PreprintCited by 311Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenome Rearrangement Algorithms

Human Whole-Genome Shotgun Sequencing

Open access
Weber, James L., Myers, Eugene W.·1997·Genome Research

Abstract

Large-scale sequencing of the human genome is now under way (Boguski et al. 1996;Marshall and Pennisi 1996).Although at the beginning of the Genome Project, many doubted the scientific value of sequencing the entire human genome, these doubts have evaporated almost entirely (Gibbs 1995;Olson 1995).Primary reasons for generating the human genomic sequence are listed in Table 1.The approach being taken for human genomic sequencing is the same as that used for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Caenorhabditis elegans genomes, namely construction of overlapping arrays of large insert Escherichia coli clones, followed by complete sequencing of these clones one at a time.In this article, we outline an alternative approach to sequencing the human and other large genomes, which we argue is less costly and more informative than the clone-by-clone approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.7.5.401

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nematostella genes are more similar to vertebrate genes than to fly and nematode genes, based on Bayesian branch length estimation and percent sequence identity.

    “We compared predicted protein sequences from Nematostella to those from other metazoan and outgroup genomes, and find that Nematostella genes are more similar to vertebrate genes than to fly and nematode genes using bayesian branch length estimation and an analysis of percent sequence identity.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. M.K. Hect, R.H. MacIntyre, and M.T. Clegg), pp. 157-196. Plenum, New York, NY.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weber, J. L., & Myers, E. W.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
1997-05-01
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
401-409
ISSN
  • 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5469
OpenAlex
W2125349979
Cited by
311
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
Keywords
human genome sequencing, whole genome shotgun sequencing, sequencing cost, Human Genome Project
MeSH terms
Cloning, Molecular, Forecasting, Humans, Polymorphism, Genetic, Genome, Human, Human Genome Project, Sequence Tagged Sites, Sequence Analysis, DNA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review