Cited by 1,031Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

A novel signaling pathway impact analysis

Open access
Tarca, Adi Laurentiu, Draghici, Sorin, Khatri, Purvesh, Hassan, Sonia S., Mittal, Pooja, Kim, Jung-sun, Kim, Chong Jai, Kusanovic, Juan Pedro +1 more·2009·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Gene expression class comparison studies may identify hundreds or thousands of genes as differentially expressed (DE) between sample groups. Gaining biological insight from the result of such experiments can be approached, for instance, by identifying the signaling pathways impacted by the observed changes. Most of the existing pathway analysis methods focus on either the number of DE genes observed in a given pathway (enrichment analysis methods), or on the correlation between the pathway genes and the class of the samples (functional class scoring methods). Both approaches treat the pathways as simple sets of genes, disregarding the complex gene interactions that these pathways are built to describe. Results: We describe a novel signaling pathway impact analysis (SPIA) that combines the evidence obtained from the classical enrichment analysis with a novel type of evidence, which measures the actual perturbation on a given pathway under a given condition. A bootstrap procedure is used to assess the significance of the observed total pathway perturbation. Using simulations we show that the evidence derived from perturbations is independent of the pathway enrichment evidence. This allows us to calculate a global pathway significance P-value, which combines the enrichment and perturbation P-values. We illustrate the capabilities of the novel method on four real datasets. The results obtained on these data show that SPIA has better specificity and more sensitivity than several widely used pathway analysis methods. Availability: SPIA was implemented as an R package available at http://vortex.cs.wayne.edu/ontoexpress/ Contact: sorin@wayne.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn577

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SASP produced by all Sen cells activated downstream signalling pathways in receiving NSen SCs, including senescence, apoptosis and inflammatory responses.

    “A signalling pathway impact analysis (SPIA)40 of transcription factors involved in these interactions revealed that the SASP produced by all Sen cells activated downstream signalling pathways in receiving NSen SCs (senescence, apoptosis and inflammatory responses) and inhibited cell-cycle and proliferative pathways (MAPK and AKT signalling) (Extended Data Fig. 11f).”
  • The SASP produced by all Sen cells inhibited cell-cycle and proliferative pathways (MAPK and AKT signalling) in receiving NSen SCs.

    “A signalling pathway impact analysis (SPIA)40 of transcription factors involved in these interactions revealed that the SASP produced by all Sen cells activated downstream signalling pathways in receiving NSen SCs (senescence, apoptosis and inflammatory responses) and inhibited cell-cycle and proliferative pathways (MAPK and AKT signalling) (Extended Data Fig. 11f).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tarca, A. L., Draghici, S., Khatri, P., Hassan, S. S., Mittal, P., Kim, J.-S., Kim, C. J., Kusanovic, J. P., & Romero, R.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • 1 Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University, 431 State Hall, Detroit, MI 48202 and 2Perinatology Research Branch-NIH/NICHD, 4 Brush, 3990 John R, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2008-11-05
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
75-82
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2110687686
Cited by
1,031
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 34
FWCI
8.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0438970, 0234806)
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health (CA022453)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG003491)
  • National Cancer Institute (R21CA100740, U01CA117478, P30CA022453)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS045207)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R21EB000990)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Division of Biological Infrastructure
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
pathway perturbation, pathway enrichment, differentially expressed genes, gene interaction networks, R package
MeSH terms
False Positive Reactions, Female, Humans, Labor, Obstetric, Models, Genetic, Pregnancy, Colorectal Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, Computational Biology, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review