
Ogata, H., Goto, S., Sato, K., Fujibuchi, W., Bono, H., & Kanehisa, M. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.1.29 · Cited by 31,232
(1999) · Cited by 12,854
Mootha, V. K., Lindgren, C. M., Eriksson, K.-F., Subramanian, A., Sihag, S., Lehar, J., Puigserver, P., Carlsson, E., Ridderstråle, M., Laurila, E., et al. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1180 · Cited by 10,197
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., Hart, A. A. M., Mao, M., Peterse, H. L., van der Kooy, K., Marton, M. J., Witteveen, A. T., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415530a · Cited by 9,536
Systematic determination of genetic network architecture
Tavazoie, S., Hughes, J. D., Campbell, M. J., Cho, R. J., & Church, G. M. (1999) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/10343 · Cited by 2,507
Gene-expression profiles predict survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma
Beer, D. G., Kardia, S. L. R., Huang, C.-C., Giordano, T. J., Levin, A. M., Misek, D. E., Lin, L., Chen, G., Gharib, T. G., Thomas, D. G., et al. (2002) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm733 · Cited by 2,025
Computational analysis of microarray data
Quackenbush, J. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35076576 · Cited by 1,471
Reactome: a knowledgebase of biological pathways
Joshi-Tope, G. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki072 · Cited by 1,290
Cited by
Enrichment Map: A Network-Based Method for Gene-Set Enrichment Visualization and Interpretation
Merico, D., Isserlin, R., Stueker, O., Emili, A., & Bader, G. D. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013984 · Cited by 2,235
Reimand, J., Isserlin, R., Voisin, V., Kucera, M., Tannus-Lopes, C., Rostamianfar, A., Wadi, L., Meyer, M., Wong, J., Xu, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-018-0103-9 · Cited by 1,970
Using MetaboAnalyst 3.0 for Comprehensive Metabolomics Data Analysis
Xia, J., & Wishart, D. S. (2016) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/cpbi.11 · Cited by 1,544
Guichard, C., Amaddeo, G., Imbeaud, S., Ladeiro, Y., Pelletier, L., Maad, I. B., Calderaro, J., Bioulac-Sage, P., Letexier, M., Degos, F., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2256 · Cited by 1,453
A novel signaling pathway impact analysis
Tarca, A. L., Draghici, S., Khatri, P., Hassan, S. S., Mittal, P., Kim, J.-S., Kim, C. J., Kusanovic, J. P., & Romero, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn577 · Cited by 1,031
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Draghici, S., Khatri, P., Tarca, A. L., Amin, K., Done, A., Voichita, C., Georgescu, C., & Romero, R.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2007-09-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1537-1545
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154972152
- Cited by
- 1,249
- References
- 47
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systems biology approach for pathway level analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.6202607
- The paper
- Draghici, S., Khatri, P., Tarca, A. L., Amin, K., Done, A., Voichita, C., Georgescu, C., & Romero, R. (2007). A systems biology approach for pathway level analysis. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.6202607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
